Esri EGMP2201 Exam Dumps

Understanding the Scenario:

The organization needs to make 10 million features accessible in ArcGIS Online.

The dataset must remain synchronized with the enterprise geodatabase to ensure it is up to date.

Replication Options Overview:

Distributed Collaboration: Distributed collaboration enables sharing data across ArcGIS Enterprise and ArcGIS Online. However, it is not ideal for managing large datasets with frequent updates like this scenario.

Geodatabase Replication:

Designed for synchronizing data between enterprise geodatabases.

Supports one-way, two-way, or checkout replication to ensure updates are consistently transferred.

The best option for synchronizing a large dataset like this with ArcGIS Online via publishing workflows.

Delete and Append: This approach would involve overwriting the dataset frequently, which is inefficient and unsuitable for a dataset with 10 million features requiring frequent updates.

Steps to Implement Geodatabase Replication:

Use one-way geodatabase replication to replicate the dataset from the enterprise geodatabase to a secondary geodatabase.

Publish the replicated data to ArcGIS Online.

Set up periodic synchronization to ensure the ArcGIS Online data reflects updates from the enterprise geodatabase.

Reference:

Esri Documentation: Geodatabase Replication.

Best Practices for Large Datasets in ArcGIS Online: Sharing Large Datasets.

Why the Correct Answer is B: Geodatabase replication is explicitly designed for synchronizing large datasets between geodatabases, ensuring data consistency and compatibility with ArcGIS Online.

Scenario Overview:

The analyst creates a join between a large dataset and a nonspatial table to calculate an attribute field.

An error occurs, indicating that the join field is not indexed.

Cause of the Problem:

Joins between datasets rely on indexed fields to optimize the join operation. Without an index, the system must perform a full table scan, which can lead to errors or slow performance when working with large datasets.

Solution:

Running the Add Attribute Index tool creates an index on the join field, enabling efficient joining operations. (ArcGIS Documentation: Attribute Indexes)

Steps to Resolve:

Open the Add Attribute Index tool in ArcGIS Pro.

Select the nonspatial table as the input dataset.

Choose the field used in the join operation as the field to index.

Run the tool to create the attribute index.

Alternative Options:

Option A: Add Spatial Index is irrelevant for nonspatial data.

Option C: Rebuild Indexes reorganizes existing indexes but cannot create new ones, which is required here.

Thus, the analyst should run the Add Attribute Index tool to resolve the error.

Understanding the Scenario:

Records are being appended to a child version of a feature class registered as versioned.

Reconcile and post are taking longer than expected, suggesting complications during version synchronization.

Key Considerations for Reconciliation Performance:

Conflicting Edits (Option A): Reconciliation time increases if there are many conflicts to resolve. However, the question does not mention concurrent edits in Default or other child versions, making conflicts less likely to be the main issue.

Updates in Default (Option B): If Default has been updated since the child version was created, the reconcile process must account for changes in Default. This can significantly increase processing time as it integrates the child version changes with the modifications in Default.

Compress Operation (Option C): The Compress operation removes redundant states in the geodatabase but does not directly affect reconciliation speed. The question does not indicate that the child version is excluded from compression or that compression is related to the delay.

Steps to Improve Reconciliation Performance:

Minimize edits to Default during the child version's workflow.

Reconcile frequently to avoid large differences between Default and the child version.

Ensure that Compress operations are run regularly to optimize geodatabase state management.

Reference:

Esri Documentation: Reconcile and Post.

Why the Correct Answer is B: The delay occurs because Default was updated after the child version was created. The reconciliation process must merge changes from Default with those in the child version, increasing processing time. Conflicts (A) are not mentioned, and compress operations (C) do not directly cause reconciliation delays.

When users cannot edit a traditionally versioned feature dataset after a new feature class is added, the feature dataset must be re-registered as versioned.

1. Why Re-Register as Versioned?

Adding a feature class to a versioned feature dataset requires re-registering the entire feature dataset for versioning.

This step ensures that the new feature class is included in the versioning system and can participate in versioned workflows.

2. Why Other Steps Didn't Resolve the Issue?

Checked Permissions: Correct permissions do not address the need to re-register after adding a feature class.

Checked Connection File: Ensuring the connection file uses traditional versioning does not resolve missing registration.

Rebuilt Indexes and Statistics: While this improves performance, it does not affect versioning.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Connect as Data Owner and Edit Data:

Even as the data owner, edits would not be possible until the feature dataset is re-registered.

Unregister the Feature Dataset as Versioned:

Unregistering would delete the versioning information, potentially causing data loss in the delta tables.

Steps to Re-Register the Feature Dataset as Versioned:

Open ArcGIS Pro and connect as the data owner.

Right-click the feature dataset and select Manage > Register As Versioned.

Choose the option to Preserve edits to base tables (if required).

Save and test edits on the feature dataset.

Reference from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Registering Data as Versioned

Managing Versioned Feature Datasets

Conclusion:

The administrator should re-register the feature dataset as versioned to include the newly added feature class and resolve editing issues in the traditionally versioned environment.

Understanding the Scenario:

Edits made to a feature class need to be immediately visible to all users.

This indicates a requirement for direct edits to the base tables without any versioning overhead.

Editing Configuration Overview:

Traditional Versioned Editing: Edits are made to delta tables and require version reconciliation and posting to be visible to other users. This introduces a delay and does not meet the requirement for immediate visibility.

Nonversioned Editing: Edits are applied directly to the base table of the feature class, ensuring they are immediately visible to all users. This is the correct choice for the scenario.

Branch Versioned Editing: Edits are made in a branch version and are not immediately visible to other users unless the edits are saved to the default branch. This is not the best choice for immediate visibility.

Steps to Configure Nonversioned Editing:

Ensure the feature class is set to nonversioned editing mode in the enterprise geodatabase.

Grant necessary permissions for all users to edit the base table.

All edits made to the dataset will instantly reflect for all users.

Reference:

Esri Documentation: Nonversioned Editing.

Why the Correct Answer is B: Nonversioned editing is the only configuration that ensures immediate visibility of edits to all users. Traditional and branch versioning involve workflows that delay edit visibility.