- 75 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All EC-Council Digital Forensics Essentials Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Eccouncil |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | 112-57 |
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Digital Forensics Essentials |
| Exam Questions: | 75 |
| Last Updated: | August 23, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | DFE Certification |
| Exam Tags: |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Eccouncil EC-Council Digital Forensics Essentials exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Eccouncil certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Eccouncil 112-57 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Eccouncil 112-57 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Eccouncil 112-57 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Eccouncil 112-57 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
An organization decided to strengthen the security of its network by studying and analyzing the behavior of attackers. For this purpose, Steven, a security analyst, was instructed to deploy a device to bait attackers. Steven selected a solution that appears to contain very useful information to lure attackers and find their locations and techniques.
Identify the type of device deployed by Steven in the above scenario.
A honeypot is a deliberately deployed decoy system or service designed to attract attackers by appearing valuable or vulnerable, thereby enabling defenders to observe malicious behavior in a controlled manner. Digital forensics and incident response references describe honeypots as tools for threat intelligence and evidence collection, because they can record interaction details such as connection sources, exploited services, commands executed, malware dropped, and attempted privilege escalation. This directly matches the scenario: Steven deployed something that ''appears to contain very useful information'' to lure attackers and help identify their locations and techniques. Honeypots are typically instrumented with extensive logging and monitoring, making them especially useful for building timelines, extracting indicators of compromise, and understanding adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures.
The other options do not align with the ''bait attackers'' goal. An IDS primarily detects and alerts on suspicious activity but is not intended to impersonate a valuable target. A firewall enforces access control rules to block/allow traffic, not entice attackers. A router forwards packets and provides network connectivity; it is not a deception platform. Therefore, the device type described is a Honeypot (C).
Which of the following types of phishing attacks allows an attacker to exploit instant messaging platforms by employing IM as a tool to spread spam?
Spimming is defined in digital forensics and cybercrime references as spam over instant messaging (IM). It is a social-engineering variant where attackers use instant messaging platforms (and sometimes chat apps) to deliver unsolicited bulk messages containing malicious links, fraudulent offers, credential-harvesting lures, or malware downloads. Because IM messages are often delivered in real time and can appear to come from known contacts (via compromised accounts), spimming can achieve higher click-through rates than traditional email spam. For investigators, spimming incidents commonly leave artifacts such as chat logs, message timestamps, sender identifiers, embedded URLs, and sometimes downloaded payload traces on the endpoint. These artifacts help establish attacker infrastructure (domains, IPs), victim interaction (click events, file creation), and timeline correlation with network logs.
The other options do not match the ''IM as a tool to spread spam'' description. Whaling targets high-profile individuals via highly tailored phishing, typically email-based. Pharming redirects users to fraudulent websites (often via DNS or host-file manipulation) without relying on bulk IM spam. Spear phishing is targeted phishing toward specific individuals or groups, not necessarily IM spam. Therefore, the phishing/spam attack that exploits instant messaging platforms is Spimming (C).
Which of the following Windows system files is created in the system drive after OS installation to support the internal functions and system service dispatch stubs to executive functions?
Ntdll.dll is the Windows user-mode system library that provides many internal NT functions (commonly exposed as ''NT Native API'' routines such as Nt*/Zw*) and, critically, contains the system service dispatch stubs used by user-mode code to transition into kernel mode for operating system services. In standard Windows architecture, most user-mode applications call higher-level APIs (for example, Win32 APIs in Kernel32.dll), which then ultimately rely on Ntdll.dll to perform the final step of invoking the kernel through these system call stubs. This is why Ntdll.dll is a core component loaded into nearly every process and is tightly associated with the boundary between user mode and the executive components of the OS.
From a forensics viewpoint, understanding Ntdll.dll matters because it is central to how processes request privileged services, and it is frequently referenced in analyses of process execution, API call chains, and certain user-mode hooking techniques used by malware or anti-forensics tools.
By contrast, Ntoskrnl.exe is the kernel image itself (core kernel/executive), Win32k.sys is a kernel-mode graphics/windowing subsystem component, and Kernel32.dll provides higher-level Win32 APIs rather than the primary system-call stub layer. Hence, Ntdll.dll (C) is the correct answer.
Which of the following tools helps a forensics investigator develop and test across multiple operating systems in a virtual machine for Mac and allows access to Microsoft Office for Windows?
A common requirement in macOS-focused forensic labs is the ability to run multiple operating systems on a single Mac for controlled testing, malware detonation in a sandbox, reproduction of user activity, and validation of artifacts across platforms. This is typically achieved through desktop virtualization, where a hypervisor hosts guest operating systems (such as Windows and various Linux distributions) inside virtual machines. Parallels Desktop 16 is a Mac virtualization solution built specifically to run Windows on macOS with strong integration features (such as shared clipboard, folder sharing, and ''coherence'' modes that allow Windows applications to appear alongside Mac applications). This capability aligns with the question's description: developing and testing across multiple OSs in VMs on a Mac and enabling use of Microsoft Office for Windows within that Windows guest environment.
The other tools do not fit. Riverbed Modeler and NetSim are primarily network modeling/simulation tools used for network design and training, not desktop virtualization. Camtasia is used for screen recording and video editing, which can support documentation but does not provide a VM environment. Therefore, the only option that directly provides cross-OS virtual machines on macOS and supports running Windows applications like Microsoft Office is Parallels Desktop 16 (B).
Benoy, a security professional at an organization, extracted Apache access log entries to view critical information about all the operations performed on a web server. The Apache access log extracted by Benoy is given below:
''10.10.10.10 - Jason [17/Aug/2019:00:12:34 +0300] "GET /images/content/bg_body_1.jpg HTTP/1.0" 500 1458''
Identify the HTTP status code in the Apache access log entry above that indicates the response was successful.
In the Apache Combined/Custom access log format, the value immediately after the quoted request (here, 'GET ... HTTP/1.0') is the HTTP status code returned by the server. In the provided entry, that field is 500. From a forensic analysis standpoint, recognizing field positions matters because investigators correlate client IPs, timestamps, requested resources, and server outcomes to reconstruct attack timelines and identify failed exploitation attempts or misconfigurations.
It is important to note that successful HTTP responses are typically in the 2xx range, most commonly 200 (OK), while 3xx indicates redirects, 4xx indicates client-side errors (such as 404 Not Found), and 5xx indicates server-side failures. Specifically, 500 represents an Internal Server Error, meaning the server encountered an unexpected condition and could not fulfill the request successfully.
The other options are not HTTP status codes in this entry: +0300 is the timezone offset in the timestamp, 1.0 is the HTTP protocol version, and 2019 is part of the date. Therefore, the only HTTP status code present---and the correct choice among the options---is 500 (B), even though it reflects an error rather than success.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed