Scrum PSM-II Exam Dumps

As the Scrum Master, your role is to serve the Scrum Team by helping them to work effectively and deliver value. You are not responsible for managing the work or assigning tasks to the Developers. You should respect the self-organization and autonomy of the Developers, and support them in finding their own solutions to the problem. You should also facilitate collaboration and communication among the Developers and with other stakeholders, such as Phil and the Product Owner.

Some reasons why the other options are not correct are:

A: Preparing the Sprint Backlogs each day for the teams so Phil can spend some time in each team. This option is not correct because it violates the Scrum framework and the Scrum Master role. The Sprint Backlog is owned and managed by the Developers, not by the Scrum Master. The Scrum Master should not interfere with or dictate how the Developers plan and execute their work. The Scrum Master should also not impose a solution that may not be optimal or feasible for the teams or for Phil.

B: Allocate Phil to one team per Sprint, so that over four Sprints every team will have had the support it requires. This option is not correct because it violates the Scrum framework and the Scrum Master role. The Scrum Master should not allocate resources or assign tasks to the teams or to Phil. The Scrum Master should also not impose a solution that may not be aligned with the Product Owner's priorities or the teams' needs.

D: Ask Phil for a plan to hire and train additional people in his domain, and in the meantime work with the Product Owner and Developers to re-prioritize the work so that tasks not depending on Phil can be done first. This option is not correct because it violates the Scrum framework and the Scrum Master role. The Scrum Master should not ask Phil to do something that may be beyond his authority or responsibility. The Scrum Master should also not work with the Product Owner and Developers to re-prioritize the work, as this is the Product Owner's accountability. The Scrum Master should respect the Product Owner's decisions on what is valuable and what is not, and support the Developers in delivering that value.

What is a Scrum Master? | Scrum.org

What is a Sprint Backlog? | Scrum.org

Who is responsible for dependency management? | Scrum.org

[Managing Dependencies in Scrum - Scrum Alliance]

A Scrum Team is self-managing, meaning that they have the autonomy and authority to organize and manage their own work within the boundaries of Scrum. A self-managing Scrum Team:

Creates their own Sprint Backlog, reflecting all work that is part of the Definition of Done , which is a valid option as it shows that the Developers are responsible for planning and executing the work needed to deliver a potentially releasable Increment at the end of each Sprint.

Collaboratively selects and re-plans their work during the Sprint (D), which is another valid option as it shows that the Developers are able to adapt to changing requirements, priorities, or circumstances within the Sprint, without relying on external instructions or approvals.

The other options are not correct because they:

Invite management to the Daily Scrum for a progress update and subsequently work with the Scrum Master to optimize the plan for the next day (A), which is not a good option as it shows that the Scrum Team is not self-managing, but rather dependent on management intervention and direction. The Daily Scrum is an event for the Developers to inspect their progress and plan their work for the next 24 hours, not a status report for management or anyone else.

Work strictly within the boundaries of their function description, and hand off work in a timely fashion to the other members within the team (B), which is not a good option as it shows that the Scrum Team is not self-managing, but rather following a rigid and siloed structure. The Developers are cross-functional, meaning that they have all the skills necessary to create a ''Done'' Increment, and they collaborate and coordinate their work as one team, not as separate individuals or roles.

Invite the right external people to the Sprint Planning to help them create a complete and detailed Sprint Backlog before the meeting timebox expires (E), which is not a good option as it shows that the Scrum Team is not self-managing, but rather relying on external assistance and input. The Sprint Planning is an event for the Scrum Team to create a Sprint Goal and a Sprint Backlog, based on the Product Owner's proposal and the Developers' forecast. The Scrum Team may invite other people to provide advice or expertise, but they are ultimately accountable for their own plan.

B: Ask the Developers and the Product Owner if removing regression testing from the Definition of Done allows the team to produce useful and valuable Increments at the end of every Sprint. This is a good way to challenge the decision and make them think about the consequences of lowering the quality standards. The Scrum Master can help them understand the importance of delivering a potentially releasable product increment that meets the expectations of the stakeholders and customers.

C: Ask the Developers and the Product Owner what problem they are going to solve by altering the Definition of Done during the Sprint to remove regression testing. Will this raise transparency or improve quality? This is a good way to explore the root cause of the issue and find out why they are not able to complete regression testing for all of the selected Product Backlog items in the Sprint. The Scrum Master can help them identify and remove any impediments or inefficiencies that prevent them from achieving their Sprint Goal.

Scrum Guide 2020, page 9: ''The Definition of Done is a formal description of the state of the Increment when it meets the quality measures required for the product.''

Scrum Guide 2020, page 13: ''The Scrum Master serves the Scrum Team in several ways, including coaching the team members in self-management and cross-functionality.''

Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 12: ''The Definition of Done is a crucial aspect of transparency. If it is not clear when work is done, then stakeholders may make wrong assumptions about the state of the software.''

Scrum is a framework for addressing complex adaptive problems, such as product development, that require empirical process control and frequent inspection and adaptation. Scrum helps to mitigate the risks of:

The timescale of the planned work (A), by delivering potentially releasable increments of value at the end of each Sprint, which is a fixed time-box of one month or less.

The stability and complexity of the technology (B), by allowing the Development Team to self-organize and choose the best way to create a ''Done'' increment that meets the Definition of Done.

The complexity and unpredictability of the requirements , by enabling the Product Owner to manage the Product Backlog, which is an ordered list of what is needed in the product and can change as more is learned about the product, users, market, and technology.

The skills and working relationships of the people on the teams (D), by fostering a culture of collaboration, transparency, and accountability among the Scrum Team members and stakeholders.

The situation described in the question indicates that there are multiple problems in the Scrum Team that have led to the increase of technical debt and the dissatisfaction of the Product Owner. These problems include:

The Scrum Team has not used the past Sprint Retrospectives effectively to inspect and adapt. The Sprint Retrospective is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to reflect on their performance and identify improvements for the next Sprint. If the Scrum Team has not been using this event properly, they may have missed some issues or opportunities that could have improved their quality and value delivery.

The Developers have not been paying enough attention to quality. The Developers are accountable for creating a potentially releasable product increment that meets the Definition of Done and the Sprint Goal. If the Developers have not been focusing on quality, they may have introduced defects, errors, or inefficiencies that compromise the functionality and usability of the product.

The Scrum Team is not having conversations around technical debt. Technical debt is the accumulation of work that needs to be done to ensure that a product is maintainable and extensible in the future. If the Scrum Team is not discussing and managing technical debt, they may be neglecting some important aspects of the product architecture, design, or code that could affect its scalability, performance, or security.

The Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent. The Scrum Master is responsible for establishing an environment where transparency, inspection, and adaptation can occur. If the Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent, they may have allowed some hidden problems or assumptions to persist that could affect the quality and value of the product.

Scrum Guide 2020, page 13: ''The purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness.''

Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: ''The Developers are the people in the Scrum Team that are committed to creating any aspect of a usable Increment each Sprint.''

Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 12: ''Technical debt is a metaphor for expressing how doing things in a suboptimal way can accumulate over time and make it harder to change or improve a product in the future.''

Scrum Guide 2020, page 6: ''The Scrum Master is accountable for establishing Scrum as defined in the Scrum Guide. They do this by helping everyone understand Scrum theory and practice, both within the Scrum Team and the organization.''