- 305 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All EC-Council Certified Incident Handler v3 Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Eccouncil |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | 212-89 |
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified Incident Handler v3 |
| Exam Questions: | 305 |
| Last Updated: | March 15, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Certified Incident Handler |
| Exam Tags: | Intermediate Level Cybersecurity Professionals |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Eccouncil EC-Council Certified Incident Handler v3 exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Eccouncil certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Eccouncil 212-89 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Eccouncil 212-89 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Eccouncil 212-89 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Eccouncil 212-89 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Francis is an incident handler and security expert. He works at MorisonTech Solutions based in Sydney, Australia. He was assigned a task to detect phishing/spam mails for the client organization.
Which of the following tools can assist Francis to perform the required task?
Netcraft is a tool that provides internet security services, including the detection of phishing and spam emails. It offers a range of services that can help organizations identify fraudulent websites and phishing activities by analyzing web content and email messages for known phishing signatures and heuristics. This makes it a useful tool for incident handlers like Francis, who is tasked with detecting phishing and spam emails for client organizations. Other options listed, such as Nessus (a vulnerability scanner), BTCrack (a Bluetooth pin and link-key cracker), and Cain and Abel (a password recovery tool), do not specialize in detecting phishing or spam emails but serve different purposes in cybersecurity.
An organization named Sam Morison Inc. decided to use cloud-based services to reduce
the cost of maintenance. The organization identified various risks and threats
associated with cloud service adoption and migrating business-critical data to thirdparty systems. Hence, the organization decided to deploy cloud-based security tools to
prevent upcoming threats.
Which of the following tools help the organization to secure the cloud resources and
services?
Alert Logic is a cloud-based security tool that provides Security-as-a-Service solutions including threat management, vulnerability assessment, and improved security outcomes. It is designed specifically to secure cloud resources and services, making it an ideal choice for organizations like Sam Morison Inc. that are moving their operations to the cloud and are concerned about the security of their data. Tools like Nmap, Burp Suite, and Wireshark, while valuable in certain contexts, do not offer the same cloud-focused security capabilities as Alert Logic.
In which of the following phases of the incident handling and response (IH&R) process is the identified security incidents analyzed, validated, categorized, and prioritized?
Incident triage is the phase in the Incident Handling and Response (IH&R) process where identified security incidents are analyzed, validated, categorized, and prioritized. This step is crucial for determining the severity of incidents and deciding on the order in which they should be addressed. During triage, incident handlers assess the impact, urgency, and potential harm of an incident to prioritize their response efforts effectively. This ensures that resources are allocated efficiently, and the most critical incidents are handled first. Incident recording and assignment involve logging incidents and assigning them to handlers, containment focuses on limiting the extent of damage, and notification involves informing stakeholders about the incident.
A mid-sized tech company leveraging a cloud-based infrastructure noticed unauthorized interactions between cloud-hosted applications. Upon investigation, the security team discovered confusion over whether internal teams or the cloud provider were tasked with overseeing certain services, which caused delays in the incident response. Which action would best support managing this cloud security incident?
The EC-Council Incident Handler (ECIH) curriculum highlights the Shared Responsibility Model in cloud environments. Cloud providers are responsible for security of the cloud (infrastructure), while customers are responsible for security in the cloud (applications, data, access control).
Confusion over responsibility leads to delayed incident response, misconfigurations, and security gaps. ECIH emphasizes clearly defining roles between cloud providers and internal teams before incidents occur, including logging, monitoring, access management, and incident handling responsibilities.
Option A improves security posture but does not resolve responsibility confusion. Option B improperly shifts all responsibility to the provider, which contradicts the shared model. Option D relates to operational configuration, not governance clarity.
Therefore, understanding shared responsibilities for incident response in cloud environments is critical to effectively managing cloud security incidents.
SevTech detected malicious code injected into its client data protection module, with indicators of a nation-state actor. In this high-pressure scenario, what should be SevTech's primary course of action?
According to the ECIH Risk Assessment and Recovery module, neutralizing the vulnerability is the top priority during active exploitation, even in nation-state scenarios.
Option C is correct because immediately patching and deploying updates removes the attacker's access vector and prevents further compromise. ECIH discourages counter-hacking and premature disclosure without containment.
Options A and B may follow after stabilization. Option D is illegal and prohibited.
Therefore, rapid patching is the correct primary action.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed