Cyber AB CMMC-CCA Exam Dumps

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The CAP states no automatic credit for other certifications like ISO 27001 unless DoD policy allows, making Option C correct. Option A (deferring) implies potential credit, which isn't supported. Option B (verifying) suggests possible credit without policy backing. Option D (granting) violates CAP.

Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):

Section 1.1 -- Purpose (pg. 7):'Alternative cybersecurity certifications do not automatically bestow any status or credit towards CMMC certification unless DoD publishes non-duplication policies.'

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 1.1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanatio n:

AC.L2-3.1.7 -- Privileged Functions requires 'preventing non-privileged users from executing privileged functions.' The developer's access to kernel memory suggests inherited or misconfiguredpermissions from the Admin_Roles group. Prohibiting inheritance (B) ensures Dev_Roles don't gain elevated privileges, enforcing least privilege. Internet removal (A), dual authorization (C), and time restrictions (D) don't directly address role-based privilege creep, per the CMMC guide's focus on RBAC configuration.

Extract from Official CMMC Documentation:

CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2 (v2.0), AC.L2-3.1.7: 'Prevent privilege inheritance in role-based access controls to limit non-privileged users.'

NIST SP 800-171A, 3.1.7: 'Examine RBAC settings to ensure no unintended privilege escalation.'

Resources:

https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/CMMC/AG_Level2_MasterV2.0_FINAL_202112016_508.pdf

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The CoPC requires avoiding even the appearance of a COI, making declining the discount (Option C) correct. Options A, B, and D risk compromising objectivity.

Extract from Official Document (CoPC):

Paragraph 2.2 -- Objectivity (pg. 5):'Decline offers that could create an appearance of a conflict of interest.'

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct, Paragraph 2.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

The CoPC requires disclosure of familial COIs to ensure objectivity, making Option C the most appropriate. Option A (recusing without explanation) lacks transparency. Option B (not disclosing) violates CoPC. Option D (following policies) is vague and secondary to disclosure.

Extract from Official Document (CoPC):

Paragraph 2.2 -- Objectivity (pg. 5):'Disclose potential conflicts of interest, such as familialrelationships, to the employer before assignment.'

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct, Paragraph 2.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth

AC.L2-3.1.13[a] requires the OSC to identify cryptographic mechanisms protecting remote access session confidentiality, per NIST SP 800-171A and CMMC Level 2 guidelines. The organization's Access Control Policy and Procedures outline the standards and requirements for cryptography (e.g., FIPS-validated modules), while system design documentation details the specific mechanisms implemented (e.g., TLS, VPN configurations). These documents directly address the identification of cryptographic controls, making them the primary specifications for this objective.

Option A and B (interviews) provide supplementary insights but lack the authoritative detail of written policies and designs. Option C (remote access authorizations) focuses on permissions, not cryptographic mechanisms. Option D is the correct answer, as it aligns with NIST SP 800-171A'semphasis on examining specifications for objective [a].

Reference Extract:

NIST SP 800-171A, AC-3.1.13[a]:''Examine access control policy; procedures addressing remote access... system design documentation to determine if cryptographic mechanisms are identified.''

CMMC AG Level 2, AC.L2-3.1.13:''Verify cryptographic mechanisms via policy and design specs.''Resources:https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/171/a/final;https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/CMMC/AG_Level2_MasterV2.0_FINAL_202112016_508.pdf