Scrum PSM-I Exam Dumps

The correct answer is C. Scrum defines accountabilities for product value, team effectiveness, and creating Done Increments, but it does not give the Scrum Master, Product Owner, or Scrum Team formal managerial authority to hire or fire people. Personnel decisions such as removing someone from a team are typically the responsibility of the organization and its management structure. In this case, the hiring manager or appropriate people manager would be responsible for removing the Developer if that becomes necessary.

Option A is incorrect because although the Scrum Master helps remove impediments, that does not mean they have authority over employment or staffing decisions. Option B is incorrect because the Product Owner is accountable for maximizing product value, not for personnel management. Option D is incorrect because the Scrum Team is self-managing with respect to its work, but it does not generally have organizational authority to remove employees from the team.

The Scrum Master should still help the team address the conflict by coaching, facilitating conversations, and improving collaboration. But if actual removal is required, that action belongs to the organization's management system, not to a Scrum accountability.

The Product Owner is responsible for ensuring that the most valuable functionality is produced first, at all times, by ordering and prioritizing the Product Backlog. The Product Owner also interacts with stakeholders to understand their needs and expectations, and to communicate the vision and progress of the product. The other options are not part of the Product Owner role according to Scrum, as they are either too prescriptive or too technical.

The Product Owner is responsible for engaging the stakeholders, as stated in the Scrum Guide1: ''The Product Owner is one person, not a committee. The Product Owner may represent the desires of a committee in the Product Backlog, but those wanting to change a Product Backlog item's priority must address the Product Owner.''

Architecture and infrastructure are handled in Scrum by implementing them along with functional development of the product, and by adding them to the Product Backlog and addressing them in early Sprints, while always requiring at least some business functionality, no matter how small, as stated in [2]: ''Scrum does not distinguish between developing functionality or architecture. They are developed together, as they are both important and support each other. Architecture is not a separate phase; it is part of the product development. Architecture is added to the Product Backlog as any other feature or functionality.''

According to the Scrum Guide1, an Increment is a concrete stepping stone toward the Product Goal. Each Increment is additive to all prior Increments and thoroughly verified, ensuring that all Increments work together. In order to provide value, an Increment must be usable. Multiple Increments may be created within a Sprint. The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism. However, an Increment may be delivered to stakeholders prior to the end of the Sprint. The Sprint Review should never be considered a gate to releasing value. Therefore, the best description of an increment of working software is additional features in a usable state that complement those delivered in previous iterations.