- 161 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | Plat-Dev-301 |
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II |
| Exam Questions: | 161 |
| Last Updated: | August 24, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Platform Developer II |
| Exam Tags: |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Salesforce certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Salesforce Plat-Dev-301 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Salesforce Plat-Dev-301 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Salesforce Plat-Dev-301 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Salesforce Plat-Dev-301 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Universal Containers needs to integrate with their own, existing, internal custom web application. The web application accepts JSON payloads, resizes product images, and sends the resized images back to Salesforce. What should the developer use to implement this integration?
Comprehensive and 19Detailed 150 to 250 words of 20
This integration requiremen21t involves two specific needs: sending a custom JSON payload and handling a response that involves updating data in Salesforce. Outbound Messaging (Option C) is a declarative tool, but it is limited to XML/SOAP protocols and cannot send JSON. Therefore, a custom programmatic solution using Apex is required to construct and send the JSON payload to the external REST service.
Since the integration must be triggered by an event in Salesforce (likely the upload or update of a product record), an Apex trigger is the most direct starting point. However, as noted in previous questions, callouts cannot be performed directly within a trigger's execution context because they would block the database transaction. The developer must use asynchronous processing to handle the callout. An @future(callout=true) method is the standard way to achieve this. The trigger captures the necessary data, passes it to the future method, and the future method then performs the HTTP request to the external application.
Once the external application resizes the image, it can use the Salesforce REST API to send the resized file back to Salesforce. While Platform Events (Option D) are a modern alternative for event-driven architectures, they would still require an asynchronous subscriber (like a trigger or a flow) to actually perform the callout, making the Trigger + Future method combination the most straightforward and traditional answer for this PDII scenario.
==========
A developer is trying to access org data from within a test class. Which sObject type requires the test class to have the (seeAllData=true) annotation?
Comprehensive and Detailed
Salesforce enforces test isolation, meaning unit tests do not have access to the data in the organization by default. However, some objects are considered 'metadata-like' or 'setup objects' and are always visible to tests without special annotations. These include Users (Option C), Profiles (Option D), and RecordTypes (Option A).
Conversely, some objects are considered 'data' but cannot be easily created within a test method due to their complexity or nature. Reports (Option B), along with Pricebooks and Folders, fall into a category where access to existing org data is often required because the platform does not support DML operations to create them in a test context. To query for an existing Report record in a unit test, the test class or method must be annotated with @isTest(seeAllData=true).
Note: It is a best practice to avoid seeAllData=true whenever possible to ensure tests are deterministic and independent of the environment, but it remains a requirement for Report-related logic.
Given the following containment hierarchy:
HTML
What is the correct way to communicate the new value of a property named "passthrough" to my-parent-component if the property is defined within my-child-component?
In Lightning Web Components (LWC), data flows 'down' via properties and 'up' via events. When a child component needs to communicate a change in a property or state to its parent, it must dispatch a CustomEvent. To pass specific data---such as the new value of the passthrough property---along with the event, the developer must use the detail property within the event initialization object.
Option C is the correct syntax. It creates a new CustomEvent named 'passthrough' and assigns the current value of the component's property (this.passthrough) to the detail key. The parent component can then listen for this event (using onpassthrough={handleEvent}) and access the value via event.detail. Option A is incorrect because it wraps the variable in quotes, passing the literal string 'this.passthrough' instead of the actual data. Option B creates an event but fails to include the data payload, meaning the parent would know an event occurred but wouldn't receive the new value. Option D uses incorrect syntax for event naming and variable referencing. Using the standard CustomEvent constructor with the detail property is the platform-standard way to ensure robust, typed data communication between component layers in the Shadow DOM.
==========
A query using OR between a Date and a RecordType is performing poorly in a Large Data Volume environment. How can the developer optimize this?
Comprehensive and Detailed
In SOQL, using the OR operator often prevents the Query Optimizer from using indexes effectively, especially if the fields involve different types of data. This is known as a 'non-selective' query structure in LDV environments.
By breaking the query into two separate SOQL statements (Option A), the developer allows each query to be evaluated independently.
SELECT ... FROM Account WHERE CreatedDate = :thisDate (Uses the standard index on CreatedDate).
SELECT ... FROM Account WHERE RecordTypeId = :goldenRT (Uses the standard index on RecordTypeId).
The developer can then combine the results into a Map<Id, Account> to ensure uniqueness (preventing duplicates if a record meets both criteria). This approach ensures both queries are 'selective' and run much faster than a single query with an OR filter.
Option D is a common anti-pattern because formulas are generally not indexed unless they are 'deterministic' and a custom index is requested from Salesforce support; even then, filtering on formulas is often slower than direct field filters. Option B and C do not address the underlying database performance issue.
Consider the Apex controller below, that is called from an Aura component:
Line 5 @AuraEnabled
Line 6 public List
Line 7 String[] arrayltems = new String[]{ 'red', 'green', 'blue' };
Line 8 return arrayltems;
Line 9 }
Line 10}
What is wrong with this code?
When building Apex controllers for Aura Components (or Lightning Web Components), any method annotated with @AuraEnabled must be defined as static. The snippet provided defines the method getStringArray() as an instance method (public List<String>...) rather than a static method (public static List<String>...).
The Lightning Component framework does not instantiate an object of the Apex class; instead, it calls the method statically. If the method is not static, the framework cannot locate or execute it, resulting in an error. While global was required in older versions or for managed packages, public is sufficient for code within the same namespace. Apex handles the serialization of standard types like Lists automatically, so manual JSON serialization is not required.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed