Microsoft GH-900 Exam Dumps

GitHub Desktop is a graphical interface that allows users to interact with GitHub repositories. It simplifies certain Git operations without the need for command-line usage.

GitHub Desktop Capabilities:

Option C is correct because GitHub Desktop allows users to add local repositories to their GitHub account, clone repositories from GitHub to their local machine, and manage repositories effectively.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because GitHub Desktop does not support creating or managing issues directly; this is done through the GitHub web interface.

Option B is incorrect because reviewing and approving pull requests is also managed through the GitHub web interface.

Option D is incorrect because commenting on discussions is done on the GitHub platform, not through GitHub Desktop.

Option E is incorrect because GitHub Desktop does not integrate with office suite software.

GitHub Docs: GitHub Desktop Documentation

In GitHub Actions workflows, actions can be referenced from various sources depending on the needs of the workflow.

Any Public Repository:

Option A is correct. Actions can be referenced from any public GitHub repository, allowing the reuse of shared actions across multiple projects.

The Same Repository as Your Workflow File:

Option B is correct. Actions stored in the same repository as the workflow file can be referenced directly, which is common for custom actions specific to that project.

A Published Docker Container Image on Docker Hub:

Option E is correct. Workflows can reference actions that are provided as Docker container images hosted on Docker Hub, allowing integration of complex tools and environments.

Incorrect Options:

Option C (GitHub Packages) is incorrect as it is more commonly used for storing and managing dependencies, not actions.

Option D (An enterprise marketplace) is incorrect because GitHub Actions are not directly referenced from an enterprise marketplace but rather from public repositories or Docker images.

GitHub Docs: Reusing Workflows

GitHub provides several pre-defined repository roles that determine the level of access and permissions a user has within a repository. The roles that are included by default are:

Triage: Allows users to manage issues and pull requests without write access to the code.

Maintain: Provides more extensive access, including managing settings, but without full administrative control.

Write: Grants permission to push changes and manage issues and pull requests.

Roles like 'Security' and 'Delete' are not standard pre-defined roles, and 'View' is generally referred to as 'Read' in GitHub's permission structure.

GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Enterprise Managed Users (EMU) integrates closely with an organization's identity provider (IdP), such as Azure Active Directory, to manage user accounts. The primary benefit of this setup is centralized control and streamlined management. It allows organizations to enforce policies, manage user permissions, and provision or deprovision accounts directly through their IdP, ensuring consistency and security across the organization. This approach is ideal for large enterprises that require tight control over their users and resources.

The CODEOWNERS file in a GitHub repository is used to define individuals or teams that are responsible for specific parts of the codebase. When changes are made to files or directories that match the patterns specified in the CODEOWNERS file, GitHub automatically requests reviews from the listed code owners.

Setting Reviewers Automatically:

Option D is correct because the primary purpose of a CODEOWNERS file is to automatically set reviewers for pull requests that affect the specified files or directories. This ensures that the appropriate team members are notified and review the changes before they are merged.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because the CODEOWNERS file does not restrict who can edit specific files; it only influences who is required to review changes.

Option B is partially related but not fully accurate because while CODEOWNERS does require certain reviews, it does not mandate peer review for all code changes.

Option C is incorrect because the CODEOWNERS file does not define access permissions for the repository; it deals with code review processes.

GitHub Docs: About CODEOWNERS

GitHub Blog: Automatically Requesting Reviews with CODEOWNERS