Cyber AB CMMC-CCA Exam Dumps

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The CAP requires specific evidence from third parties for inherited practices (Option B). Options A, C, and D do not follow CAP evidence rules.

Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):

Section 2.2 -- Conduct Assessment (pg. 25):'Request detailed evidence from third-party providers to verify inherited practice objectives.'

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanatio n:

AU.L2-3.3.1 requires 'creating and retaining audit records with sufficient content.' Examining procedures (A) verifies if defined content meets requirements, addressing the scenario's deficiency (limited logs). Testing procedures (B) isn't standard, testing configs (C) is secondary, and examining mechanisms (D) isn't a method---testing them is. The CMMC guide lists procedural examination as key.

Extract from Official CMMC Documentation:

CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2 (v2.0), AU.L2-3.3.1: 'Examine procedures addressing audit record generation.'

NIST SP 800-171A, 3.3.1: 'Examine documented processes for content sufficiency.'

Resources:

https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/CMMC/AG_Level2_MasterV2.0_FINAL_202112016_508.pdf

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

SC.L2-3.13.11 requires FIPS-validated cryptography for CUI confidentiality, per NIST SP 800-171. Examining validation certificates (Option D) directly confirms FIPS compliance, as mandated by NIST SP 800-171A's examine method, providing the most conclusive evidence. Option A(examining modules) is vague without certificates. Option B (interviews/documentation) supports but isn't definitive. Option C (observing use) doesn't verify FIPS validation. Option D is the correct answer.

Reference Extract:

NIST SP 800-171A, SC-3.13.11:''Examine FIPS validation certificates to confirm cryptography meets standards.''Resources:https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/171/a/final

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) allows for practices to be inherited from an External Service Provider (ESP) such as SecureLogic Inc., provided that the evidence demonstrates that the ESP adequately performs the inherited practices and that these practices apply to the Organization Seeking Certification's (OSC) in-scope assets. The Lead Assessor's role is not to automatically accept or reject evidence but to evaluate its adequacy and sufficiency against the CMMC assessment objectives. Option A (automatically scoring as 'MET') skips this critical evaluation, risking an inaccurate assessment. Option B (scoring as 'NOT MET' regardless of evidence) disregards valid evidence, which is inconsistent with CAP guidance. Option C (prohibiting inheritance) is incorrect, as the CAP explicitly permits inheritance from ESPs when properly evidenced. Option D aligns with the CAP's requirement to assess evidence for inherited practices thoroughly.

Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):

Section 1.6.1 -- Access and Verify Evidence (pg. 19):'Evidence from an enterprise or entity from which objectives are inherited must show that Assessment Objectives are met and applicable to the OSC's in-scope assets.'

Section 2.2 -- Conduct Assessment (pg. 25):'The Assessment Team shall determine ifpractices implemented by an External Service Provider (ESP) meet the intent of the CMMC Assessment Objectives.'

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Sections 1.6.1 and 2.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The CAP lists conditions for ineligibility (Options A, B, C), but minor updates to existing practices (Option D) are eligible for correction.

Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):

Section 2.3.2.1 -- Ineligible Practices (pg. 28):'Ineligible practices include those leading to exploitation, unimplemented prior to assessment, or on the Self-Assessment Tracker.'

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.3.2.1.