- 72 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Juniper |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | JN0-650 |
| Exam Name: | Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional |
| Exam Questions: | 72 |
| Last Updated: | August 4, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching |
| Exam Tags: |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Juniper certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Juniper JN0-650 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Juniper JN0-650 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Juniper JN0-650 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Juniper JN0-650 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
An incorrectly configured routing policy at your service provider led to several hundred thousand routes being placed in your edge router's routing table In this scenario, how would you limit the number of prefixes received on a BGP peer session?
When a peer incorrectly floods your router with an excessive number of routes, it can exhaust system resources and crash the routing engine.
Prefix-Limit (Option B): The prefix-limit (or accepted-prefix-limit) parameter is the primary defense against such 'route leaks'.
You can set a maximum threshold for the number of prefixes allowed from a specific BGP neighbor or group.
When the limit is reached, Junos can be configured to either just log a warning or tear down the BGP session entirely (using the teardown keyword) to protect the router.
This prevents the 'hundreds of thousand routes' from ever being fully processed or installed into the main routing table.
Damping (Option A): Damping is used to suppress unstable, 'flapping' routes, but it does not limit the total volume of stable routes received.
Your organization uses 802 1X with a RADIUS server. If the RADIUS server stops responding, you want the fallback action to continue to permit access for devices that currently have authorization but deny any new access attempts.
Which fallback action provides this capability?
Junos OS 24.4 provides several server-failover options for 802.1X authentication to maintain network availability when the RADIUS server is unreachable.
Fallback Behavior (Option D): The use-cache fallback action allows the switch to consult its local cache of previously authenticated MAC addresses.
If a device was already authorized and its information is in the cache, the switch will continue to permit access based on those cached credentials.
However, if a new device (not in the cache) attempts to connect while the server is down, the switch cannot verify its credentials and will deny the access attempt. This matches the specific requirement to permit authorized devices while denying new ones.
Other Fallback Options:
permit (Option C): This would allow all devices (even new ones) to access the network, typically in a restricted 'guest' or 'bypass' VLAN.
deny (Option A): This would drop all traffic from all devices on the port if the server is unreachable.
vlan-name (Option B): This moves authenticated or unauthenticated users into a specific fallback VLAN.
Which statement about LLDP and LLDP-MED operations on EX Series devices is correct?
Junos OS 24.4 on EX Series switches provides robust support for LLDP (Link Layer Discovery Protocol) and its extension, LLDP-MED (Media Endpoint Discovery).
LLDP-MED Power Negotiation: This feature allows a switch (Power Sourcing Equipment or PSE) and a connected device (Powered Device or PD), such as an IP phone or access point, to negotiate power requirements beyond the standard IEEE 802.3af/at classes. The switch can dynamically allocate the exact amount of power the device needs (in 0.1W increments), which optimizes the power budget of the switch.
LLDP Scope: LLDP is a Link Layer protocol (Layer 2), but it is not restricted to Layer 2 interfaces; it can also operate on Layer 3 interfaces to advertise system identity and capabilities. This makes Option A incorrect.
Link-Local Protocol: LLDP frames use a specific multicast MAC address (01:80:c2:00:00:0e) that is not flooded or forwarded by switches. They are strictly link-local between two directly connected neighbors. This makes Option B incorrect.
Endpoint Focus: LLDP-MED is specifically designed for Media Endpoint Devices (like VoIP phones), providing TLVs for network policy (VLAN/QoS), location identification, and inventory management. Standard LLDP is used for discovering network connectivity devices. This makes Option D incorrect.
You have created a private community VLAN called RND The private community VLAN works fine within switch S1, but traffic in the private RND community VLAN does not reach VLAN members connected to switch S2.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?
Private VLANs (PVLANs) allow for granular port isolation within a single broadcast domain. When extending a PVLAN across multiple switches (S1 to S2), the secondary VLANs (Community or Isolated) must be preserved across the trunk links.
802.1Q Tagging (Option B): For traffic from a Community VLAN (RND) to reach members on a different switch, the Community VLAN must have its own 802.1Q VLAN tag (VLAN ID) associated with it. When a frame from a community port on S1 traverses the trunk to S2, it is tagged with this specific secondary VLAN ID. S2 receives the tagged frame, identifies it as belonging to the RND community, and forwards it to the appropriate community or promiscuous ports.
Why it fails without a tag: If the RND community is only defined locally on S1 without a global VLAN ID, the trunk port will not know how to distinguish that traffic from the Primary VLAN or other communities.
Incorrect Options: Option A is incorrect because the community VLAN must have a different tag than the parent (Primary) VLAN to maintain the internal PVLAN logic. Option C is incorrect because stripping tags would lead to the traffic being merged into the native VLAN or dropped. Option D is incorrect because RND is a community VLAN; changing it to an isolated VLAN would change its behavior (preventing communication between members of that same group).
You run a multivendor switching environment where you have configured VSTP. You have 450 VLANs and notice that some of your VLANs do not function properly. How should you change the configuration to get all 450 VLANs working?
VSTP (VLAN Spanning Tree Protocol) is Juniper's implementation that provides a separate spanning tree instance for each VLAN, ensuring compatibility with Cisco's PVST+. However, it has significant scaling limitations:
Instance Limits: On many Juniper EX and QFX series switches, VSTP is restricted to a maximum of 253 or 510 VLAN instances depending on the software version (ELS vs. non-ELS). In your scenario, having 450 VLANs exceeds the standard 253-instance limit found on many platforms.
The Solution (Option B): When the number of VLANs exceeds the VSTP capacity, the recommended best practice is to enable RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol). Unlike VSTP, RSTP runs a single spanning tree instance for the entire switch, regardless of how many VLANs are configured. This ensures that all 450 VLANs are protected from loops without hitting the hardware's instance-count limit.
Other Options: Option A (force-version) only affects the BPDU format for compatibility but doesn't solve the instance limit. Option C and Option D are parameter tuning actions that do not address the architectural limitation of the number of running instances.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed