- 96 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Service Provider Routing and Switching, Professional Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Juniper |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | JN0-664 |
| Exam Name: | Service Provider Routing and Switching, Professional Exam |
| Exam Questions: | 96 |
| Last Updated: | August 5, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Juniper Service Provider Routing & Switching Certification |
| Exam Tags: | Professional Juniper networking professionals |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Juniper Service Provider Routing and Switching, Professional Exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Juniper certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Juniper JN0-664 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Juniper JN0-664 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Juniper JN0-664 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Juniper JN0-664 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Refer to the exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button.
PE-1 and PE-2 are configured with LDP-signaled pseudowires to provide connectivity between CE-1 and CE-2. You notice no connectivity exists between CE-1 and CE-2.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements describe potential causes for this fault? (Choose two.)
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which three statements are correct about route 10 0 0.0/16 when using the default BGP advertisement rules'? (Choose three.)
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, a working L3VPN exists that connects VPN-A sites CoS is configured correctly to match on the MPLS EXP bits of the LSP, but when traffic is sent from Site-1 to Site-2, PE-2 is not classifying the traffic correctly
What should you do to solve the problem?
Understanding the Problem in MPLS CoS Classification
How EXP Bits Are Used for CoS in MPLS
Traffic is sent from VPN-A Site-1 CE-1 PE-1 P-1 PE-2 CE-2.
The MPLS LSP (Label Switched Path) from PE-1 to PE-2 is expected to carry MPLS EXP bits, which are used for Class of Service (CoS) classification.
PE-2 should classify traffic based on EXP bits received in the MPLS label.
What Happens with PHP (Penultimate Hop Popping)?
By default, the penultimate router (P-1) pops the top MPLS label before sending the packet to PE-2.
Since the EXP bits are in the top MPLS label, they get removed along with the label.
This means that PE-2 no longer sees the correct EXP bits, leading to incorrect traffic classification.
Solution: Configure Explicit-Null on PE-2
Explicit Null (explicit-null) must be configured on PE-2 to ensure that P-1 does NOT remove the MPLS label.
Instead of removing the label, P-1 will send a label of 0 (for IPv4) or 2 (for IPv6) to PE-2.
This preserves the MPLS EXP bits, allowing PE-2 to classify the traffic correctly.
Evaluating the Answer Choices Again
B. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-2.
Correct, because:
PE-2 is the egress LSR, where Ultimate Hop Popping (UHP) must be enabled.
Configuring explicit-null ensures that P-1 does not remove the label, preserving the EXP bits for CoS classification at PE-2.
Configuration on PE-2:
set protocols mpls explicit-null
Juniper Documentation Reference:
'Explicit-null must be configured on the egress LSR to prevent PHP from removing the top MPLS label, thereby preserving the EXP bits.'
A. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-1.
Incorrect, because:
Explicit-null must be configured on the egress LSR (PE-2), not the ingress LSR (PE-1).
PE-1 only labels the traffic but does not control PHP behavior on P-1.
C. Configure VPN prefix mapping for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP.
Incorrect, because:
VPN prefix mapping is used for mapping VPN routes to LSPs but does not solve the EXP bit issue.
The problem here is label removal (PHP), not route mapping.
D. Set a static CoS value for the PE-1_to-PE-2 LSP.
Incorrect, because:
This does not preserve the original EXP bits, it only applies a static CoS value.
It's a workaround, not a fix.
Final Answer: B. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-2.
Key Takeaways
Penultimate Hop Popping (PHP) removes the outer MPLS label at P-1, which also removes the EXP bits used for CoS classification.
To keep EXP bits intact, configure explicit-null on the egress PE (PE-2).
This forces P-1 to send a label (0 for IPv4, 2 for IPv6) to PE-2, preserving the EXP bits for CoS classification.
Official Juniper Documentation Reference
Juniper MPLS CoS and PHP Behavior Guide
'To retain CoS EXP bits at the egress LSR, configure explicit-null on the egress PE. This prevents PHP from stripping the MPLS label before reaching the final PE router.'
Which two statements are correct regarding bootstrap messages that are forwarded within a PIM sparse mode domain? (Choose two.)
Bootstrap messages are PIM messages that are used to distribute rendezvous point (RP) information dynamically during an RP election. Bootstrap messages are sent by bootstrap routers (BSRs), which are routers that are elected to perform the RP discovery function for a PIM sparse-mode domain. Bootstrap messages contain information about candidate RPs and their multicast groups, as well as BSR priority and hash mask length. Bootstrap messages are forwarded to all routers within a PIM sparse-mode domain using hop-by-hop flooding.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed