- 76 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | F5 Networks |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | F5CAB3 |
| Exam Name: | BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration |
| Exam Questions: | 76 |
| Last Updated: | February 22, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | F5 Certified Administrator, BIG-IP Certification |
| Exam Tags: |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the F5 Networks BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by F5 Networks certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our F5 Networks F5CAB3 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our F5 Networks F5CAB3 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the F5 Networks F5CAB3 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s F5 Networks F5CAB3 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Refer to the exhibit.


A BIG-IP Administrator configures a new VLAN on an HA pair of devices that does NOT yet have any traffic. This action causes the assigned traffic group to fail over to the standby device. Which VLAN setting should be changed to prevent this issue?
The exhibit shows the advanced configuration of a VLAN where the Fail-safe option is checked. VLAN Fail-safe is a high-availability feature used to monitor network connectivity on a specific VLAN. When enabled, the BIG-IP system monitors the VLAN for network traffic. If the system does not detect any 'useful' traffic on the VLAN within the specified Fail-safe Timeout (which is 90 seconds in the exhibit), it attempts to generate traffic by pinging the default gateway or other devices. If it still detects no traffic, the BIG-IP concludes that the VLAN is unreachable or the network interface has failed, and it triggers a 'Fail-safe Action'---in this case, 'Reboot' or a failover to the peer device in the HA group.
Because the administrator has just created a new VLAN that 'does NOT yet have any traffic,' the Fail-safe mechanism triggers immediately after the 90-second timeout period. Since no devices are yet communicating on this VLAN, the BIG-IP incorrectly assumes there is a hardware or cabling failure and forces a failover to ensure the standby device (which might have better connectivity) takes over. To prevent this unwanted failover, the administrator should uncheck the Fail-safe box for that specific VLAN until the VLAN is fully populated with active nodes and regular traffic. Once the application is live and traffic is flowing, Fail-safe can be re-enabled to provide an additional layer of redundancy. Auto Last Hop (Option A) and Source Check (Option B) are routing and security features that do not trigger HA failover events.
A set of servers is used for an FTP application as well as an HTTP website via separate BIG-IP Pools. The server support team reports that some servers are receiving a lot more traffic than others. Which Load Balancing Method should the BIG-IP Administrator apply to even out the connection count?
Similar to the logic required for managing multi-service backend environments, the issue described---where servers hosting multiple protocols like FTP and HTTP are experiencing uneven distribution---stems from the BIG-IP's default behavior of treating each pool independently. If the administrator uses a member-based load balancing method, the BIG-IP distributes HTTP traffic regardless of how much FTP traffic that same physical server is currently processing.
To resolve this, the administrator must utilize the Least Connections (Node) method. By switching both the HTTP and FTP pools to this algorithm, the BIG-IP begins to make load balancing decisions based on the total combined connection count for the IP address of each server. When a new HTTP request arrives, the BIG-IP checks which server has the fewest total connections (including existing FTP sessions). This prevents a server that is already busy with long-lived FTP transfers from being overwhelmed by a sudden burst of HTTP requests.
Ratio methods (Options A and C) are static and rely on the administrator manually assigning weights to servers based on their perceived capacity; they do not adapt to real-time fluctuations in traffic volume across different pools. Least Connections (Member) (Option B) remains blind to the 'cross-pool' traffic on the same hardware. Only the Node-based Least Connections approach provides the global visibility necessary to 'even out' the total resource utilization across servers supporting multiple distinct applications.
For a given Virtual Server, the BIG-IP must perform SSL Offload and negotiate secure communication over TLSv1.2 only. What should the BIG-IP Administrator do to meet this requirement?
To fulfill the requirement of 'SSL Offload' limited to 'TLSv1.2 only,' the administrator must focus on the client-side of the connection. SSL Offload means the BIG-IP terminates the encrypted connection from the user, processes the traffic (often as plain text internally), and optionally sends it to the backend. The profile responsible for this termination and the initial negotiation with the client's browser is the Client SSL Profile.
A custom Client SSL Profile must be created because the default clientssl profile typically allows a broad range of protocols for compatibility (including TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2). To restrict communication specifically to TLS 1.2, the administrator modifies the Ciphers string within the profile. Using a string such as DEFAULT:!SSLv3:!TLSv1:!TLSv1.1 or specifically defining TLSv1.2-only suites ensures that the BIG-IP will reject any handshake attempts from older, less secure protocols.
Server SSL Profiles (Options B and C) are used for the encryption between the BIG-IP and the backend nodes, which is not what is requested here. Simply selecting 'no TLSv1' in an options list (Option D) is insufficient and often refers to older versions of the software; the modern and standard way to control protocol negotiation on a BIG-IP is through the precise application of Cipher Strings within the Client SSL profile. This ensures compliance with security standards like PCI-DSS while providing the offloading benefits to the backend infrastructure.
During a high-demand event, the BIG-IP Administrator needs to limit the number of new connections per second to a Virtual Server.
What should be applied?
Connection rate limits restrict how many new connections are accepted per second, protecting application resources.
A Standard Virtual Server reports poor performance for Internet users.
What TCP profile configuration should be applied?
WAN-optimized TCP profiles improve performance for high-latency Internet clients, while LAN profiles are optimal for backend servers.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed