- 259 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | Plat-Admn-202 |
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder |
| Exam Questions: | 259 |
| Last Updated: | July 8, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Administrator |
| Exam Tags: | Salesforce Administrator Intermediate Level Salesforce Administrators and Junior Salesforce Consultants |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Salesforce certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Ursa Major Solar wants to create a relationship between the standard Contact object and a custom Solar Project object. Contacts can potentially be related to multiple Solar Project objects, and a Solar Project can have multiple Contracts associated with it. How should an app builder configure the data model?
The correct answer is C. Two master-detail relationships on a new custom object.
This requirement is a many-to-many relationship: one Contact can relate to many Solar Projects, and one Solar Project can relate to many Contacts. Salesforce models this with a junction object, which is a custom object with two master-detail relationships.
A simple lookup on one object would not properly support the many-to-many data model.
===========
Cloud Kicks (CK) wants to track orders against inventory, ensuring its ability to fulfill order requests. CK created a junction object called Request Inventory to enable many-to-many relationships with the Inventory and Order objects. What does the app builder need to provide to ensure users can view Request Inventory records?
Users need Read access to both master objects.
Request Inventory is a junction object with two master-detail relationships: Inventory and Order. For junction objects, access is based on the associated master records and the sharing behavior of the master-detail relationships. Salesforce documentation for object relationship considerations explains that sharing access to a junction object record is determined by access to both associated master records.
Why not the others? Sharing rules are not created directly on a master-detail detail object in the same way, because it is controlled by parent. Apex-based sharing is not needed. Read access to only the first master object is not enough because the junction record connects two master records.
===========
Universal Containers wants to give sales managers the ability to quickly provide sign off On an Opportunity via the Opportunity record page when a sales rep has discounted a deal by 20% To 30%. Which two features should be used for this requirement? Choose 2 answers
The correct answers are A. Dynamic Actions and C. Approval Process.
An Approval Process is required because sales managers must provide formal sign off when an Opportunity discount meets the defined criteria. Salesforce approval processes define the criteria a record must meet, the steps required for approval, and who must approve it.
Dynamic Actions are also needed because Universal Containers wants the sign-off action available quickly from the Opportunity record page. Dynamic Actions let app builders control which actions appear on Lightning record pages based on conditions.
Why others are incorrect:
Schema Builder is for data model design, not approval/sign-off UI behavior.
Validation Rule can block invalid data, but it does not provide manager approval or sign-off.
===========
An app builder at Cloud Kicks created a custom object and related fields in the schema builder. Which next steps should the app builder take to ensure users can access the new object and fields?
The correct next steps are A. Add the fields to the page layout on the object and C. Create a permission set for access to the object and fields.
This is a two-part access problem in Salesforce: users need both security access and user-interface exposure. Creating a custom object and fields in Schema Builder only creates the metadata. It does not automatically guarantee that end users can see, create, edit, or use those records and fields.
C is required because object permissions define the base-level access users have to records for an object, such as create, read, edit, and delete. Salesforce also uses field permissions / field-level security to control whether users can view or edit individual fields. Permission sets are the correct modern mechanism to grant object and field permissions to selected users without changing their base profile.
A is also required because page layouts control the organization of fields on record detail and edit pages. Even if a user has field-level access, the field must be placed on the relevant page layout for normal record-page visibility and editing in the UI. Salesforce specifically separates field-level security as the access-control layer and page layouts as the UI organization layer.
B is incorrect because ''Allow Reports'' only makes the object available for report creation; it does not grant users object CRUD access or field-level visibility. D is incorrect because data types are assigned during field creation, not after, and choosing a data type does not grant user access.
Cloud Kicks wants to display the number of opportunities that Are Closed Won with a Close Date within the last year on the Account detail Page. What should an app builder use to implement this?
The correct answer is D. Roll-up summary field.
Cloud Kicks wants to display a count of related Opportunities on the Account record where the Opportunities are Closed Won and have a Close Date within the last year. A roll-up summary field is the correct declarative feature because it calculates values from related records, including counts, sums, minimums, and maximums. Salesforce documentation confirms that roll-up summary fields calculate values from related records and can display values on the parent record.
The app builder can create a roll-up summary field on Account with filter criteria such as:
Stage = Closed Won
Close Date = Last 365 Days / Last Year
Why others are incorrect:
Activity timeline displays activities, not Opportunity counts.
Formula field cannot count multiple child Opportunity records.
Validation rule blocks invalid saves; it does not calculate related record totals.
===========
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed