- 302 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Amazon |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | DEA-C01 |
| Exam Name: | AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate |
| Exam Questions: | 302 |
| Last Updated: | August 23, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | AWS Certified Data Engineer Associate |
| Exam Tags: |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Amazon certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Amazon DEA-C01 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Amazon DEA-C01 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Amazon DEA-C01 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Amazon DEA-C01 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
A company needs to store and analyze a large amount of IoT sensor data. The company needs to retain the data indefinitely. The company analyzes the data in an Amazon Redshift cluster.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Option B is correct because the requirement is to retain a very large dataset indefinitely and analyze it from Amazon Redshift in the most cost-effective way. Amazon Redshift Spectrum allows Redshift to query data directly in Amazon S3 without loading all of the data into Redshift-managed storage. That reduces warehouse storage cost for long-term retained data. AWS documentation also recommends using Apache Parquet for Spectrum because Parquet is a columnar format, which allows Redshift Spectrum to read only the columns needed instead of scanning entire text files. This improves performance and lowers query cost.
Option A and D are less cost-effective because auto-copy loads data into the Redshift cluster, which means the company pays to store all historical data in Redshift even though the requirement is indefinite retention of a large volume of IoT data. Option C is worse than B because JSON is a row-oriented text format, and AWS guidance says columnar formats such as Parquet or ORC are preferred for Redshift Spectrum for better scan efficiency and lower cost.
An ecommerce company collects daily customer transaction logs in CSV format and stores the logs in Amazon S3. The company uses Amazon Athena to scan a subset of attributes from the logs on the same day the company receives each log.
Query times are increasing because of increasing transaction volume. The company wants to improve query performance.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the SHORTEST query times?
Amazon Athena achieves the fastest query performance when data is stored in columnar formats such as Apache Parquet and when queries can take advantage of partition pruning and predicate pushdown.
Converting CSV files to Parquet significantly reduces the amount of data scanned because Parquet stores data in a column-oriented layout. Since Athena queries only a subset of attributes, it reads only the required columns instead of scanning entire rows, which dramatically improves performance. Predicate pushdown further reduces query time by filtering data at the storage layer.
Partitioning the data by date ensures that Athena scans only the relevant partitions for same-day queries, minimizing unnecessary data reads. Storing one Parquet file per day is efficient and avoids the overhead of managing excessive small files.
ORC is also a columnar format, but Parquet is more commonly optimized and recommended for Athena workloads in AWS exam guidance. JSON and Avro are row-based or semi-row-based formats and result in larger scan sizes and slower query execution.
Therefore, Option D provides the shortest query times and aligns with Athena performance best practices.
A company uses an Amazon Redshift Single-AZ cluster for enterprise analytics. The company wants to set up a highly resilient disaster recovery (DR) solution for the cluster. The solution must meet a recovery time objective (RTO) of less than 1 hour.
Which solution will meet this requirement MOST cost-effectively?
Option B best meets a highly resilient DR requirement with an RTO under 1 hour because a Multi-AZ deployment is designed to provide rapid recovery through redundancy across Availability Zones, rather than requiring a restore-and-rebuild process after a failure. A snapshot-based strategy (Option C) can be valuable for backup and regional recovery, but restoring a new cluster from snapshots is a heavier operation and is not the most reliable path to consistently achieving sub-hour RTO during real incidents. The study material highlights snapshot/restore as an operational mechanism for creating a new environment from a Redshift cluster's saved state, which inherently implies a restore process and associated time to bring resources online.
Option D (cluster relocation) is primarily an operational move mechanism and is not the same as maintaining continuously resilient capacity for unplanned AZ-impacting events. Option A is not the best choice because Multi-AZ resiliency is aligned with modern Redshift architectures, and RA3 is the recommended node family for contemporary Redshift deployments where performance and managed storage characteristics are key for enterprise analytics. The study material reinforces Amazon Redshift as the platform for high-performance enterprise analytics, so a resilience-first configuration is appropriate.
A company processes a CSV file that contains millions of transaction records every day. The file is stored in Amazon S3. Each transaction must be validated before updating a database. The company needs a solution that will process the data in parallel. The solution must use error handling that stops the entire process if more than 15% of the records fail validation.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Your organization is migrating a legacy data warehouse from on-premises to AWS. You need to move 50 TB of historical data and establish an ongoing change data capture (CDC) stream for new transactions. You want to minimize network bandwidth and total migration time.
Which AWS service or combination of services is most appropriate for this two-phase migration and ongoing CDC?
AWS DMS handles both initial full-load migration and continuous CDC, offloading the complexity of change detection to a managed service. DataSync can accelerate the initial bulk transfer with optimized network protocols. Once the full load completes, DMS CDC tasks automatically capture and stream ongoing changes to Kinesis or other targets, minimizing latency and operator overhead. This is the standard pattern for heterogeneous database migrations on AWS.
Snowball is useful for offline transfer but does not natively support CDC; hourly Glue jobs introduce lag and are not true streaming; S3 Transfer Acceleration is not designed for this use case and EventBridge cannot provide transactional CDC; Application Discovery Service is for discovery and assessment, not data movement.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed