Palo Alto Networks SSE-Engineer Exam Dumps

Palo Alto Networks best practices and the behavior of Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) dictate that predefined or default objects, including profile groups like 'Default Prisma Profile,' cannot be directly modified. These default objects serve as baseline configurations and are often locked to prevent accidental or unintended changes that could impact the overall security posture.

The intern's experience of the options being greyed out when selecting 'Default Prisma Profile' is a direct indication of this immutability of default objects.

Therefore, the correct action is to:

Create a new Profile Group: The intern should create a new profile group within the appropriate configuration scope (likely GlobalProtect, given the task).

Configure the new Profile Group: In this new profile group, the intern can select the desired Anti-Spyware Profile (which might be an existing custom profile or a new one they create).

Modify Security Rules: The security rules currently using the 'Default Prisma Profile' in the GlobalProtect folder need to be modified to use this newly created profile group.

Let's analyze why the other options are incorrect based on official documentation:

A . Request edit access for the GlobalProtect scope. While having the correct scope permissions is necessary for making any changes within GlobalProtect, it will not override the inherent immutability of default objects like 'Default Prisma Profile.' Edit access will allow the intern to create new objects and modify rules, but not directly edit the default profile group.

B . Change the configuration scope to Prisma Access and modify the profile group. The image shows that 'Default Prisma Profile' has a 'Location' of 'Prisma Access.' However, even within the Prisma Access scope, default profile groups are generally not directly editable. The issue is not the scope but the fact that it's a default object.

D . Modify the existing anti-spyware profile, because best-practice profiles cannot be removed from a group. The question is about changing the profile group, not the individual Anti-Spyware Profile. While 'best-practice' profiles might be part of default groups, the core issue is the inability to modify the default group itself. Creating a new group allows the intern to choose which Anti-Spyware Profile to include.

In summary, the fundamental principle in Palo Alto Networks management is that default objects are typically read-only to ensure a consistent and predictable baseline. To make changes, you need to create custom objects.

When configuring Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) in Prisma Access (Managed by Strata Cloud Manager) for mobile users, a URL access management profile must be created with the site access action set to 'Isolate'. This profile is then applied to a Security policy to enforce isolation for specific URLs. This ensures that web traffic to designated high-risk or untrusted sites is redirected to a remote, secure browser instance, protecting endpoints from potential web-based threats.

SaaS Security Inline allows engineers to customize the risk scores assigned to different SaaS applications based on various factors. By manipulating these risk scores, you can influence how these applications are treated within Security policies.

To limit the use of unsanctioned SaaS applications:

Lower the risk score of sanctioned applications: This makes them less likely to trigger policies designed to restrict high-risk activities.

Increase the risk score of unsanctioned applications: This elevates their perceived risk, making them more likely to be caught by Security policies configured to block or limit access based on risk score thresholds.

Then, you would create Security policies that take action (e.g., block access, restrict features) based on these adjusted risk scores. For example, a policy could be configured to block access to any SaaS application with a risk score above a certain threshold, which would primarily target the unsanctioned applications with their inflated scores.

Let's analyze why the other options are incorrect based on official documentation:

B . Increase the risk score for all SaaS applications to automatically block unwanted applications. Increasing the risk score for all SaaS applications, including sanctioned ones, would lead to unintended blocking and disruption of legitimate business activities. Risk score customization is intended for differentiation, not a blanket increase.

C . Build an application filter using unsanctioned SaaS as the category. While creating an application filter based on the 'unsanctioned SaaS' category is a valid way to identify these applications, it directly filters based on the category itself, not the risk score. Risk score customization provides a more nuanced approach where you can define thresholds and potentially allow some low-risk activities within unsanctioned applications while blocking higher-risk ones.

D . Build an application filter using unsanctioned SaaS as the characteristic. Similar to option C, using 'unsanctioned SaaS' as a characteristic in an application filter allows you to directly target these applications. However, it doesn't leverage the risk score customization feature to control access based on a graduated level of risk.

Therefore, the most effective way to use risk score customization to limit unsanctioned SaaS application usage is by lowering the risk scores of sanctioned applications and increasing the risk scores of unsanctioned ones, and then building Security policies that act upon these adjusted risk scores.

Prisma Access applies security rules in a hierarchical order, where rules at higher levels take precedence over those at lower levels. If a more permissive rule is placed higher in the hierarchy, it may allow traffic before the restrictive Web Security rule is evaluated. To resolve this, the engineer should reorder the rules to ensure the restrictive Web Security rule is positioned higher in the hierarchy so it is applied before any broader or conflicting rules.

In a Panorama Managed Prisma Access multitenant environment, Access Domains provide granular role-based access control (RBAC). By defining an Access Domain, the network security team can be granted full administrative privileges for a specific tenant's configuration while ensuring they cannot access or modify other tenants. This method enforces proper segmentation and ensures compliance with multitenant security policies.