- 118 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All WGU Secure Software Design (D487, KEO1) Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | WGU |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | Secure-Software-Design |
| Exam Name: | WGU Secure Software Design (D487, KEO1) Exam |
| Exam Questions: | 118 |
| Last Updated: | April 13, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | WGU Courses and Certifications |
| Exam Tags: | Advanced Level Software Developers and Project Managers |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the WGU Secure Software Design (D487, KEO1) Exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by WGU certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our WGU Secure-Software-Design exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our WGU Secure-Software-Design exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the WGU Secure-Software-Design exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s WGU Secure-Software-Design exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
While performing functional testing of the ordering feature in the new product, a tester noticed that the order object was transmitted to the POST endpoint of the API as a human-readable JSON object.
How should existing security controls be adjusted to prevent this in the future?
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Transmitting data in a human-readable format, such as JSON, over an API can expose sensitive information if the communication channel is not secure. To protect the confidentiality and integrity of the data, it's essential to encrypt all requests and responses between clients and servers.
Implementing encryption, typically through protocols like HTTPS (which utilizes TLS/SSL), ensures that data transmitted over the network is not readable by unauthorized parties. This prevents potential attackers from intercepting and understanding the data, thereby safeguarding sensitive information contained within the API communications.
This practice is a fundamental aspect of secure software development and aligns with the Implementation business function of the OWASP SAMM. Within this function, the Secure Build practice emphasizes the importance of configuring the software to operate securely in its intended environment, which includes enforcing encryption for data in transit.
OWASP SAMM: Implementation - Secure Build
While performing functional testing of the new product from a shared machine, a QA analyst closed their browser window but did not logout of the application. A different QA analyst accessed the application an hour later and was not prompted to login. They then noticed the previous analyst was still logged into the application.
How should existing security controls be adjusted to prevent this in the future?
The issue described involves a session management vulnerability where the user's session remains active even after the browser window is closed, allowing another user on the same machine to access the application without logging in. To prevent this security risk, it's essential to adjust the session management controls to include an automatic timeout feature. This means that after a period of inactivity, or when the browser window is closed, the session should automatically expire, requiring a new login to access the application. This adjustment ensures that even if a user forgets to log out, their session won't remain active indefinitely, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
Secure SDLC practices emphasize the importance of security at every stage of the software development life cycle, including the implementation of proper session management controls12.
Best practices for access control in security highlight the significance of managing session timeouts to prevent unauthorized access3.
Industry standards and guidelines often recommend session timeouts as a critical security control to protect against unauthorized access4.
The software security team prepared a detailed schedule napping security development lifecycle phases to the type of analysis they will execute.
Which design and development deliverable aid the team prepare?
The deliverable that would aid a software security team in preparing a detailed schedule mapping security development lifecycle phases to the type of analysis they will execute is Security test plans. These plans are crucial as they outline the testing strategies and specific security tests that will be conducted during the development lifecycle to ensure the software meets the required security standards.
Security test plans are developed after the requirements and design phases and are used throughout the implementation, verification, and release phases. They include detailed instructions for security testing, criteria for success, and the types of security testing to be performed, such as static and dynamic analysis, penetration testing, and code review.
These plans are living documents that should be updated as new threats are identified and as the project evolves. They ensure that all team members understand the security goals, the risks, and the measures that need to be taken to mitigate those risks.
By having a well-defined security test plan, the team can ensure that security is not an afterthought but is integrated into every phase of the software development lifecycle, thus producing more secure software.
Which privacy impact statement requirement type defines processes to keep personal information updated and accurate?
Data integrity requirements within a privacy impact statement ensure that personal information is maintained in an accurate and up-to-date manner. This involves establishing processes to regularly review and update personal data, as well as correct any inaccuracies. These requirements are crucial for maintaining the trustworthiness of the data and ensuring that decisions made based on this information are sound and reliable.
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's guide on the Privacy Impact Assessment process emphasizes the importance of accuracy and currency of personal information1.
The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) outlines principles for data processing, including the necessity for data to be accurate and kept up to date2.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) also includes provisions for data protection impact assessments, which involve documenting processes before starting data processing3.
The product development team is preparing for the production deployment of recent feature enhancements. One morning, they noticed the amount of test data grew exponentially overnight. Most fields were filled with random characters, but some structured query language was discovered.
Which type of security development lifecycle (SDL) tool was likely being used?
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
The scenario described indicates that the system was subjected to inputs containing random data and some structured query language (SQL) statements, leading to an exponential increase in test data. This behavior is characteristic of fuzzing, a testing technique used to identify vulnerabilities by inputting a wide range of random or unexpected data into the system.
Fuzzing aims to discover coding errors and security loopholes by bombarding the application with malformed or unexpected inputs, observing how the system responds. The presence of random characters and SQL statements suggests that the fuzzing tool was testing for vulnerabilities such as SQL injection by injecting various payloads into the system.
This approach is part of the Verification business function in the OWASP SAMM, specifically within the Security Testing practice. Security testing involves evaluating the software to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited, and fuzzing is a common technique employed in this practice to ensure the robustness and security of the application.
OWASP SAMM: Verification - Security Testing
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed