- 106 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Google Cloud Associate Data Practitioner Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | Associate-Data-Practitioner |
| Exam Name: | Google Cloud Associate Data Practitioner |
| Exam Questions: | 106 |
| Last Updated: | February 5, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Google Cloud Certified, Data Practitioner |
| Exam Tags: | Associate Level Google Data AnalystsGoogle Data Engineers |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Google Cloud Associate Data Practitioner exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Google certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Google Associate-Data-Practitioner exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Google Associate-Data-Practitioner exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Google Associate-Data-Practitioner exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Google Associate-Data-Practitioner exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
You have an existing weekly Storage Transfer Service transfer job from Amazon S3 to a Nearline Cloud Storage bucket in Google Cloud. Each week, the job moves a large number of relatively small files. As the number of files to be transferred each week has grown over time, you are at risk of no longer completing the transfer in the allocated time frame. You need to decrease the total transfer time by replacing the process. Your solution should minimize costs where possible. What should you do?
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth
Why B is correct:Creating parallel transfer jobs by using include and exclude prefixes allows you to split the data into smaller chunks and transfer them in parallel.
This can significantly increase throughput and reduce the overall transfer time.
Why other options are incorrect:A: Changing the storage class to Standard will not improve transfer speed.
C: Dataflow is a complex solution for a simple file transfer task.
D: Agent-based transfer is suitable for large files or network limitations, but not for a large number of small files.
You manage an ecommerce website that has a diverse range of products. You need to forecast future product demand accurately to ensure that your company has sufficient inventory to meet customer needs and avoid stockouts. Your company's historical sales data is stored in a BigQuery table. You need to create a scalable solution that takes into account the seasonality and historical data to predict product demand. What should you do?
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
Forecasting product demand with seasonality requires a time series model, and BigQuery ML offers a scalable, serverless solution. Let's analyze:
Option A: BigQuery ML's time series models (e.g., ARIMA_PLUS) are designed for forecasting with seasonality and trends. The ML.FORECAST function generates predictions based on historical data, storing them in a table. This is scalable (no infrastructure) and integrates natively with BigQuery, ideal for ecommerce demand prediction.
Option B: Colab Enterprise with a custom Python model (e.g., Prophet) is flexible but requires coding, maintenance, and potentially exporting data, reducing scalability compared to BigQuery ML's in-place processing.
Option C: Linear regression predicts continuous values but doesn't handle seasonality or time series patterns effectively, making it unsuitable for demand forecasting.
Option D: Logistic regression is for binary classification (e.g., yes/no), not time series forecasting of demand quantities. Why A is Best: ARIMA_PLUS in BigQuery ML automatically models seasonality and trends, requiring only SQL knowledge. It's serverless, scales with BigQuery's capacity, and keeps data in one place, minimizing complexity and cost. For example, CREATE MODEL ... OPTIONS(model_type='ARIMA_PLUS') followed by ML.FORECAST delivers accurate, scalable forecasts. Extract from Google Documentation: From 'BigQuery ML Time Series Forecasting' (https://cloud.google.com/bigquery-ml/docs/reference/standard-sql/bigqueryml-syntax-create-time-series): 'The ARIMA_PLUS model type in BigQuery ML is designed for time series forecasting, accounting for seasonality and trends, making it ideal for predicting future values like product demand based on historical data.' Reference: Google Cloud Documentation - 'BigQuery ML Time Series' (https://cloud.google.com/bigquery-ml/docs/time-series).
Why A is Best: ARIMA_PLUS in BigQuery ML automatically models seasonality and trends, requiring only SQL knowledge. It's serverless, scales with BigQuery's capacity, and keeps data in one place, minimizing complexity and cost. For example, CREATE MODEL ... OPTIONS(model_type='ARIMA_PLUS') followed by ML.FORECAST delivers accurate, scalable forecasts.
Extract from Google Documentation: From 'BigQuery ML Time Series Forecasting' (https://cloud.google.com/bigquery-ml/docs/reference/standard-sql/bigqueryml-syntax-create-time-series): 'The ARIMA_PLUS model type in BigQuery ML is designed for time series forecasting, accounting for seasonality and trends, making it ideal for predicting future values like product demand based on historical data.'
Option D: Logistic regression is for binary classification (e.g., yes/no), not time series forecasting of demand quantities. Why A is Best: ARIMA_PLUS in BigQuery ML automatically models seasonality and trends, requiring only SQL knowledge. It's serverless, scales with BigQuery's capacity, and keeps data in one place, minimizing complexity and cost. For example, CREATE MODEL ... OPTIONS(model_type='ARIMA_PLUS') followed by ML.FORECAST delivers accurate, scalable forecasts. Extract from Google Documentation: From 'BigQuery ML Time Series Forecasting' (https://cloud.google.com/bigquery-ml/docs/reference/standard-sql/bigqueryml-syntax-create-time-series): 'The ARIMA_PLUS model type in BigQuery ML is designed for time series forecasting, accounting for seasonality and trends, making it ideal for predicting future values like product demand based on historical data.' Reference: Google Cloud Documentation - 'BigQuery ML Time Series' (https://cloud.google.com/bigquery-ml/docs/time-series).
Your organization consists of two hundred employees on five different teams. The leadership team is concerned that any employee can move or delete all Looker dashboards saved in the Shared folder. You need to create an easy-to-manage solution that allows the five different teams in your organization to view content in the Shared folder, but only be able to move or delete their team-specific dashboard. What should you do?
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth
Why C is correct:Setting the Shared folder to 'View' ensures everyone can see the content.
Creating Looker groups simplifies access management.
Subfolders allow granular permissions for each team.
Granting 'Manage Access, Edit' allows teams to modify only their own content.
Why other options are incorrect:A: Grants View access only, so teams can't edit.
B: Moving content to personal folders defeats the purpose of sharing.
D: Grants edit access to all members of the team, not the team as a whole, which is not ideal.
Looker Access Control: https://cloud.google.com/looker/docs/access-control
Looker Groups: https://cloud.google.com/looker/docs/groups
You manage a web application that stores data in a Cloud SQL database. You need to improve the read performance of the application by offloading read traffic from the primary database instance. You want to implement a solution that minimizes effort and cost. What should you do?
Enabling automatic backups and creating a read replica of the Cloud SQL instance is the best solution to improve read performance. Read replicas allow you to offload read traffic from the primary database instance, reducing its load and improving overall performance. This approach is cost-effective and easy to implement within Cloud SQL. It ensures that the primary instance focuses on write operations while replicas handle read queries, providing a seamless performance boost with minimal effort.
You are designing a BigQuery data warehouse with a team of experienced SQL developers. You need to recommend a cost-effective, fully-managed, serverless solution to build ELT processes with SQL pipelines. Your solution must include source code control, environment parameterization, and data quality checks. What should you do?
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
The solution must support SQL-based ELT, be serverless and cost-effective, and include advanced features like version control and quality checks. Let's dive in:
Option A: Cloud Data Fusion is a visual ETL tool, not SQL-centric (uses plugins), and isn't fully serverless (requires instance management). It lacks native source code control and parameterization.
Option B: Dataform is a serverless, SQL-based ELT platform for BigQuery. It uses SQLX scripts, integrates with Git for version control, supports environment variables (parameterization), and offers assertions for data quality---all meeting the requirements cost-effectively.
Option C: Dataproc is for Spark/MapReduce, not SQL ELT, and requires cluster management, contradicting serverless and cost goals.
Option D: Cloud Composer orchestrates workflows (Python DAGs), not SQL pipelines natively. It's managed but not optimized for ELT within BigQuery alone. Why B is Best: Dataform leverages your team's SQL skills, runs in BigQuery (no extra infrastructure), and provides Git integration (e.g., GitHub), parameterization (e.g., DECLARE env STRING DEFAULT 'prod';), and quality checks (e.g., assert 'no_nulls' AS SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE col IS NULL). It's the perfect fit. Extract from Google Documentation: From 'Dataform Overview' (https://cloud.google.com/dataform/docs): 'Dataform is a fully managed, serverless solution for building SQL-based ELT pipelines in BigQuery, with built-in Git version control, environment parameterization, and data quality assertions for robust data warehouse management.' Reference: Google Cloud Documentation - 'Dataform' (https://cloud.google.com/dataform).
Why B is Best: Dataform leverages your team's SQL skills, runs in BigQuery (no extra infrastructure), and provides Git integration (e.g., GitHub), parameterization (e.g., DECLARE env STRING DEFAULT 'prod';), and quality checks (e.g., assert 'no_nulls' AS SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE col IS NULL). It's the perfect fit.
Extract from Google Documentation: From 'Dataform Overview' (https://cloud.google.com/dataform/docs): 'Dataform is a fully managed, serverless solution for building SQL-based ELT pipelines in BigQuery, with built-in Git version control, environment parameterization, and data quality assertions for robust data warehouse management.'
Option D: Cloud Composer orchestrates workflows (Python DAGs), not SQL pipelines natively. It's managed but not optimized for ELT within BigQuery alone. Why B is Best: Dataform leverages your team's SQL skills, runs in BigQuery (no extra infrastructure), and provides Git integration (e.g., GitHub), parameterization (e.g., DECLARE env STRING DEFAULT 'prod';), and quality checks (e.g., assert 'no_nulls' AS SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE col IS NULL). It's the perfect fit. Extract from Google Documentation: From 'Dataform Overview' (https://cloud.google.com/dataform/docs): 'Dataform is a fully managed, serverless solution for building SQL-based ELT pipelines in BigQuery, with built-in Git version control, environment parameterization, and data quality assertions for robust data warehouse management.' Reference: Google Cloud Documentation - 'Dataform' (https://cloud.google.com/dataform).
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed