Isaca CGEIT Exam Dumps

Lead indicatorsare proactive metrics that provide early signals of performance, enabling timely action before outcomes are realized. In this case, insufficient investment led to missed targets---a lead indicator could help forecast spending trends or progress toward milestones before year-end.

Lag indicators (e.g., annual performance) show outcomes after the fact. KRIs and stage gates are valuable but are not direct predictors of performance outcomes related to investment levels.

CGEIT Review Manual: Domain 3 -- Benefits Realization: 'Lead indicators are essential for performance forecasting and timely intervention.'

COBIT 2019: BAI09 (Manage Performance and Capacity).

The greatest consideration when evaluating whether to comply with new carbon footprint regulations impacted by blockchain technology is the enterprise's risk appetite. This involves understanding the level of risk the organization is willing to accept in relation to the potential environmental impact and regulatory compliance requirements associated with blockchain technology. The organization's risk appetite guides decision-making processes, influencing whether to invest in more sustainable practices or technologies, or to accept the risks associated with non-compliance. While the organizational structure, IT process capability maturity, and the IT strategic plan are relevant, the risk appetite is the key factor in determining the approach to compliance with environmental regulations.

The board's concern about the total cost of IT requires a clear explanation of how IT spending is structured. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition notes that providing a breakdown of operational versus capital expenditures is critical to helping stakeholders understand IT costs and their alignment with business value.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 5: Benefits Realization):'When addressing concerns about IT costs, the CIO should provide a clear breakdown of operational expenditures (e.g., maintenance, salaries) versus capital expenditures (e.g., new systems, infrastructure). This transparency helps the board understand cost drivers and their contribution to business value.' (Approximate reference: Domain 5, Section on Cost Management)

A breakdown of operational versus capital expenditures (option D) directly addresses the board's concern by showing how IT funds are allocated, distinguishing between ongoing costs and investments in new capabilities.

Why not the other options?

A . A summary of benefits that will be achieved once key IT initiatives are completed: While benefits are important, they do not directly address the total cost concern, which requires cost transparency first.

B . A mapping of IT employee roles to the balanced scorecard: This is a performance management tool, not directly relevant to explaining total IT costs.

C . A benchmark of IT employee salary costs against comparable organizations: Benchmarking salaries is a narrow focus and does not provide a comprehensive view of total IT costs.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 5: Benefits Realization, Section on IT Cost Management.

ISACA CGEIT Study Guide, Chapter on Cost Transparency.

Comprehensive and Detailed

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Governance of Enterprise IT domain, addresses data governance to ensure proper management and protection of data, including third-party data. Establishing data ownership with clear accountabilities ensures that specific individuals or roles are responsible for overseeing third-party data, preventing unauthorized use through defined policies and controls. For example, a data owner can enforce access restrictions and monitor usage. The manual likely references COBIT 2019's APO14-Managed Data, which emphasizes data ownership for governance.

Option A: Communicate consequences is reactive and less effective than proactive ownership.

Option B: Encrypt data in transit addresses security but not unauthorized internal use.

Option D: Retention periods manage data lifecycle but don't directly prevent misuse.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT's APO14 and the CGEIT domain's focus on data governance. Data ownership is a core ISACA principle for data protection.

:

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT (focus on data governance).

COBIT 2019, APO14-Managed Data.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of data ownership), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

The risk management policy for IT-enabled investments must reflect the enterprise's risk appetite, which defines the level of risk the organization is willing to accept. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition highlights that the risk appetite is the primary consideration in developing risk management policies, as it guides decision-making and resource allocation.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 3: Risk Optimization):'The enterprise's risk appetite is the primary consideration when developing a risk management policy. It defines the acceptable level of risk for IT-enabled investments and ensures that risk management practices align with the enterprise's strategic objectives and tolerance for uncertainty.' (Approximate reference: Domain 3, Section on Risk Management Policy)

The risk appetite of the enterprise (option A) provides the foundation for determining how much risk is acceptable, which investments to pursue, and how to prioritize risk mitigation efforts.

Why not the other options?

B . Possible investment failures: While investment failures are a concern, they are a specific risk scenario, not the primary consideration for the policy, which should focus on the broader risk appetite.

C . Risk management framework: The framework is a tool to implement the policy, not the primary consideration for its development.

D . Value obtained with minimum risk: While value optimization is a goal, the policy must first be grounded in the enterprise's risk appetite to balance risk and reward.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 3: Risk Optimization, Section on Risk Appetite and Policy Development.

ISACA CGEIT Study Guide, Chapter on Risk Management Policies.