CIPS L4M3 Exam Dumps

A Retention of Title clause allows the seller to retain ownership of goods until full payment is received. If included in a contract, this clause would have enabled ACC to claim ownership of the number plates and potentially recover them from Elite Motors Ltd, even in administration. It protects suppliers against buyer insolvency.

This scenario is in fact based on a famous case law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v New Garage & Motor co [1915] AC 79. In this case law, the House of Lords identified the clause as liquidated damages, and therefore enforceable.

However, if this case had happened in 2015 or afterwards, there would be some legal issues:

- The price agreement is prohibited by Competition Act 1998

- If the agreement is allowed by Competition Act, as in the case Cavendish Square Holding BV (Appellant) v Talal El Makdessi (Respondent), the clause can also be identified as a penalty and it is still enforceable.

LO 3, AC 3.2

Where the sale of goods is between two businesses in different Contracting States, then it is international and the CISG rules of law automatically apply unless they have been excluded. A contract clause stating that the contract is subject to the legal systems and courts of a particular country overrides or excludes the CISG rules, since the local rules of that country would apply instead.

So the answer should be Canada's legal system.

LO 1, AC 1.2

A liquidated damages clause specifies a predetermined amount of money that must be paid as damages for failure to perform under a contract. The amount of the liquidated damages is supposed to be the parties' best estimate at the time they sign the contract of the damages that would be caused by a breach. If a breach occurs and the liquidated damages clause is enforceable, the parties do not calculate the actual damages (i.e., how much money a party actually lost as a result of the breach). Instead, the breaching party pays the predetermined sum provided by the liquidated damages provision.

To be enforceable, a liquidated damages clause should meet the following criteria.

Damages are difficult to estimate. A court will be more likely to enforce a liquidated damages provision if the damages that will be incurred as a result of a breach of the contract are difficult to estimate when the contract is entered into. In certain situations, injuries are easy to prove. For example, if a breach will result in the loss of sales, it is easy to determine the actual damages by calculating lost profits. Others are more difficult, like the harm caused by breach of a confidentiality agreement or theft of trade secrets. To be enforceable, the damages should be either uncertain or difficult to quantify at the time the contract is entered into.

The amount is reasonable and not a penalty. If the amount of the liquidated damages is grossly disproportionate to the actual harm incurred, a court will likely find it is a penalty or punishment and will not enforce the provision. When making this analysis, courts usually consider what was reasonable at the time the contract was entered into as opposed to when the breach occurred. There have been cases, however, where courts will decide the reasonableness of the damage estimate based on the actual harm at the time of the breach.

The scenario is excerpted and edited based on a real world case law. In that case, the court held that GPP was entitled to liquidated damages under all four of the EPC contracts, ruling that the provisions did not amount to unenforceable penalties in each of the contracts.

- CIPS study guide page 158-159

- Liquidated damages in energy projects

- What Is a Liquidated Damages Provision?

LO 3, AC 3.2

A confidentiality and data use clause is designed to govern how information, especially sensitive or personal data, is handled. It sets boundaries on disclosure, data sharing, and use, which is essential under data protection laws such as GDPR, especially when information is passed to third parties.