- 32 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All FCSS - Security Operations 7.4 Analyst Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Fortinet |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 |
| Exam Name: | FCSS - Security Operations 7.4 Analyst |
| Exam Questions: | 32 |
| Last Updated: | February 1, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Fortinet Certified Solution Specialist, |
| Exam Tags: | Advanced Level Fortinet Security Engineers and Security Operations Specialists |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Fortinet FCSS - Security Operations 7.4 Analyst exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Fortinet certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Fortinet FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Fortinet FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Fortinet FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Fortinet FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Refer to the exhibits.

The DOS attack playbook is configured to create an incident when an event handler generates a denial-of-ser/ice (DoS) attack event.
Why did the DOS attack playbook fail to execute?
Understanding the Playbook and its Components:
The exhibit shows the status of a playbook named 'DOS attack' and its associated tasks.
The playbook is designed to execute a series of tasks upon detecting a DoS attack event.
Analysis of Playbook Tasks:
Attach_Data_To_Incident: Task ID placeholder_8fab0102, status is 'upstream_failed,' meaning it did not execute properly due to a previous task's failure.
Get Events: Task ID placeholder_fa2a573c, status is 'success.'
Create SMTP Enumeration incident: Task ID placeholder_3db75c0a, status is 'failed.'
Reviewing Raw Logs:
The error log shows a ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '10.200.200.100'.
This error indicates that the task attempted to convert a string (the IP address '10.200.200.100') to an integer, which is not possible.
Identifying the Source of the Error:
The error occurs in the file 'incident_operator.py,' specifically in the execute method.
This suggests that the task 'Create SMTP Enumeration incident' is the one causing the issue because it failed to process the data type correctly.
Conclusion:
The failure of the playbook is due to the 'Create SMTP Enumeration incident' task receiving a string value (an IP address) when it expects an integer value. This mismatch in data types leads to the error.
Fortinet Documentation on Playbook and Task Configuration.
Python error handling documentation for understanding ValueError.
Refer to the exhibit.

Which two options describe how the Update Asset and Identity Database playbook is configured? (Choose two.)
Understanding the Playbook Configuration:
The playbook named 'Update Asset and Identity Database' is designed to update the FortiAnalyzer Asset and Identity database with endpoint and user information.
The exhibit shows the playbook with three main components: ON_SCHEDULE STARTER, GET_ENDPOINTS, and UPDATE_ASSET_AND_IDENTITY.
Analyzing the Components:
ON_SCHEDULE STARTER: This component indicates that the playbook is triggered on a schedule, not on-demand.
GET_ENDPOINTS: This action retrieves information about endpoints, suggesting it interacts with an endpoint management system.
UPDATE_ASSET_AND_IDENTITY: This action updates the FortiAnalyzer Asset and Identity database with the retrieved information.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: The actions shown in the playbook are standard local actions that can be executed by the FortiAnalyzer, indicating the use of a local connector.
Option B: There is no indication that the playbook uses a FortiMail connector, as the tasks involve endpoint and identity management, not email.
Option C: The playbook is using an 'ON_SCHEDULE' trigger, which contradicts the description of an on-demand trigger.
Option D: The action 'GET_ENDPOINTS' suggests integration with an endpoint management system, likely FortiClient EMS, which manages endpoints and retrieves information from them.
Conclusion:
The playbook is configured to use a local connector for its actions.
It interacts with FortiClient EMS to get endpoint information and update the FortiAnalyzer Asset and Identity database.
Fortinet Documentation on Playbook Actions and Connectors.
FortiAnalyzer and FortiClient EMS Integration Guides.
Which FortiAnalyzer connector can you use to run automation stitches9
Overview of Automation Stitches:
Automation stitches in FortiAnalyzer are predefined sets of automated actions triggered by specific events. These actions help in automating responses to security incidents, improving efficiency, and reducing the response time.
FortiAnalyzer Connectors:
FortiAnalyzer integrates with various Fortinet products and other third-party solutions through connectors. These connectors facilitate communication and data exchange, enabling centralized management and automation.
Available Connectors for Automation Stitches:
FortiCASB:
FortiCASB is a Cloud Access Security Broker that helps secure SaaS applications. However, it is not typically used for running automation stitches within FortiAnalyzer.
FortiMail:
FortiMail is an email security solution. While it can send logs and events to FortiAnalyzer, it is not primarily used for running automation stitches.
Local:
The local connector refers to FortiAnalyzer's ability to handle logs and events generated by itself. This is useful for internal processes but not specifically for integrating with other Fortinet devices for automation stitches.
FortiOS:
FortiOS is the operating system that runs on FortiGate firewalls. FortiAnalyzer can use the FortiOS connector to communicate with FortiGate devices and run automation stitches. This allows FortiAnalyzer to send commands to FortiGate, triggering predefined actions in response to specific events.
Detailed Process:
Step 1: Configure the FortiOS connector in FortiAnalyzer to establish communication with FortiGate devices.
Step 2: Define automation stitches within FortiAnalyzer that specify the actions to be taken when certain events occur.
Step 3: When a triggering event is detected, FortiAnalyzer uses the FortiOS connector to send the necessary commands to the FortiGate device.
Step 4: FortiGate executes the commands, performing the predefined actions such as blocking an IP address, updating firewall rules, or sending alerts.
Conclusion:
The FortiOS connector is specifically designed for integration with FortiGate devices, enabling FortiAnalyzer to execute automation stitches effectively.
Fortinet FortiOS Administration Guide: Details on configuring and using automation stitches.
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Administration Guide: Information on connectors and integration options.
By utilizing the FortiOS connector, FortiAnalyzer can run automation stitches to enhance the security posture and response capabilities within a network.
Which two types of variables can you use in playbook tasks? (Choose two.)
Understanding Playbook Variables:
Playbook tasks in Security Operations Center (SOC) playbooks use variables to pass and manipulate data between different steps in the automation process.
Variables help in dynamically handling data, making the playbook more flexible and adaptive to different scenarios.
Types of Variables:
Input Variables:
Input variables are used to provide data to a playbook task. These variables can be set manually or derived from previous tasks.
They act as parameters that the task will use to perform its operations.
Output Variables:
Output variables store the result of a playbook task. These variables can then be used as inputs for subsequent tasks.
They capture the outcome of the task's execution, allowing for the dynamic flow of information through the playbook.
Other Options:
Create: Not typically referred to as a type of variable in playbook tasks. It might refer to an action but not a variable type.
Trigger: Refers to the initiation mechanism of the playbook or task (e.g., an event trigger), not a type of variable.
Conclusion:
The two types of variables used in playbook tasks are input and output.
Fortinet Documentation on Playbook Configuration and Variable Usage.
General SOC Automation and Orchestration Practices.
Exhibit:

Which observation about this FortiAnalyzer Fabric deployment architecture is true?
Understanding FortiAnalyzer Fabric Deployment:
FortiAnalyzer Fabric deployment involves a hierarchical structure where the Fabric root (supervisor) coordinates with multiple Fabric members (collectors and analyzers).
This setup ensures centralized log collection, analysis, and incident response across geographically distributed locations.
Analyzing the Exhibit:
FAZ1-Supervisor is located at AMER HQ and acts as the Fabric root.
FAZ2-Analyzer is a Fabric member located in EMEA.
FAZ3-Collector and FAZ4-Collector are Fabric members located in EMEA and APAC, respectively.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: The statement indicates that the AMER HQ SOC team cannot run automation playbooks from the Fabric supervisor. This is true because automation playbooks and certain orchestration tasks typically require local execution capabilities which may not be fully supported on the supervisor node.
Option B: High availability (HA) configuration for the supervisor node is a best practice for redundancy but is not directly inferred from the given architecture.
Option C: The EMEA SOC team having access to historical logs only is not correct since FAZ2-Analyzer provides full analysis capabilities.
Option D: The APAC SOC team has access to FortiView and other reporting functions through FAZ4-Collector, but this is not explicitly detailed in the provided architecture.
Conclusion:
The most accurate observation about this FortiAnalyzer Fabric deployment architecture is that the AMER HQ SOC team cannot run automation playbooks from the Fabric supervisor.
Fortinet Documentation on FortiAnalyzer Fabric Deployment.
Best Practices for FortiAnalyzer and Automation Playbooks.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed