iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Dumps

A main objective of a pilot project for introducing a new test tool into an organization is to learn more detail about the tool and how it fits with existing processes. states this as follows:

A pilot project should be conducted before introducing a new test tool into an organization in order to learn more about how to use it effectively and efficiently in your context and how it will interact with other tools and processes.

A pilot project is not meant to immediately save cost for current projects in your organisation (A), as it may require additional resources and time to set up and evaluate the tool. A pilot project is not meant to show competitors that your organisation is improving its test process (B), as it is an internal activity that may not be visible or relevant to external parties. A pilot project is not meant to motivate the test team and make testers feel valued , as it may cause resistance or frustration if the tool is not suitable or easy to use.

After completing the tool selection and a successful proof-of-concept, introducing the selected tool into an organization generally starts with a pilot project, which has the following objectives12:

Gaining in-depth knowledge about the tool, understanding both its strengths and weaknesses

Evaluating how the tool fits with existing processes and practices, and determining what would need to change

Assessing whether the benefits will be achieved at reasonable cost

Identifying and resolving any technical and organizational issues before deploying the tool on a larger scale

Providing training, coaching, and mentoring for users of the tool

Defining metrics to measure the success of the tool deployment

Therefore, the option D is the most typical objective of running a pilot project, as it is essential to ensure the compatibility and suitability of the tool with the current way of working, and to identify any potential risks or challenges that may arise from the tool introduction12.

The other options are not typical objectives of running a pilot project, because they are either part of the tool selection process, or the outcomes of the pilot project. They are:

To establish whether the tool is available for a free trial period (and for how long) (A).This is part of the tool selection process, which involves gathering information about the tool features, costs, support, and availability12.This should be done before running a pilot project, as it helps to narrow down the list of potential tools and to conduct a proof-of-concept12.

To provide training, coaching, and mentoring for users of the tool (B).This is an outcome of the pilot project, which aims to increase the competence and confidence of the tool users and to facilitate the tool adoption12.This should be done during and after the pilot project, as it helps to ensure the effective and efficient use of the tool and to address any issues or feedback from the users12.

To develop a clear set of requirements and objective criteria against which the tool can be evaluated .This is also part of the tool selection process, which involves defining the tool requirements based on the needs and expectations of the stakeholders, and establishing the evaluation criteria based on the benefits and risks of the tool12.This should also be done before running a pilot project, as it helps to compare and rank the potential tools and to select the most suitable one12.

ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 syllabus

Chapter 6 - Tool Support for Testing | PPT

Code coverage can be used to ensure that all code is exercised by tests, because it measures how much of the code or functionality of the software under test has been exercised by the test cases . Code coverage can help to identify untested or dead code, improve test design, and assess test quality . The other options are not true statements about code coverage. Option A is false, because 100% code coverage does not imply 100% coverage of requirements, as there may be defects or gaps in the requirements or in the mapping between requirements and code . Option B is false, because 100% code coverage does not guarantee that there are no coding errors, as there may be logical or functional errors that are not detected by code coverage . Option D is false, because code coverage does not ensure that all decisions are correctly implemented in the code, as it only measures whether the decisions are executed or not, but not whether they produce the correct results .

Use case testing does not find defects caused by interaction of different components is the statement that is false about use case testing. Use case testing is a technique to create test cases based on use cases, which are descriptions of how a system interacts with one or more actors (users or other systems) to achieve a specific goal or function.Use case testing can find defects caused by interaction of different components, as use cases often involve multiple components working together to provide a service or functionality to an actor2explains use case testing as follows:

Use case testing is a technique that helps us identify test cases that exercise the whole system on a transaction by transaction basis from start to finish. It is a functional black box testing technique.

Use cases are prepared by analysts and domain experts who document the functional requirements of a system from an end-user perspective. Each use case typically has a mainstream scenario and may have alternate or exceptional scenarios that describe different paths or outcomes.

Use case testing can help to verify that all the interactions between actors and the system under test work as expected and meet the user requirements. It can also help to detect integration defects between different components or subsystems.

A, B, and D are correct statements about use case testing. Use case generally has a mainstream scenario and may have many alternate or exceptional scenarios (A), as use cases describe different paths or outcomes depending on various conditions or events. A use case can be defined at different levels of abstraction, such as user goal level, summary level, subfunction level, etc., but not at the abstract level detached from the implementation or at the system level describing a set of executed functions (B), as use cases always describe interactions between actors and systems rather than abstract concepts or functions. Each use case has preconditions which need to be met for the use case to work successfully (D), as preconditions specify what must be true before a use case can begin.

Functional and Structural tests are two different test design techniques, not test levels or test types. They can be applied at any test level (Unit, Integration, System, Acceptance) and for any test type (Functional, Non-functional, Regression, Maintenance). Therefore, option A is the correct answer. Option B is incorrect because Functional tests can be performed at any test level, not just Unit and Integration. Option C is incorrect because Functional and Structural are not test levels, but test design techniques. Option D is incorrect because Structural tests can be performed at any test level, not just Unit.