Eccouncil 312-82 Exam Dumps

A Type II DApp is a decentralized application that uses both the blockchain and protocol of a Type I DApp. Type I DApps are the foundational blockchain-based platforms, such as Ethereum, that operate with their own blockchain. Type II DApps build on these platforms, using the existing blockchain and protocol, but offering specific functionalities or services.

Key Details:

Type I DApps: These are fundamental blockchain platforms, like Bitcoin or Ethereum, which have their own blockchain and provide a foundation for other applications.

Characteristics of Type II DApps: Type II DApps leverage the infrastructure of Type I DApps but add additional functionality through smart contracts or protocols. For example, protocols such as ERC-20 tokens or ERC-721 NFTs are built on Ethereum and utilize Ethereum's underlying blockchain and consensus protocol.

Integration: By utilizing both the blockchain and protocol of a Type I DApp, Type II DApps inherit the security, decentralization, and features of the underlying Type I platform, which simplifies their development and ensures compatibility.

In summary, B. Using the blockchain and protocol of a type I accurately describes the categorization of Type II DApps.

Proof of Burn (PoB) is a consensus mechanism where users permanently destroy (or 'burn') a certain quantity of cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, to gain the right to mine or acquire an altcoin. This process proves commitment to the network and secures it by effectively sacrificing one asset to obtain another.

Key Details:

Burning Process: In PoB, participants send a certain amount of cryptocurrency to an unspendable address, effectively removing it from circulation. This act serves as proof that they have invested in the network by reducing the supply of the original cryptocurrency.

Purpose and Use Cases: PoB is used by networks that want to incentivize long-term commitment and reduce total supply. It is often seen in new blockchain projects that allow miners or users to trade value in established currencies like Bitcoin for the native token of the new network.

Security: By requiring participants to destroy value, PoB helps prevent spam attacks and promotes network stability.

Therefore, B. Proof of Burn is the correct answer, as it describes the method where users destroy a certain amount of cryptocurrency to receive or mine another asset.

Ethereum uses Ethash as its Proof of Work (PoW) algorithm, while Bitcoin uses SHA-256 for its PoW algorithm. Both are used to secure their respective networks, but they differ in terms of computational complexity and memory requirements.

Key Details:

Ethash (Ethereum): Ethash is a memory-hard hashing algorithm designed to be resistant to ASIC mining, favoring GPU miners instead. It requires substantial memory, which helps to ensure a higher degree of decentralization.

SHA-256 (Bitcoin): Bitcoin's SHA-256 is a highly secure hashing algorithm that supports ASIC mining. It is computationally intensive but less memory-demanding compared to Ethash.

Purpose in PoW: Both algorithms enable miners to validate transactions and secure the network by solving complex puzzles. Ethash's design helps Ethereum maintain a decentralized network, whereas SHA-256 allows Bitcoin to achieve high levels of security with specialized mining equipment.

Therefore, D. ETHASH SHA-256 is the correct answer, as these are the specific PoW algorithms used by Ethereum and Bitcoin, respectively.

A hard fork occurs when there is a fundamental change in a blockchain's protocol, resulting in the creation of a new chain that is incompatible with the previous one. After a hard fork, nodes must upgrade to the new version of the blockchain's software to continue participating in the network. A hard fork can be used to implement new features, fix security issues, or change core aspects of the blockchain.

Key Details:

Differences from Soft Forks: Unlike a soft fork, which is backward-compatible and allows nodes on the previous version to still participate, a hard fork splits the blockchain into two distinct paths, with the upgraded path requiring new software.

Examples: Notable hard forks include Bitcoin Cash from Bitcoin and Ethereum Classic from Ethereum. These forks occurred due to disagreements within the community on how to handle certain protocol changes, leading to the creation of separate blockchains.

Upgrade Requirements: Participants on the blockchain who wish to continue on the new chain after a hard fork must update their software. Those who do not upgrade remain on the original chain, which continues as a separate, incompatible blockchain.

Thus, the correct answer is Hard fork (A), as it directly refers to a blockchain split that requires client upgrades for participation.

The UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) model establishes a chain of ownership by using digital signatures. In this model, each transaction consists of inputs (from previous UTXOs) and outputs (new UTXOs), and ownership is transferred by the current owner signing the transaction. This digital signature is then verified by the recipient, ensuring a secure and traceable chain of ownership.

Key Details:

Functionality of UTXO: UTXO is a fundamental part of Bitcoin's transaction model. When a transaction occurs, it consumes previous outputs as inputs, generating new UTXOs. Each UTXO can only be spent once, and ownership is verified through cryptographic signatures.

Chain of Ownership: The UTXO model inherently creates a clear and verifiable chain of ownership, as each output is signed by the current owner and used as input for future transactions, maintaining a continuous and transparent record of asset transfers.

Security through Digital Signatures: UTXO-based transactions rely on digital signatures to authenticate and authorize asset transfers, ensuring that only the rightful owner can initiate a transaction.

Thus, D. UTXO is the correct answer, as it accurately describes the model where ownership is established through a chain of digital signatures.