IAPP CIPP-US Exam Dumps

Get All Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States Exam Questions with Validated Answers

CIPP-US Pack
Vendor: IAPP
Exam Code: CIPP-US
Exam Name: Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States
Exam Questions: 195
Last Updated: October 7, 2025
Related Certifications: Certified Information Privacy Professional
Exam Tags: Professional US Information Privacy Officers
Gurantee
  • 24/7 customer support
  • Unlimited Downloads
  • 90 Days Free Updates
  • 10,000+ Satisfied Customers
  • 100% Refund Policy
  • Instantly Available for Download after Purchase

Get Full Access to IAPP CIPP-US questions & answers in the format that suits you best

PDF Version

$60.00
$36.00
  • 195 Actual Exam Questions
  • Compatible with all Devices
  • Printable Format
  • No Download Limits
  • 90 Days Free Updates

Discount Offer (Bundle pack)

$80.00
$48.00
  • Discount Offer
  • 195 Actual Exam Questions
  • Both PDF & Online Practice Test
  • Free 90 Days Updates
  • No Download Limits
  • No Practice Limits
  • 24/7 Customer Support

Online Practice Test

$50.00
$30.00
  • 195 Actual Exam Questions
  • Actual Exam Environment
  • 90 Days Free Updates
  • Browser Based Software
  • Compatibility:
    supported Browsers

Pass Your IAPP CIPP-US Certification Exam Easily!

Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by IAPP certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!

DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our IAPP CIPP-US exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.

Train with our IAPP CIPP-US exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.

Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the IAPP CIPP-US exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
 

Why Choose DumpsProvider for Your IAPP CIPP-US Exam Prep?

  • Verified & Up-to-Date Materials: Our IAPP experts carefully craft every question to match the latest IAPP exam topics.
  • Free 90-Day Updates: Stay ahead with free updates for three months to keep your questions & answers up to date.
  • 24/7 Customer Support: Get instant help via live chat or email whenever you have questions about our IAPP CIPP-US exam dumps.

Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s IAPP CIPP-US exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!

Free IAPP CIPP-US Exam Actual Questions

Question No. 1

What consumer protection did the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) require?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: B

The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) is an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) that was enacted in 2003. FACTA aims to enhance consumer protection against identity theft and fraud by requiring various measures, such as free annual credit reports, fraud alerts, and identity theft prevention programs. One of the consumer protections that FACTA requires is the truncation of account numbers on credit card receipts. This means that only the last four or five digits of the account number can be printed on the receipt, while the rest must be masked or deleted. This reduces the risk of unauthorized access or use of the account number by third parties who may obtain the receipt.Reference:

IAPP CIPP/US Body of Knowledge, Section III, B, 1

[IAPP CIPP/US Study Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.2]

[FACTA, Section 113]


Question No. 2

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

A US-based startup company is selling a new gaming application. One day, the CEO of the company receives an urgent letter from a prominent EU-based retail partner. Triggered by an unresolved complaint lodged by an EU resident, the letter describes an ongoing investigation by a supervisory authority into the retailer's data handling practices.

The complainant accuses the retailer of improperly disclosing her personal data, without consent, to parties in the United States. Further, the complainant accuses the EU-based retailer of failing to respond to her withdrawal of consent and request for erasure of her personal dat

a. Your organization, the US-based startup company, was never informed of this request for erasure by the EU-based retail partner. The supervisory authority investigating the complaint has threatened the suspension of data flows if the parties involved do not cooperate with the investigation. The letter closes with an urgent request: ''Please act immediately by identifying all personal data received from our company.''

This is an important partnership. Company executives know that its biggest fans come from Western Europe; and this retailer is primarily responsible for the startup's rapid market penetration.

As the Company's data privacy leader, you are sensitive to the criticality of the relationship with the retailer.

Upon review, the data privacy leader discovers that the Company's documented data inventory is obsolete. What is the data privacy leader's next best source of information to aid the investigation?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Question No. 3

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

Cheryl is the sole owner of Fitness Coach, Inc., a medium-sized company that helps individuals realize their physical fitness goals through classes, individual instruction, and access to an extensive indoor gym. She has owned the company for ten years and has always been concerned about protecting customer's privacy while maintaining the highest level of service. She is proud that she has built long-lasting customer relationships.

Although Cheryl and her staff have tried to make privacy protection a priority, the company has no formal privacy policy. So Cheryl hired Janice, a privacy professional, to help her develop one.

After an initial assessment, Janice created a first of a new policy. Cheryl read through the draft and was concerned about the many changes the policy would bring throughout the company. For example, the draft policy stipulates that a customer's personal information can only be held for one year after paying for a service such as a session with personal trainer. It also promises that customer information will not be shared with third parties without the written consent of the customer. The wording of these rules worry Cheryl since stored personal information often helps her company to serve her customers, even if there are long pauses between their visits. In addition, there are some third parties that provide crucial services, such as aerobics instructors who teach classes on a contract basis. Having access to customer files and understanding the fitness levels of their students helps instructors to organize their classes.

Janice understood Cheryl's concerns and was already formulating some ideas for revision. She tried to put Cheryl at ease by pointing out that customer data can still be kept, but that it should be classified according to levels of sensitivity. However, Cheryl was skeptical. It seemed that classifying data and treating each type differently would cause undue difficulties in the company's day-to-day operations. Cheryl wants one simple data storage and access system that any employee can access if needed.

Even though the privacy policy was only a draft, she was beginning to see that changes within her company were going to be necessary. She told Janice that she would be more comfortable with implementing the new policy gradually over a period of several months, one department at a time. She was also interested in a layered approach by creating documents listing applicable parts of the new policy for each department.

What is the most likely risk of Fitness Coach, Inc. adopting Janice's first draft of the privacy policy?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: A

Janice's first draft of the privacy policy may be too restrictive and impractical for Fitness Coach, Inc. to follow, given the nature of its business and the expectations of its customers. By limiting the retention of personal information to one year and requiring written consent for any third-party sharing, the policy may create operational challenges and customer dissatisfaction. For example, customers may want to resume their fitness programs after a long hiatus and expect the company to have their previous records and preferences. Similarly, third-party contractors may need access to customer information to provide better services and tailor their classes. If the company fails to adhere to its own privacy policy, it may face legal consequences, reputational damage, and loss of trust from its customers. Therefore, the company should adopt a more realistic and flexible privacy policy that balances its business needs and its customers' privacy rights.Reference:

Privacy Policy for Health Coaches

Privacy Policies for Online Coaches

Privacy Policy - Coaching.com


Question No. 4

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question;

Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign

Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only.

Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data

Under Section 702 of F1S

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: B

Under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the National Security Agency (NSA) is authorized to collect and analyze communications of non-U.S. persons located outside the United States for foreign intelligence purposes. Section 702 allows the NSA to compel U.S.-based service providers, such as AWS or Microsoft, to provide access to data without requiring a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) if certain criteria are met.

Key Aspects of Section 702:

Scope of Surveillance: Section 702 applies to non-U.S. persons located outside the United States. It cannot be used to target U.S. citizens or individuals located within the United States, even if they communicate with non-U.S. persons.

Provider Obligations: The NSA can compel U.S.-based service providers (e.g., AWS, Microsoft) to disclose information about communications involving foreign individuals if the data is relevant to foreign intelligence purposes.

Explanation of the Options:

A. Compel AWS to disclose Jane's email communications with a Taiwanese national residing in Taiwan: Incorrect. Jane is a U.S. citizen, and Section 702 cannot be used to directly target U.S. persons or their communications, even if the other party in the communication is a non-U.S. person.

B. Compel AWS to disclose email communications between two Chinese nationals residing in the EU: Correct. Section 702 allows the NSA to target non-U.S. persons located outside the U.S. without a warrant, even if their communications are hosted by a U.S.-based service provider like AWS. This scenario falls directly under the scope of Section 702.

C. Compel Microsoft to disclose Patrick's Skype calls with a Brazilian national living in Peru: Incorrect. Patrick is a U.S. resident, even though he is a French citizen. Section 702 cannot be used to target individuals who are lawfully residing in the United States.

D. Compel Jane to disclose the PIN code for her corporate mobile phone: Incorrect. Section 702 applies to electronic communications data held by service providers, not to individuals. Compelling an individual to disclose a PIN code would require a different legal authority, such as a court-issued subpoena or warrant.

Legal Framework:

Section 702 of FISA: Provides the NSA with the authority to compel U.S.-based service providers to assist in collecting data on non-U.S. persons located outside the U.S. for foreign intelligence purposes.

Targeting Limitations: Section 702 cannot be used to intentionally target U.S. persons or anyone located within the United States.

Service Providers: Examples include U.S.-based companies such as Amazon AWS, Microsoft, and Google.

Practical Considerations for Jones Labs:

Jones Labs should be aware that:

Data stored with U.S.-based providers (even if located in the EU) may still be subject to Section 702 requests.

International data transfer compliance may require careful consideration of Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) or other safeguards to align with EU privacy regulations, such as the GDPR, in light of the extraterritorial nature of U.S. surveillance laws.

Reference from CIPP/US Materials:

FISA Section 702 (50 U.S.C. 1881a): Outlines the legal authority for targeting non-U.S. persons located outside the United States.

IAPP CIPP/US Certification Textbook: Discusses Section 702 and its implications for U.S.-based service providers handling international data.

Schrems II Decision: Highlights conflicts between U.S. surveillance laws and EU privacy laws, particularly for data stored by U.S. companies overseas.


Question No. 5

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

Larry has become increasingly dissatisfied with his telemarketing position at SunriseLynx, and particularly with his supervisor, Evan. Just last week, he overheard Evan mocking the state's Do Not Call list, as well as the people on it. ''If they were really serious about not being bothered,'' Evan said, ''They'd be on the national DNC list. That's the only one we're required to follow. At SunriseLynx, we call until they ask us not to.''

Bizarrely, Evan requires telemarketers to keep records of recipients who ask them to call ''another time.'' This, to Larry, is a clear indication that they don't want to be called at all. Evan doesn't see it that way.

Larry believes that Evan's arrogance also affects the way he treats employees. The U.S. Constitution protects American workers, and Larry believes that the rights of those at SunriseLynx are violated regularly. At first Evan seemed friendly, even connecting with employees on social medi

a. However, following Evan's political posts, it became clear to Larry that employees with similar affiliations were the only ones offered promotions.

Further, Larry occasionally has packages containing personal-use items mailed to work. Several times, these have come to him already opened, even though this name was clearly marked. Larry thinks the opening of personal mail is common at SunriseLynx, and that Fourth Amendment rights are being trampled under Evan's leadership.

Larry has also been dismayed to overhear discussions about his coworker, Sadie. Telemarketing calls are regularly recorded for quality assurance, and although Sadie is always professional during business, her personal conversations sometimes contain sexual comments. This too is something Larry has heard Evan laughing about. When he mentioned this to a coworker, his concern was met with a shrug. It was the coworker's belief that employees agreed to be monitored when they signed on. Although personal devices are left alone, phone calls, emails and browsing histories are all subject to surveillance. In fact, Larry knows of one case in which an employee was fired after an undercover investigation by an outside firm turned up evidence of misconduct. Although the employee may have stolen from the company, Evan could have simply contacted the authorities when he first suspected something amiss.

Larry wants to take action, but is uncertain how to proceed.

In what area does Larry have a misconception about private-sector employee rights?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: A

Larry has a misconception about the applicability of federal law to private-sector employee rights. He believes that the U.S. Constitution protects American workers from various forms of discrimination, harassment, and invasion of privacy by their employers. However, the U.S.Constitution only applies to government actions, not private actions, unless there is a specific federal statute that extends constitutional protections to the private sector1.For example, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin by private employers2.The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 regulates the interception and disclosure of electronic communications by private parties3.The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 sets the rules for commercial email and gives recipients the right to opt out of receiving unwanted messages4. These are examples of federal laws that apply to private-sector employees, but they do not cover all the situations that Larry faces at SunriseLynx. For instance, there is no federal law that protects private-sector employees from political discrimination or from having their personal mail opened by their employers.Larry may have to rely on state laws or common law torts to seek redress for these violations of his rights.Reference:1:Private Sector vs. Public Sector Employee Rights2: [Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia]3: [Electronic Communications Privacy Act - Wikipedia]4:CAN-SPAM Act: A Compliance Guide for Business: IAPP CIPP/US Certified Information Privacy Professional Study Guide, Chapter 5: Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Privacy, p. 141-142


100%

Security & Privacy

10000+

Satisfied Customers

24/7

Committed Service

100%

Money Back Guranteed