- 40 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All ISTQB Usability Testing Certification Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | ISTQB |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | CT-UT |
| Exam Name: | ISTQB Usability Testing Certification |
| Exam Questions: | 40 |
| Last Updated: | February 25, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | ISTQB Usability Testing Certification |
| Exam Tags: | Specialist Level usability testersusability engineersSoftware testers |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the ISTQB Usability Testing Certification exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by ISTQB certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our ISTQB CT-UT exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our ISTQB CT-UT exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the ISTQB CT-UT exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s ISTQB CT-UT exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Your project manager asked you for your advice. A recent project failed because the users were not satisfied with the final product, although your project manager claimed that she followed the human-centered design process. She interviewed users at the start of the project, created a first prototype and evaluated that prototype.
Which part of the human-centered design process did she miss?
Human-centered design is cyclical: after evaluating a prototype, you must iterate - refining the design based on feedback and then re-testing - to converge on a solution that truly meets user needs.
As an expert for usability, you're in charge of the usability part of the development of a business application for a large customer. You have worked as a usability expert with the development team for two years and are operating well together; the developers value your feedback and give their bests implementing your suggestions. The product is in an early stage, so there's only a rudimentary prototype available.
Given this information, what is the best approach to verify the usability at the current stage?
With only a rudimentary prototype and deep collaboration already in place, an expert-based review (e.g., heuristic evaluation or cognitive walkthrough) delivers fast, actionable insights without the overhead of formal lab testing or recruiting users. This aligns perfectly with the early prototype stage and your strong working relationship with the developers.
Which of the following is the correct distinction between formative and summative usability evaluation?
Formative evaluations are conducted during development to identify and fix usability issues as they arise, guiding iterative design improvements. Summative evaluations are performed after a design is stable to measure its overall effectiveness and compare it against benchmarks or requirements.
Usability reviews aim to identify potential usability problems based on certain criteri
a. Which of the following is a reasonable criterion for a usability review?
Usability reviews are grounded in established guidelines, such as ISO 9241-110 or Nielsen's heuristics, that specify how interfaces should behave to support effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. These standards provide objective criteria against which an expert can judge a design's usability.
A large customer complained that a business application developed by your company sometimes transfers the wrong amount of money to clients, although there are no complaints of the actual users. The expected amount differs from the actually transferred amount by a factor of 10 or 100. After analyzing the log files, you found out that the application itself works fine. The problem seems to be caused by confusing text fields and labels for the decimal place, leading to user errors.
Which usability risk should be reasonably addressed for the next release?
When UI ambiguity around decimal placement leads to substantial mis-payments, the primary usability risk is the financial and legal liability that arises from users making costly errors, not general dissatisfaction or support calls.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed