CIPS L5M1 Exam Dumps

An effective working group is one that is able to achieve its objectives while maintaining good relationships among its members. Groups that function well display certain characteristics that ensure high performance and motivation. Five key characteristics are discussed below.

The first characteristic is clear objectives and purpose. An effective group understands what it is working towards and has shared goals. For example, in procurement, a category management group with a clear objective to deliver savings and sustainability improvements will be more focused and aligned.

The second characteristic is good communication. Open, honest, and regular communication allows group members to share ideas, raise concerns, and coordinate their activities. In procurement, effective communication between buyers, finance, and operations ensures that sourcing projects meet business needs.

The third is defined roles and responsibilities. Members of an effective group know what is expected of them and how their work contributes to the group's success. This reduces conflict and duplication of effort. For example, one procurement professional may lead supplier negotiations while another manages contract compliance.

Fourthly, trust and mutual respect are essential. Members of effective groups value each other's contributions and support one another. This creates psychological safety, meaning individuals are more willing to share ideas and take risks. In procurement, this could involve trusting colleagues to manage parts of a tender process without interference.

Finally, an effective group demonstrates strong leadership and motivation. A good leader sets direction, supports members, and creates a balance between task and people needs. Leadership also ensures the group stays motivated, particularly during challenges.

The CIPS Code of Conduct sets out the ethical standards expected of procurement professionals. By adhering to this code, buyers are guided to remain impartial, transparent, and fair in all their decisions, ensuring that supplier selection and procurement practices are ethical and free from bias.

Firstly, the code requires professionals to act with integrity. This means avoiding conflicts of interest, declaring personal relationships with suppliers, and making decisions based on facts and evidence rather than personal preferences. For example, a buyer cannot award a contract to a supplier owned by a friend without declaring the relationship.

Secondly, the code emphasises transparency and fairness. Procurement professionals must ensure all suppliers are treated equally and given the same information during tendering processes. This prevents favouritism or hidden advantages for certain suppliers.

Thirdly, the code demands professional competence. This includes basing supplier decisions on objective evaluation criteria such as cost, quality, risk, and sustainability, rather than subjective or biased views. By applying standard evaluation models, professionals avoid unconscious bias.

Fourthly, the code promotes accountability. Procurement professionals are expected to keep proper records of decisions and provide audit trails. This reduces the opportunity for unethical practices such as bribery or corruption and ensures decisions can be justified.

Finally, the code supports sustainability and social responsibility. By considering environmental, ethical, and social factors in procurement, professionals act in the best interests of society and avoid discriminatory or exploitative practices.

Conclusion:

By following the CIPS Code of Conduct, procurement professionals remain unbiased by avoiding conflicts of interest, ensuring fairness, and using objective criteri

a. They also act ethically by maintaining transparency, accountability, and responsibility to wider society. This builds trust with stakeholders, improves supplier relationships, and protects the reputation of both the individual and their organisation.

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (10 points):

Motivation refers to the internal drive that influences people's behaviour and performance.

Intrinsic motivation comes from within the individual and is linked to personal satisfaction, enjoyment, achievement, or a sense of purpose. For example, a procurement professional may feel motivated by solving complex supplier challenges or contributing to sustainability goals.

Extrinsic motivation comes from external rewards such as pay, bonuses, promotions, or recognition. For instance, a buyer might be motivated by achieving cost savings to receive a financial bonus.

Both types of motivation are important in the workplace. Intrinsic motivation sustains long-term commitment, while extrinsic rewards provide short-term incentives. Effective managers balance both to maximise performance.

One theory of motivation (15 points):

A widely used theory is Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory. Herzberg identified two sets of factors that influence motivation:

Hygiene factors -- these do not motivate if present, but if absent, they cause dissatisfaction. Examples include salary, working conditions, policies, supervision, and job security. For example, if procurement staff lack proper tools or fair pay, they may feel dissatisfied, but simply improving pay will not necessarily make them highly motivated.

Motivators -- these are intrinsic to the job and lead to satisfaction and motivation. They include achievement, recognition, responsibility, personal growth, and meaningful work. For instance, giving a buyer responsibility to lead a supplier negotiation or recognising their success increases intrinsic motivation.

Herzberg's theory highlights that managers cannot rely on pay and policies alone. They must remove dissatisfaction by ensuring fair hygiene factors and then boost engagement by providing motivators. In procurement, this could mean ensuring fair contracts, proper systems, and clear processes (hygiene factors), while also giving staff opportunities for training, career progression, and recognition (motivators).

Conclusion:

Intrinsic motivation is about internal satisfaction, while extrinsic motivation relies on external rewards. Herzberg's theory shows that managers should address hygiene factors to avoid dissatisfaction but must focus on motivators to truly drive performance. For procurement and supply leaders, combining both ensures staff remain engaged, loyal, and productive.

The Taylorism school of thought, also known as Scientific Management, was developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the early 20th century. It aimed to improve efficiency and productivity by applying systematic, scientific methods to the management of work. Its key principles can be summarised as follows.

The first principle is the scientific study of work. Taylor rejected traditional ''rule of thumb'' methods, instead advocating time-and-motion studies to identify the most efficient way of completing tasks. This broke jobs into smaller, measurable steps.

Secondly, Taylor emphasised the division of labour and specialisation. Workers should focus on narrowly defined tasks, allowing them to become faster and more efficient, similar to parts in a machine.

Thirdly, he argued for scientific selection and training of workers. Instead of leaving workers to train themselves, managers should select the right person for the job and provide formal training in the ''one best way'' to complete tasks.

Fourthly, Taylor stressed managerial control and supervision. He believed management should plan, organise and set methods, while workers should focus on carrying them out. This created a strong separation between planning and execution.

Finally, Taylor promoted financial incentives as motivators. He assumed that workers are primarily motivated by pay, so piece-rate systems and performance-based rewards were used to encourage higher output.

Taylorism brought many benefits, such as increased productivity, efficiency, and predictability in mass production industries. However, it also attracted criticism for treating workers like machines, reducing autonomy, and ignoring social and psychological needs. From a modern procurement perspective, its ideas are still visible in standardised processes such as purchase-to-pay systems, KPIs, and efficiency-driven shared services. However, organisations today often balance these principles with more human-centred approaches to motivation and teamwork.

In conclusion, the key principles of Taylorism were scientific analysis of work, specialisation, scientific selection and training, strict managerial control, and financial incentives. While its focus on efficiency shaped early management thinking, modern leaders must also consider motivation, empowerment, and adaptability to achieve sustainable success.

Groups are an essential feature of organisational life. A group can be defined as two or more individuals who interact and work together to achieve a purpose. Groups may be formally created by management or may form informally through social interaction. There are several reasons why groups form in organisations.

The first reason is task and goal achievement. Formal groups are created to achieve organisational objectives that require collaboration. For example, in procurement, a cross-functional sourcing group may be formed to run a tender process involving operations, finance, and procurement staff. Individuals form these groups because working together helps them achieve outcomes that they could not accomplish alone.

The second reason is social and psychological needs. According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, people seek belonging and relationships. Informal groups often form to meet these needs, providing friendship, support, and a sense of identity. In Star Fish Ltd, for instance, employees working remotely may form a social group using Teams or WhatsApp to stay connected and reduce feelings of isolation.

The third reason is safety and security. Groups can give members confidence and protection when facing uncertainty or change. For example, during organisational restructuring, employees may form informal groups to share information and support each other, making them feel less vulnerable. In procurement, staff may collaborate in groups to manage supplier risks or market volatility.

The fourth reason is power and influence. Groups provide individuals with a stronger collective voice. Trade unions are a formal example, but informal groups can also lobby management or resist unpopular changes. In procurement, buyers might form a group to influence senior managers on issues such as introducing sustainable sourcing practices. By forming groups, individuals can increase their bargaining power and impact decisions.

In conclusion, groups form for task achievement, to satisfy social needs, to provide security, and to increase power and influence. Managers must understand these dynamics because groups can both support organisational objectives and create challenges if informal groups resist change. Effective leaders harness the benefits of group formation while addressing the risks to ensure both cohesion and productivity.