ISTQB CTAL-TM Exam Dumps

An iterative/incremental lifecycle model is a type of software development lifecycle that divides the project into smaller iterations or increments, each delivering a part of the functionality and undergoing its own planning, analysis, design, implementation, and testing phases1.This model is suitable for projects that have aggressive schedules, unclear requirements, new technologies, distributed teams, and high quality expectations, as it allows for early feedback, risk reduction, parallel development, frequent delivery, and continuous improvement2. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.Option A is incorrect because a spiral model is a type of iterative/incremental model that adds risk analysis and prototyping activities to each iteration3.While this model can also handle unclear requirements, new technologies, and high quality expectations, it may not be the best choice for projects that have aggressive schedules and distributed teams, as it requires more time and communication for risk assessment and prototyping4.Option C is incorrect because a V-model is a type of sequential model that maps each development phase to a corresponding testing phase in a V-shaped diagram5. This model is suitable for projects that have clear and stable requirements, well-known technologies, co-located teams, and moderate quality expectations, as it allows for early verification, traceability, and defect prevention. However, this model may not be the best choice for projects that have aggressive schedules, unclear requirements, new technologies, distributed teams, and high quality expectations, as it does not allow for early feedback, risk reduction, parallel development, frequent delivery, and continuous improvement. Option D is incorrect because a waterfall model is a type of sequential model that follows a linear sequence of phases from requirements to deployment. This model is suitable for projects that have simple and fixed requirements, well-known technologies, co-located teams, and low quality expectations, as it allows for easy planning, management, and documentation.However, this model may not be the best choice for projects that have aggressive schedules, unclear requirements, new technologies, distributed teams, and high quality expectations, as it does not allow for early feedback, risk reduction, parallel development, frequent delivery, and continuous improvement.Reference:1: ISTQB Glossary, Iterative/incremental lifecycle model2: ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus, Section 1.2.13: ISTQB Glossary, Spiral model4: ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus, Section 1.2.15: ISTQB Glossary, V-model : ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus, Section 1.2.1 : ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus, Section 1.2.1 : ISTQB Glossary, Waterfall model : ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus, Section 1.2.1 : ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus, Section 1.2.1

Understanding the IDEAL Model:

The IDEAL model (Initiating, Diagnosing, Establishing, Acting, Learning) is a framework for process improvement.

In this case, the Learning phase is missing, which involves evaluating the outcomes of implemented changes to identify what worked and what did not.

Evaluation of Options:

A (Diagnosing) and B (Establishing) refer to earlier stages of the model.

C (Acting) relates to implementing changes but does not address the lack of retrospective evaluation.

D is correct as the problem lies in not assessing the success of past improvements.

Reference and Syllabus Alignment:

The IDEAL model is covered under 'Improving the Testing Process' (TM-1.5.4) in the ISTQB syllabus

Context Analysis:

Building a custom tool may address traceability and customization needs, but ongoing costs such as maintenance are critical for sustainable implementation.

Evaluation of Options:

A . Relative benefits to your vendors:

Incorrect. Vendor benefits are not directly relevant if the decision is to build an internal tool.

B . Maintenance costs:

Correct. Maintenance includes long-term support, updates, and potential scalability, essential considerations for internally developed tools.

C . Licensing fees to other parts of the organization:

Incorrect. The question assumes the tool is internally built, so external licensing fees do not apply.

D . Reduction of manual repetitive testing:

Incorrect. While desirable, this is an indirect benefit and not the primary focus of decision-making in tool development.

Syllabus Alignment: ISTQB syllabus emphasizes the need to evaluate long-term costs (e.g., maintenance) when adopting or developing tools (TM-1.6.2).

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Management Syllabus

The correct answer is D. Create the traceability between the test cases and the requirements. This is because traceability is the ability to follow the life of a requirement, in both a forward and backward direction, through its documentation, development, and testing. Traceability can help to ensure that the test cases are derived from the requirements, and that they cover all the relevant aspects of the system. By creating the traceability between the test cases and the requirements concurrently with creating the test cases, the test team can improve the quality and completeness of the test design, and facilitate the test analysis and reporting.Traceability Matrix - ISTQB not-for-profit associationReference:Certified Tester Advanced Level Test Manager (CTAL-TM) - ISTQB not-for-profit association,ISTQB Test Manager Certification - ISTQB Exams Worldwide - ISTQB Official Registration,Traceability Matrix - ISTQB not-for-profit association