- 58 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All Designing Cisco Security Infrastructure Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Cisco |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | 300-745 |
| Exam Name: | Designing Cisco Security Infrastructure |
| Exam Questions: | 58 |
| Last Updated: | May 24, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Cisco Certified Network Professional, Cisco Certified Network Professional Security |
| Exam Tags: | Security |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Cisco Designing Cisco Security Infrastructure exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Cisco certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Cisco 300-745 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Cisco 300-745 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Cisco 300-745 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Cisco 300-745 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
A company hosted multiple applications in the Kubernetes environment, using the naming app01, app02, and so on. An app01 user could access app02 data because no security measures are implemented. The administrator decided to place each application within a separate namespace and ensure that the namespaces are completely isolated and cannot communicate with each other. Which solution must be used to accomplish the task?
In a Kubernetes environment, Namespaces provide a logical partition for resources but do not, by default, provide network isolation. To prevent 'app01' from communicating with 'app02,' a NetworkPolicy must be implemented. NetworkPolicies act as the Layer 3/4 distributed firewall for the cluster, allowing administrators to define explicit rules for ingress and egress traffic between pods and namespaces.
To achieve complete isolation, a common design pattern is to implement a 'deny-all' default policy for each namespace and then explicitly allow only necessary traffic. This aligns with the Cisco SAFE architectural principle of micro-segmentation. While RoleBinding (Option B) manages permissions for the Kubernetes API (who can create or delete pods), it does not control the actual network traffic between those pods. HTTPRoute (Option A) and Gateway (Option D) are components of the Kubernetes Gateway API used for managing external traffic routing and load balancing, rather than internal pod-to-pod isolation. By deploying NetworkPolicies, the administrator ensures that the 'blast radius' of a compromised application is contained within its own namespace, fulfilling a core objective of securing cloud-native application infrastructure.
========
Which generative AI impact is addressed by a human-in-the-loop design policy?
In the realm of Artificial Intelligence security, AI hallucinations occur when a generative model perceives patterns that are non-existent or logically incorrect, leading to the creation of content that is nonsensical, factually wrong, or potentially dangerous. To mitigate the risks associated with these inaccuracies, a human-in-the-loop (HITL) design policy is essential. This policy ensures that human judgment and contextual understanding are integrated into the AI's decision-making or output validation process.
According to the Cisco SDSI v1.0 objectives, while AI is exceptional at processing high volumes of data, it lacks the ethical and logical framework to consistently identify its own hallucinations. By implementing a HITL approach, subject matter experts can review AI-generated responses, code, or security alerts before they are acted upon. This human oversight allows for the identification of 'logical leaps' or false information that automated filters might miss.
While deep fakes (Option B) are typically addressed through cryptographic watermarking or origin tracking, and phishing (Option C) is mitigated via email security gateways and user training, hallucinations are an inherent flaw in the model's predictive nature that requires manual verification. Scale changes (Option D) refer to technical image manipulations and are not a primary concern for HITL policies. Incorporating human feedback---often through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)---allows the security infrastructure to refine the model's accuracy over time, ensuring that generative outputs remain reliable, safe, and aligned with organizational standards.
Employees in a healthcare organization could not access their devices when they returned to work after the weekend. The security team discovered that a threat actor had encrypted the devices. Which security solution would mitigate the risk in future?
In the scenario described, the healthcare organization fell victim to a ransomware attack, where devices were encrypted to extort the organization. To mitigate such risks in the future, Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is the essential architectural component. According to the Cisco SDSI Secure Infrastructure domain, protecting endpoints requires more than just traditional antivirus; it necessitates a solution that provides deep visibility into file behavior and process execution.
A robust EDR solution, such as Cisco Secure Endpoint, continuously monitors all activity on the device. When ransomware attempts to initiate its encryption process, the EDR can detect the malicious behavioral pattern in real-time. It can then take automated actions, such as isolating the infected host from the network and 'stopping' the encryption process before it spreads. Furthermore, Cisco's EDR provides retrospective security, allowing administrators to see how the malware arrived and which other devices it touched. While Option A (Password Policies) helps prevent credential theft and Option C (DLP) prevents data theft, they do not stop the technical process of disk encryption. Only EDR provides the necessary detection and automated response capabilities to handle modern file-less and polymorphic malware threats effectively. This aligns with the Cisco SAFE goal of securing the endpoint layer against advanced persistent threats (APTs) and ransomware variants.
========
A video game company identified a potential threat of a SYN flood attack, which could disrupt the online gaming services and impact user experience. The attack can overwhelm network resources by exploiting the TCP handshake process, leading to server unavailability and degraded performance. To safeguard the company's infrastructure and ensure uninterrupted service, it is essential to enhance the security measures in place. The company must implement a solution that manages and mitigates the risk of such network-based attacks. Which security product must be implemented to mitigate similar risks?
A SYN flood attack is a classic Denial-of-Service (DoS) technique that exploits the TCP three-way handshake. By sending a massive volume of SYN packets without completing the handshake, the attacker exhausts the target server's connection table. Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Firepower) is the architectural component designed to mitigate these network-layer threats.
Cisco Secure Firewall utilizes features such as TCP Intercept and SYN Cookies to defend against these attacks. When a SYN flood is detected, the firewall can act as a proxy for the handshake, only passing the completed connection to the backend server once the three-way handshake is verified. This prevents the server's resources from being overwhelmed by 'half-open' connections.
In contrast, Cisco Web Security Appliance (Option A) is focused on web-based (HTTP/HTTPS) threats and proxying, not low-level TCP flood mitigation. Cisco Umbrella (Option B) primarily provides DNS-layer security and Secure Internet Gateway (SIG) services, which are ineffective against a direct SYN flood targeting an on-premises or cloud-hosted gaming server. Cisco Secure Endpoint (Option C) protects individual hosts from malware but cannot protect the network infrastructure or the server's TCP stack from being saturated by high-volume flood traffic. Consequently, Cisco Secure Firewall is the essential product for managing and mitigating these infrastructure-level network attacks.
========
Considering recent cybersecurity threats, a company wants to improve the process for identifying, assessing, and managing risks with a comprehensive and holistic approach. Which framework must be used to meet these requirements?
For an organization seeking a 'comprehensive and holistic approach' to risk management, the NIST SP 800-37 (Risk Management Framework - RMF) is the industry-standard recommendation. The RMF provides a structured, seven-step process for managing security and privacy risk: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, and Monitor.
According to the Cisco SDSI objectives, the NIST RMF allows organizations to align their security controls with their business goals and risk tolerance. It moves security beyond a simple 'checklist' and into a continuous lifecycle of improvement. HIPAA (Option A) and GDPR (Option D) are regulatory mandates focused on specific data types (Health and Privacy, respectively) rather than a general framework for all organizational risks. MITRE CAPEC (Option B) is a dictionary of attack patterns used for technical threat modeling, not a holistic risk management process. By adopting NIST SP 800-37, a company ensures that its security infrastructure is designed and maintained based on a rigorous assessment of the current threat landscape and organizational requirements, fulfilling the core requirements of the 'Risk, Events, and Requirements' domain.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed