2026 Actual Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 Dumps, Updated Exam Questions for Guaranteed Pass

Plat-Admn-202 free sample questions and answers

Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 practice quiz with correct answers for search indexing.

1. Question 1

   Universal Containers (UC) requires that all users specify a Contract is sent on each Opportunity prior to marking it as "Closed Won". UC wants to be able to report on how many Opportunities have sent Contracts compared to how many have a missing contract when the Opportunities close Which field type should an app builder configure to fulfill this requirement?

   APicklist
   

   BText
   

   CCheckbox
   

   DText Area
   

   Correct answer: C

   The correct answer is C. Checkbox.

   Universal Containers needs to track whether a contract was sent or not sent before an Opportunity is marked Closed Won. This is a simple Yes/No reporting requirement, so a Checkbox field is the best field type. Salesforce checkbox fields are represented as True/False values and can be used in reports and list view filters.

   Picklist is unnecessary for a two-state value. Text and Text Area would create inconsistent reporting because users could type different values.

   
   

2. Question 2

   The app builder at Cloud Kicks has created a custom object named Delivery_c to track the Details of products shipped to customers. Which two actions should the app builder take to prevent users in the shipping department from Deleting delivery records? Choose 2 answers

   ARemove the delete button from the Delivery page layout.
   

   BUse a permission set to remove the Delete permission.
   

   CRemove the Delete permission from the Shipper profile.
   

   DChange the organization-wide default of deliveries to Private.
   

   Correct answer: A, C

   The correct answers are A. Remove the delete button from the Delivery page layout and C. Remove the Delete permission from the Shipper profile.

   The real security control is C because object permissions define whether users can create, read, edit, or delete records for an object. To prevent shipping users from deleting Delivery__c records, the app builder must remove the Delete object permission from the Shipper profile.

   A is also a valid supporting UI step because Salesforce page layouts can control whether standard/custom buttons are displayed. Removing the Delete button reduces the visible delete option on the record page. However, this alone is not complete security because hiding a button does not fully remove the underlying permission.

   Why others are incorrect:

   B is incorrect because a regular permission set grants additional access; it does not remove profile access.

   D is incorrect because OWD controls record-level sharing, not object-level Delete permission.

   ===========

   
   

3. Question 3

   An app builder is creating a custom object called Testimonial_c and wants to connect Testimonial_c records with both the submitter's Contact record and Account record If the Account is deleted, the Testimonial_c records should also be delete If the Contact is deleted, but the Account remains, the Testimonial_c records should remain. How should this be accomplished?

   ACreate a lookup relationship from Testimonial_to Account and a master-detail relationship from Testimonial to Contact.
   

   BMake Testimonial ca junction object between Account and Contact using master-detail relationships.
   

   CCreate a master-detail relationship from Testimonial_to Account and a lookup relationship from Testimonial To Contact.
   

   DMake both the Contact and Account fields required on the Testimonial object and create lookup relationships from Testimonial_cto Contact and to Account.
   

   Correct answer: C

   The correct design is to create a master-detail relationship from Testimonial__c to Account and a lookup relationship from Testimonial__c to Contact.

   The Account relationship must be master-detail because Salesforce deletes related detail records when the master record is deleted. That matches the requirement that if the Account is deleted, the related Testimonial__c records are also deleted. The Contact relationship must be lookup because the Testimonial__c record must remain when the Contact is deleted. Salesforce lookup relationships can keep the child record and clear the lookup value when the referenced record is deleted.

   Why the other options are wrong:

   A reverses the required behavior. B would delete the testimonial if either master side caused deletion behavior, which does not fit the Contact requirement. D uses lookup for Account, so it does not guarantee Account deletion will also delete Testimonial__c record

   
   

4. Question 4

   Universal Containers wants to understand return on investment for the latest advertising buy. They currently use a private security model for all objects. What should an app builder recommend?

   AOn an opportunities pipeline report
   

   BOnline Account Hierarchies and Raft Up Summary fields
   

   CConfigure Campaign Hierarchies and Campaign stasmics
   

   DChange to a public security model
   

   Correct answer: C

   The correct answer is C. Configure Campaign Hierarchies and Campaign statistics.

   To understand return on investment for an advertising buy, Universal Containers should use Salesforce Campaigns, especially Campaign Hierarchies and campaign reporting/statistics. Salesforce campaign hierarchy documentation explains that child campaign metrics roll up to the parent campaign, and Salesforce campaign reports can include campaign-hierarchy statistics for aggregate values.

   The private security model does not require changing the whole org to public. The business need is marketing ROI tracking, so Campaigns are the correct feature.

   A is incorrect because an opportunity pipeline report does not directly track advertising campaign ROI.

   B is incorrect because Account Hierarchies and roll-up summaries are not the standard solution for campaign ROI.

   D is incorrect because changing to a public security model is unnecessary and weakens data security.

   ===========

   
   

5. Question 5

   Northern Trail Outfitters has two custom objects that are part of a master- Detail relationship. What determines the ownership and sharing access of the detail record?

   AThe owner is set independently on the detail object's settings.
   

   BThe default owner is set in the parent object's settings.
   

   CThe Owner field on the Detail record
   

   DThe Owner field on the Master record
   

   Correct answer: D

   The correct answer is D. The Owner field on the Master record.

   In a master-detail relationship, the detail record does not have independent ownership. Salesforce documentation states that the Owner field on the detail object isn't available and is automatically set to the owner of the related master record.

   Sharing is also controlled by the parent/master record. Salesforce Help explains that when a custom object is on the detail side of a master-detail relationship, its organization-wide default is set to Controlled by Parent.

   A and C are incorrect because the detail record does not maintain independent ownership in a master-detail relationship. B is incorrect because ownership is not determined by a default owner setting on the parent object; it comes from the actual Owner field on the master record.

   ===========