Versa Networks VNX301 Exam Dumps

The exhibit shows the Add CGNAT Pool configuration with the IP Address/Range option selected. The configured address range is named Visitors, with a low address of 192.168.10.100 and a high address of 192.168.10.150. In CGNAT, this pool defines the translated source address resource used by matching NAT rules; it does not define the original inside source hosts. Therefore, matching sessions will have their source address translated to an address from this configured pool range, which makes option C correct. Versa's CGNAT configuration examples show that a rule matches original source and destination prefixes, and then attaches a translated source pool to perform NAT.

The correct answer is A. Versa documentation for internet speed tests states that before running an internet speed test, administrators must verify WAN internet connectivity and verify that CGNAT is configured on the provider organization. It also states that administrators should verify that they can retrieve the list of predeployed internet speed-test servers. If an error occurs while fetching the server list, the documentation instructs administrators to check the CGNAT and DNS configurations and then click Fetch Server List again.

This aligns with the scenario because DNS resolution and internet breakout depend on correct DNS reachability, NAT translation, and routing through the internet-facing transport. Even if DNS appears partially functional, CGNAT misconfiguration can still prevent application or HTTP test traffic from completing properly.

OSPF, BGP MED, SNMP, syslog, VRRP, and DHCP may be important in other designs, but they are not the first items Versa identifies for a failed internet speed-test server-list fetch in a DIA context.

The correct answer is A. In Versa SD-WAN traffic steering, forwarding profiles define how traffic is mapped to WAN circuits, how next hops are selected, and how traffic behaves when SLA conditions are violated. If the requirement is to stop traffic when no SLA-compliant path is available, the relevant behavior is the SLA Violation Action. Setting this option to Drop prevents the VOS device from forwarding the matching traffic over a circuit that does not satisfy the policy's SLA requirements.

This is the opposite of using Forward, which allows traffic to continue even when the available next hops violate the SLA. Forward may be appropriate for best-effort applications where degraded delivery is better than no delivery, but it is not appropriate for strict business-critical applications that must not use a degraded path.

Nexthop Failure Action controls how the system behaves when a next hop fails, such as waiting for recovery or re-evaluating. Header compression affects packet overhead, and the recompute timer controls periodic recalculation timing. None of those settings directly enforce ''drop when SLA is not met.''

The correct answer is B. The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start. Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as ''exchange start,'' followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.

Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart. Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.

The correct answer is C. Versa documentation states that for Releases 22.1.3 and later, the speed test factors in network latency to derive results. In these releases, the speed test is performed in three stages: a ping test, an upload test, and a download test. The ping test calculates link latency, and the speed test uses that latency data while performing the upload and download portions.

The same documentation notes that the speed test can measure bandwidth speeds up to 1 Gbps, with actual measurement depending on factors such as in-path shapers and latency. It also states that the test may use up to 45 MB of data per upload or download in the best case and 90 MB for a complete test.

Older releases behave differently. For Releases 21.2 and earlier, the speed test is performed in two stages: upload and download. Therefore, because the question specifically states Release 22.1.3 on both client and server, the correct sequence is ping, upload, and download.