- 408 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Microsoft |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | SC-200 |
| Exam Name: | Microsoft Security Operations Analyst |
| Exam Questions: | 408 |
| Last Updated: | October 9, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Microsoft Azure |
| Exam Tags: | Associate Azure Security Operations Analyst |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Microsoft Security Operations Analyst exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Microsoft certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Microsoft SC-200 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Microsoft SC-200 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Microsoft SC-200 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Microsoft SC-200 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
You have a Microsoft Sentinel workspace.
You receive multiple alerts for failed sign in attempts to an account.
You identify that the alerts are false positives.
You need to prevent additional failed sign-in alerts from being generated for the account. The solution must meet the following requirements.
* Ensure that failed sign-in alerts are generated for other accounts.
* Minimize administrative effort
What should do?
In Microsoft Sentinel, when you identify an alert as a false positive for a specific account, the most efficient way to suppress future alerts for that entity---without affecting others---is to use an automation rule.
Microsoft Sentinel documentation explains:
''Automation rules can automatically close incidents or suppress alerts based on conditions such as user, IP, or entity name. This helps reduce noise and prevent false positives without modifying analytics rules or affecting other entities.''
By configuring an automation rule to auto-close or suppress alerts where the username equals the known account, Sentinel will prevent new alerts for that account while continuing normal detection for others.
Other options are incorrect:
Watchlist (B) only stores reference data; it doesn't suppress alerts.
Modify analytics rule (C) affects all users, not just one account.
Activity templates (D) are used for entity behavior analysis, not alert suppression.
Correct answer: A. Create an automation rule
You have an Azure Sentinel workspace.
You need to test a playbook manually in the Azure portal. From where can you run the test in Azure Sentinel?
In Microsoft Sentinel, playbooks (Logic Apps) that are connected to Sentinel are most commonly run in context of an incident. From the Incidents blade, you select an incident, then choose Actions Run playbook to trigger a manual test against that specific incident's entities and alert context. This is the recommended way to validate playbook inputs (entities, alert details, incident properties) and permissions end-to-end without changing analytics rules. While the Playbooks blade shows the Logic Apps and their connections, the incident view is where Sentinel exposes manual execution with full security operations context (assignments, comments, evidence), which is what ''test a playbook manually in the Azure portal (from Sentinel)'' refers to.
You have a Microsoft Entra tenant and a Microsoft Sentinel workspace named Workspacel.
You need to configure the long-term retention of Microsoft Entra audit logs in Workspace1 The solution must maximize the retention of the logs. To what should you set the retention period?
For Microsoft Entra audit logs ingested into a Microsoft Sentinel workspace, the maximum retention period is determined by the workspace's analytics retention setting. Microsoft Sentinel workspaces support two retention tiers:
To maximize the retention of Microsoft Entra audit logs specifically in a Sentinel workspace, you should set the workspace analytics retention period to 90 days. This is the maximum retention period supported for hot storage in a Log Analytics workspace, which directly backs your Sentinel workspace. Beyond 90 days, data would require moving to a storage account for archival purposes, but within the workspace itself, 90 days represents the maximum retention setting available.
You have an Azure subscription that uses Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
You need to ensure that you can allow or block a user-specified range of IP addresses and URLs.
What should you enable first in the advanced features from the Endpoints Settings in the Microsoft 365 Defender portal?
In Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, before administrators can allow or block user-specified IPs or URLs, the feature ''Custom network indicators'' must be enabled under Advanced Features in the Microsoft 365 Defender portal.
This capability allows defining Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) at the network level to enforce allow/block decisions for specific domains, URLs, or IP ranges. Once enabled, Defender for Endpoint agents enforce these network indicators across managed endpoints.
Other features like EDR in block mode or Web content filtering provide automatic blocking, not manual IP/URL control.
Correct Answer: B. custom network indicators
Your company uses Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
The company has Microsoft Word documents that contain macros. The documents are used frequently on the devices of the company's accounting team.
You need to hide false positive in the Alerts queue, while maintaining the existing security posture. Which three actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
When dealing with frequent false positives in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alerts, such as those triggered by legitimate Office macros, the best practice is to hide false alerts while maintaining overall protection.
Microsoft Defender documentation prescribes the following approach:
Generate the alert (E): The alert must first appear in the queue so it can be reviewed and correctly classified.
Hide the alert (B): Analysts can hide individual alerts to clean up the queue without disabling detections or reducing coverage.
Create a suppression rule scoped to a device group (D): To prevent recurrence, suppression rules should be scoped narrowly (such as to a device group like the accounting team's devices), maintaining the principle of least privilege and minimal impact.
Options A (Resolve automatically) and C (Suppress any device) would reduce visibility or broaden suppression excessively, potentially missing real threats.
This combination of actions aligns with Defender XDR's alert management best practices, ensuring a balance between reducing noise and preserving security posture.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed