Workday-Pro-Integrations Exam Dumps

In Workday reporting, selecting the appropriate Primary Business Object (PBO) and Related Business Objects (RBOs) is critical to ensure that the report retrieves and organizes data correctly based on the requirements. The requirement here is to create a report that outputs one row per worker for a specified supervisory organization, including their active benefit plans and the names and ages of all related dependents. The Worker business object contains fields like Employee, Benefit Plans, and Dependents, while the Dependent business object provides the Name and Age fields for dependents.

Why Worker as the PBO?The report needs to output 'one row per worker,' making the Worker business object the natural choice for the PBO. In Workday, the PBO defines the primary dataset and determines the granularity of the report (i.e., one row per instance of the PBO). Since the report revolves around workers and their associated data (benefit plans and dependents), Worker is the starting point. Additionally, the requirement specifies a supervisory organization at runtime, which is a filter applied to the Worker business object to limit the population.

Why Dependent as an RBO?The Worker business object includes a 'Dependents' field, which is a multi-instance field linking to the Dependent business object. To access detailed dependent data (Name and Age), the Dependent business object must be added as an RBO. This allows the report to pull in the related dependent information for each worker. Without the Dependent RBO, the report could only reference the existence of dependents, not their specific attributes like Name and Age.

Analysis of Benefit Plans:The Worker business object already contains the 'Benefit Plans' field, which provides access to active benefit plan data. Since this is a field directly available on the PBO (Worker), no additional RBO is needed to retrieve benefit plan information.

Option Analysis:

A . PBO: Dependent, RBO: Worker: Incorrect. If Dependent were the PBO, the report would output one row per dependent, not one row per worker, which contradicts the requirement. Additionally, Worker as an RBO would unnecessarily complicate accessing worker-level data.

B . PBO: Worker, RBO: Dependent: Correct. This aligns with the requirement: Worker as the PBO ensures one row per worker, and Dependent as the RBO provides access to dependent details (Name and Age). Benefit Plans are already accessible via the Worker PBO.

C . PBO: Dependent, no RBOs: Incorrect. This would result in one row per dependent and would not allow easy access to worker or benefit plan data, failing to meet the 'one row per worker' requirement.

D . PBO: Worker, no RBOs: Incorrect. While Worker as the PBO is appropriate, omitting the Dependent RBO prevents the report from retrieving dependent Name and Age fields, which are stored in the Dependent business object, not directly on Worker.

Implementation:

Create a custom report with Worker as the PBO.

Add a filter for the supervisory organization (specified at runtime) on the Worker PBO.

Add Dependent as an RBO to access Name and Age fields.

Include columns from Worker (e.g., Employee, Benefit Plans) and Dependent (e.g., Name, Age).

Reference from Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide:

Workday Report Writer Fundamentals: Section on 'Selecting Primary and Related Business Objects' explains how the PBO determines the report's row structure and RBOs extend data access to related objects.

Integration System Fundamentals: Discusses how multi-instance fields (e.g., Dependents on Worker) require RBOs to retrieve detailed attributes.

Overview

For an outbound Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) in Workday, the option that uses a Workday-delivered transformation to output a format other than Workday XML is Alternate Output Format. This allows you to select formats like CSV, which Workday handles without needing custom coding.

How It Works

When setting up an outbound EIB, you can use a custom report as the data source. By choosing an alternate output format, such as CSV, Workday automatically transforms the data into that format. This is surprising because it simplifies the process, requiring no additional user effort for transformation.

Why Not the Others?

XSL Attachment Transformation (B): This requires you to provide your own XSL file, making it a custom transformation, not delivered by Workday.

Custom Transformation (C): This is clearly user-defined, not Workday-delivered.

Custom Report Transformation (D): This also involves user customization, typically through XSL, and isn't a pre-built Workday option.

Comprehensive Analysis

This section provides a detailed examination of Workday's Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) transformation options, focusing on outbound integrations and the specific question of identifying the option that uses a Workday-delivered transformation to output a format other than Workday XML. We will explore the functionality, configuration, and implications of each option, ensuring a thorough understanding based on available documentation and resources.

Understanding Workday EIB and Outbound Integrations

Workday EIB is a no-code, graphical interface tool designed for both inbound and outbound integrations, facilitating the exchange of data between Workday and external systems. For outbound EIBs, the process involves extracting data from Workday (typically via a custom report) and delivering it to an external endpoint, such as via SFTP, email, or other protocols. The integration process consists of three key steps: Get Data, Transform, and Deliver.

Get Data: Specifies the data source, often a Workday custom report, which must be web service-enabled for EIB use.

Transform: Optionally transforms the data into a format suitable for the external system, using various transformation types.

Deliver: Defines the method and destination for sending the transformed data.

The question focuses on the Transform step, seeking an option that uses a Workday-delivered transformation to output a format other than Workday XML, which is typically the default format for Workday data exchanges.

Analyzing the Options

Let's evaluate each option provided in the question to determine which fits the criteria:

Alternate Output Format (A)

Description: This option is available when configuring the Get Data step, specifically when using a custom report as the data source. It allows selecting an alternate output format, such as CSV, Excel, or other supported formats, instead of the default Workday XML.

Functionality: When selected, Workday handles the transformation of the report data into the chosen format. For example, setting the alternate output format to CSV means the EIB will deliver a CSV file, and this transformation is performed by Workday without requiring the user to define additional transformation logic.

Workday-Delivered: Yes, as the transformation to the alternate format (e.g., CSV) is part of Workday's report generation capabilities, not requiring custom coding or user-provided files.

Output Format Other Than Workday XML: Yes, formats like CSV are distinct from Workday XML, fulfilling the requirement.

From resources like Workday HCM features | Workday EIB, it's noted that custom reports can use CSV as an alternate output format, and this is managed by Workday, supporting our conclusion.

XSL Attachment Transformation (B)

Description: This involves attaching an XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) file to the EIB for transforming the data, typically from XML to another format like CSV or a custom structure.

Functionality: The user must create or provide the XSL file, which defines how the data is transformed. This is used in the Transform step to manipulate the XML output from the Get Data step.

Workday-Delivered: No, as the XSL file is custom-created by the user. Resources like r/workday on Reddit: EIB xslt Transformation discuss users working on XSL transformations, indicating they are user-defined, not pre-built by Workday.

Output Format Other Than Workday XML: Yes, it can output formats like CSV, but it's not Workday-delivered, so it doesn't meet the criteria.

Custom Transformation (C)

Description: This option allows users to define their own transformation logic, often through scripting or other custom methods, to convert the data into the desired format.

Functionality: It is a user-defined transformation, typically used for complex scenarios where standard options are insufficient.

Workday-Delivered: No, as it explicitly states 'custom,' meaning it's not provided by Workday.

Output Format Other Than Workday XML: Yes, it can output various formats, but again, it's not Workday-delivered, so it doesn't fit.

Custom Report Transformation (D)

Description: This might refer to transformations specifically related to custom reports, potentially involving user-defined logic to manipulate the report data.

Functionality: From resources like Spark Databox - using custom report transformation, it involves using custom XSL transformations, indicating user involvement. It seems to be a subset of custom transformations, focusing on report data.

Workday-Delivered: No, as it involves custom XSL, which is user-provided, not pre-built by Workday.

Output Format Other Than Workday XML: Yes, it can output formats like pipe-delimited files, but it's not Workday-delivered, so it doesn't meet the criteria.

In Workday, when you need to upload a new XSLT (Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformations) file to modify or replace an existing transformation within a pre-existing document transformation integration system, the specific task required is 'Edit XSLT Attachment Transformation.' This task allows users to update the XSLT file that governs how XML data is transformed within the integration system without creating an entirely new transformation object.

Here's why this is the correct answer:

Workday's integration systems often rely on XSLT to transform XML data into the desired format for downstream systems or processes. When an XSLT file has already been associated with an integration system (e.g., as part of an Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) or a Document Transformation Connector), updating it requires accessing the existing transformation configuration.

The 'Edit XSLT Attachment Transformation' task enables users to upload a revised version of the XSLT file. This action replaces the previous file while maintaining the integration system's configuration, ensuring continuity without necessitating additional changes to the system itself.

This task is distinct from other options because it specifically targets the transformation logic (XSLT) rather than broader integration components or services.

Let's examine why the other options are incorrect:

A . Edit Integration Attachment: This task is used to manage generic attachments associated with an integration, such as input files or supplementary documents, but it does not specifically address XSLT transformations. It lacks the precision required for updating transformation logic.

B . Edit Integration Attachment Service: This is not a recognized task in Workday's integration framework. It appears to be a conflation of terms and does not align with the documented processes for managing XSLT files.

D . Edit Integration Service Attachment: While this might suggest modifying an attachment related to an integration service, it is not the correct task for handling XSLT files in a document transformation context. Workday documentation consistently points to 'Edit XSLT Attachment Transformation' for this purpose.

The process typically involves:

Navigating to the integration system in Workday (e.g., via the 'Search' bar by entering the integration system name).

Using the related actions menu to select 'Integration System' > 'Edit XSLT Attachment Transformation.'

Uploading the new XSLT file, which must comply with Workday's size limitations (e.g., 30 MB for attachments) and be properly formatted.

Saving the changes, which updates the transformation logic without altering other integration configurations.

This approach ensures that transformations remain aligned with business requirements, such as reformatting data for compatibility with external systems, while leveraging Workday's secure and efficient integration tools.

:

Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide: 'Configure Integration System - TRANSFORMATION' section, which details the use of XSLT files in document transformations and the associated tasks.

Workday Documentation: 'Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB)' and 'Document Transformation Connector' sections, where the 'Edit XSLT Attachment Transformation' task is outlined for updating XSLT files.

Workday Community: Guidance on managing XSLT attachments, confirming this task as the standard method for updating pre-existing transformations.

In Workday integrations, XSLT is used to transform XML data, such as the output from a web service-enabled report or EIB, into a desired format for third-party systems. In this scenario, you need to create an XSLT template that matches the wd:Education_Group element in the provided XML and transforms it to produce the degree data in the format shown in the Transformed_Record example. The goal is to output each degree (e.g., 'California University MBA' and 'Georgetown University B.S.') as a <Degree> element within a <Degrees> parent element.

Here's why option A is correct:

Template Matching: The <xsl:template match='wd:Education_Group'> correctly targets the wd:Education_Group element in the XML, which contains multiple wd:Education elements, each with a wd:Degree child, as shown in the XML snippet (e.g., <wd:Education>California University</wd:Education><wd:Degree>MBA</wd:Degree>).

Transformation Logic:

<Degree> creates the outer <Degree> element for each education group, matching the structure in the Transformed_Record example (e.g., <Degree>California University MBA</Degree>).

<xsl:copy><xsl:value-of select='*'/></xsl:copy> copies the content of the child elements (wd:Education and wd:Degree) and concatenates their values into a single string. The select='*' targets all child elements of wd:Education_Group, and xsl:value-of outputs their text content (e.g., 'California University' and 'MBA' become 'California University MBA').

This approach ensures that each wd:Education_Group is transformed into a single <Degree> element with the combined text of the wd:Education and wd:Degree values, matching the example output.

Context and Output: The template operates on each wd:Education_Group, producing the nested structure shown in the Transformed_Record (e.g., <Degrees><Degree>California University MBA</Degree><Degree>Georgetown University B.S.</Degree></Degrees>), assuming a parent template or additional logic wraps the <Degree> elements in <Degrees>.

Why not the other options?

B .

xml

WrapCopy

<xsl:template match='wd:Education_Group'>

<Degree>

<xsl:value-of select='*'/>

</Degree>

</xsl:template>

This uses <xsl:value-of select='*'/> without <xsl:copy>, which outputs the concatenated text of all child elements but does not preserve any XML structure or formatting. It would produce plain text (e.g., 'California UniversityMBACalifornia UniversityB.S.') without the proper <Degree> tags, failing to match the structured output in the example.

C .

xml

WrapCopy

<xsl:template match='wd:Education_Group'>

<Degree>

<xsl:copy select='*'/>

</Degree>

</xsl:template>

This uses <xsl:copy select='*'/>, but <xsl:copy> does not take a select attribute---it simply copies the current node. This would result in an invalid XSLT syntax and fail to produce the desired output, making it incorrect.

D .

xml

WrapCopy

<xsl:template match='wd:Education_Group'>

<Degree>

<xsl:copy-of select='*'/>

</Degree>

</xsl:template>

This uses <xsl:copy-of select='*'/>, which copies all child nodes (e.g., wd:Education and wd:Degree) as-is, including their element structure, resulting in output like <Degree><wd:Education>California University</wd:Education><wd:Degree>MBA</wd:Degree></Degree>. This does not match the flattened, concatenated text format in the Transformed_Record example (e.g., <Degree>California University MBA</Degree>), making it incorrect.

To implement this in XSLT for a Workday integration:

Use the template from option A to match wd:Education_Group, apply <xsl:copy><xsl:value-of select='*'/></xsl:copy> to concatenate and output the wd:Education and wd:Degree values as a single <Degree> element. This ensures the transformation aligns with the Transformed_Record example, producing the required format for the integration output.

:

Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide: Section on 'XSLT Transformations for Workday Integrations' -- Details the use of <xsl:template>, <xsl:copy>, and <xsl:value-of> for transforming XML data, including handling grouped elements like wd:Education_Group.

Workday EIB and Web Services Guide: Chapter on 'XML and XSLT for Report Data' -- Explains the structure of Workday XML (e.g., wd:Education_Group, wd:Education, wd:Degree) and how to use XSLT to transform education data into a flattened format.

Workday Reporting and Analytics Guide: Section on 'Web Service-Enabled Reports' -- Covers integrating report outputs with XSLT for transformations, including examples of concatenating and restructuring data for third-party systems.

In Workday, when refining a custom report to include specific conditions such as limiting the output to workers hired in the last 30 days, the appropriate place to specify this condition is within the Filter tab of the custom report definition. The Filter tab allows you to define criteria that determine which instances of the primary business object (in this case, 'Worker') are included in the report output. This is critical for integrations, as the filtered data ensures that only relevant records are sent to the third-party system.

The requirement here is to restrict the report to workers hired within the last 30 days. In Workday reporting, this can be achieved by adding a filter condition on the 'Hire Date' field of the Worker business object. Specifically, you would configure the filter to compare the 'Hire Date' against a dynamic date range, such as 'Current Date minus 30 days' to 'Current Date.' This ensures the report dynamically adjusts to include only workers hired in the last 30 days each time it runs, which aligns with the needs of an integration sending real-time data to a third-party system.

Here's why the other options are incorrect:

A . Subfilter: Subfilters in Workday are used to further refine data within a related business object or a subset of data already filtered by the primary filter. They are not the primary mechanism for applying a condition to the main dataset (e.g., all workers). For this scenario, a subfilter would be unnecessary since the condition applies directly to the Worker business object, not a related object.

B . Output: The Output section of a custom report definition controls how the report is displayed or delivered (e.g., file format, scheduling), not the data selection criteria. It does not allow for specifying conditions like hire date ranges.

C . Columns: The Columns tab defines which fields are displayed in the report output (e.g., Worker ID, Name, Hire Date). While you can add the 'Hire Date' field here for visibility, it does not control which workers are included in the report---that is the role of the Filter tab.

To implement this in practice:

In the custom report definition, go to the Filter tab.

Add a new filter condition.

Select the 'Hire Date' field from the Worker business object.

Set the operator to 'in the range' and define the range as 'Current Date - 30 days' to 'Current Date' (using dynamic date functions available in Workday).

Save and test the report to ensure it returns only workers hired within the last 30 days.

This filtered report can then be enabled as a web service (via the Advanced tab) or used in an Enterprise Interface Builder (EIB) or Workday Studio integration to send the data to the third-party system, meeting the integration requirement.

Reference from Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide:

Workday Report Writer Fundamentals: Section on 'Creating and Managing Filters' explains how filters are used to limit report data based on specific conditions, such as date ranges.

Integration System Fundamentals: Discusses how custom reports serve as data sources for integrations and the importance of filters in defining the dataset.

Core Connectors & Document Transformation: Highlights the use of filtered custom reports in outbound integrations to third-party systems.