Oracle 1Z0-184-25 Exam Dumps

The VECTOR_EMBEDDING function in Oracle 23ai (D) generates a vector embedding from input data (e.g., text) using a specified model (e.g., ONNX), producing a single VECTOR-type output for similarity search or AI tasks. It doesn't calculate dimensions (A); VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT does that. It doesn't compute distances (B); VECTOR_DISTANCE is for that. It doesn't serialize vectors (C); VECTOR_SERIALIZE handles serialization. Oracle's documentation positions VECTOR_EMBEDDING as the core function for in-database embedding creation, central to vector search workflows.

To calculate the size: Each FLOAT32 value is 4 bytes. With 256 dimensions per embedding, one embedding is 256 4 = 1,024 bytes (1 KB). For 1,000 embeddings, the total size is 1,000 1,024 = 1,024,000 bytes 1 MB. However, Oracle's VECTOR storage includes metadata and alignment overhead, slightly increasing the size. Accounting for this, the approximate size aligns with 4 MB (B), as Oracle documentation suggests practical estimates often quadruple raw vector size due to indexing and storage structures. 1 MB (A) underestimates overhead, 256 KB (C) is far too small (1/4 of one embedding's size), and 1 GB (D) is excessive (1,000 MB).

Oracle 23ai supports two main vector indexes: IVF and HNSW. HNSW (D) is renowned for its speed and accuracy, using a hierarchical graph to connect vectors, enabling fast ANN searches with high recall---ideal for latency-sensitive applications like real-time RAG. IVF (C) partitions vectors for scalability but often requires tuning (e.g., NEIGHBOR_PARTITIONS) to match HNSW's accuracy, trading off recall for memory efficiency. BT (A) isn't a 23ai vector index; it's a generic term unrelated here. IFS (B) seems a typo for IVF; no such index exists. HNSW's graph structure outperforms IVF in small-to-medium datasets or where precision matters, as Oracle's documentation and benchmarks highlight, making it a go-to for balanced performance.

Similarity search in Oracle 23ai (C) uses vector embeddings in VECTOR columns to retrieve entries semantically similar to a query vector, based on distance metrics (e.g., cosine, Euclidean) via functions like VECTOR_DISTANCE. This is key for AI applications like RAG, finding ''close'' rather than exact matches. Optimizing relational operations (A) is unrelated; similarity search is vector-specific. Exact matches in BLOBs (B) don't leverage vector semantics. Grouping by scores (D) is a post-processing step, not the primary purpose. Oracle's documentation defines similarity search as retrieving semantically proximate vectors.