- 356 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All EC-Council Certified Incident Handler Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Eccouncil |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | 212-89 |
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified Incident Handler |
| Exam Questions: | 356 |
| Last Updated: | October 7, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Certified Incident Handler |
| Exam Tags: | Intermediate Level Cybersecurity Professionals |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Eccouncil EC-Council Certified Incident Handler exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Eccouncil certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Eccouncil 212-89 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Eccouncil 212-89 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Eccouncil 212-89 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Eccouncil 212-89 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
Darwin is an attacker residing within the organization and is performing network
sniffing by running his system in promiscuous mode. He is capturing and viewing all
the network packets transmitted within the organization. Edwin is an incident handler
in the same organization.
In the above situation, which of the following Nmap commands Edwin must use to
detect Darwin's system that is running in promiscuous mode?
The GPG18 and Forensic readiness planning (SPF) principles outline various guidelines to enhance an organization's readiness for forensic investigation and response. Principle 5, which suggests that organizations should adopt a scenario-based Forensic Readiness Planning approach that learns from experience gained within the business, emphasizes the importance of being prepared for a wide range of potential incidents by leveraging lessons learned from past experiences. This approach helps in continuously improving forensic readiness and response capabilities by adapting to the evolving threat landscape and organizational changes.
Ella, a wireless network administrator, notices multiple authentication failures and reports of users being disconnected from a corporate Wi-Fi network. Upon investigation, she identifies an unauthorized access point broadcasting the same SSID as the legitimate network. What is the most likely issue Ella is facing?
This scenario describes an evil twin attack, a well-documented wireless network threat covered in the ECIH Network Security Incidents module. An evil twin attack occurs when an attacker sets up a rogue wireless access point that mimics the SSID of a legitimate network. Unsuspecting users connect to the stronger or more accessible signal, allowing attackers to intercept credentials, inject malware, or perform man-in-the-middle attacks.
Option A is correct because the presence of an unauthorized access point broadcasting the same SSID and causing authentication failures is a defining indicator of an evil twin attack. Users may unknowingly connect to the malicious access point, leading to repeated disconnections from the legitimate network.
Option B would not involve a rogue access point. Option C focuses on identity spoofing at the MAC layer but does not explain SSID duplication. Option D involves IP address assignment issues, not SSID impersonation.
ECIH emphasizes that identifying rogue wireless infrastructure quickly is critical to containment. Detecting evil twin attacks allows responders to isolate the rogue device, protect credentials, and restore secure wireless operations.
Which of the following is not a countermeasure to eradicate cloud security incidents?
Disabling security options such as two-factor authentication (2FA) and CAPTCHA is not a countermeasure to eradicate cloud security incidents. In fact, it is contrary to best security practices. 2FA adds an additional layer of security by requiring two forms of verification before granting access to an account or system. CAPTCHA helps prevent automated attacks by ensuring that the entity accessing the service is human. Both are important security measures that protect against unauthorized access and automated attacks, thereby enhancing cloud security.
In which of the following types of fuzz testing strategies the new data will be generated
from scratch and the amount of data to be generated are predefined based on the
testing model?
Generation-based fuzz testing is a strategy where new test data is generated from scratch based on a predefined model that specifies the structure, type, and format of the input data. This approach is systematic and relies on a deep understanding of the format and protocol of the input data to create test cases that are both valid and potentially revealing of vulnerabilities. This contrasts with mutation-based fuzz testing, where existing data samples are modified (mutated) to produce new test cases, and log-based and protocol-based fuzz testing, which use different approaches to test software robustness and security.
James has been appointed as an incident handling and response (IH&R) team lead and
he was assigned to build an IH&R plan along with his own team in the company.
Identify the IH&R process step James is currently working on.
In the context of incident handling and response (IH&R), the preparation phase is the initial step where teams and resources are organized to effectively respond to potential security incidents. This phase involves building the IH&R team, developing incident response plans and policies, setting up communication channels, and ensuring that the team has the necessary tools and authority to act. James, being assigned to build an IH&R plan and organize his team, is engaging in the preparation step of the incident response process. This foundational step is crucial for ensuring a coordinated and efficient response to incidents when they occur.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed