CIPS L4M1 Exam Dumps

How to approach this question

- There are three questions within this question. The purpose could be your introduction, and then take two big sections in the main body of your essay for the elements and how to evaluate it.

Example Essay

A Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy serves as a formal commitment by a company to conduct its business in a socially responsible and sustainable manner. The purpose of a CSR policy is to outline the organization's dedication to ethical practices, environmental stewardship, and social contributions. It reflects a company's commitment to going beyond mere profit generation and actively engaging in initiatives that benefit society and the environment.

Elements of a CSR Policy:

1. Ethical Business Practices:

* Clearly articulated principles on fair business dealings, anti-corruption measures, and adherence to ethical standards in all operations.

2. Environmental Sustainability:

* Commitments to minimize environmental impact through sustainable practices, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and responsible sourcing of materials.

3. Social Responsibility:

* Efforts to contribute positively to the community, which may include support for education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, or other social initiatives.

4. Labor Practices:

* Fair and ethical treatment of employees, including non-discrimination, fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' rights.

5. Supply Chain Responsibility:

* A commitment to ensuring that suppliers and partners adhere to similar ethical and CSR standards, promoting responsible practices throughout the entire supply chain.

6. Transparency and Accountability:

* Open disclosure of CSR initiatives, performance, and impacts, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and being accountable for CSR goals.

7. Stakeholder Engagement:

* A pledge to engage with and consider the interests of various stakeholders, including employees, customers, communities, and shareholders, in decision-making processes.

Evaluating a Supplier's CSR Policy:

Assessing a potential supplier's CSR policy involves a comprehensive examination of key factors to ensure alignment with ethical and responsible business practices:

1. Policy Content:

* Review the content of the CSR policy to ensure it covers a broad spectrum of social, environmental, and ethical aspects. A comprehensive policy reflects a commitment to holistic CSR practices.

2. Alignment with Industry Standards:

* Check if the CSR policy aligns with industry-specific standards and best practices. Adherence to recognized standards, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or ISO 26000, indicates a commitment to global CSR norms.

3. Performance Metrics:

* Evaluate whether the supplier includes measurable performance metrics in their CSR policy. Clear objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) demonstrate a commitment to continual improvement and accountability.

4. Stakeholder Engagement:

* Assess how the supplier engages with stakeholders. A robust CSR policy should involve stakeholders in decision-making processes and demonstrate an understanding of their concerns.

5. Supply Chain Responsibility:

* Check if the supplier extends CSR principles to its supply chain. This involves ensuring that suppliers and partners adhere to ethical, environmental, and social standards, contributing to a responsible and sustainable supply chain.

6. Transparency and Reporting:

* Look for transparency in reporting. A supplier that openly communicates about its CSR initiatives, achievements, and challenges indicates a commitment to accountability and transparency.

7. Continuous Improvement:

* Evaluate if the supplier emphasizes a commitment to continuous improvement in its CSR policy. This indicates a dynamic approach to addressing emerging challenges and staying ahead of evolving CSR expectations.

By thoroughly examining these aspects, a buyer can gain insights into a potential supplier's commitment to corporate social responsibility and make informed decisions that align with their own CSR objectives and values.

Tutor Notes

- Students often ask if they can use bullet points in their essays. Many tutors say no, but the answer is actually more nuanced than that. I've purposefully written the above in bullet points to show you how it can be done effectively. Bullet points are fine, providing you're using full sentences and it makes sense as a stylistic choice. It's not a good option if you're just going to list things without context. Then it can be hard to follow. I've personally used bullet points in essays and done really well. There's no rule against it. You've just got to make sure you're doing it 'right'.

- CSR policies are only briefly mentioned in LO 2.4 but it does come up as quite a big topic in other parts of the syllabus so is worth knowing. You could mention some examples of big companies and what their stance on CSR is. A good one to look at is The Body Shop.

- The study guide references Carroll's Pyramid -- this would be great to include in your essay Carroll's CSR Pyramid explained: Theory, Examples and Criticism (toolshero.com) p.112

- Definition of P2P - Purchase to Pay or Procure to Pay is the process an organisation takes from ordering a product to paying for it. The main stages of this process are product ordering, supplier requisition to pay, budget authorisation, receipt of delivery, and invoice processing.

- Impact of using IT Systems -- can include the use of these systems: EPOS, barcodes/ RDIF, e-commerce systems such as POs and invoicing, and electronic communications such as email. Impacts can be; increased productivity, quicker processes, higher levels of visibility, increased responsiveness to demands, cost savings, less paper used, supplier relationships are managed virtually rather than in person. Generally the impacts are positive, but you could also discuss some disadvantages or challenges a department might face as the question is quite open.

Example Essay

A Procure-to-Pay system is a comprehensive solution that automates and integrates the procurement process within an organization, covering the entire lifecycle from requisitioning goods or services to making payments to suppliers.

The P2P process includes the following: a buyer requests an item, they put in a requisition, it is accepted by the supplier, the item is delivered and the item is then paid for. The order of the steps may be different depending on the industry / requirement (e.g. sometimes payment is made before delivery), or sometimes there are additional steps such as getting the requisition approved by a manager.

Nowadays the P2P process is mainly digitalised- orders are made online or via a PO system and payment is made via BACS. It is not common to pay for items in cash or by cheque any more. This digitalisation has had many effects on the way the procurement department functions. The P2P system streamlines and standardizes the purchasing process, enhancing efficiency, transparency, and control.

The integration of Information Technology (IT) systems has a profound impact on the functioning of the Procurement department within an organization. This digital transformation brings about significant improvements in efficiency, transparency, collaboration, and decision-making processes. Some of the key impacts include:

- Raised productivity -- using IT systems results in quicker processes and they're often more accurate and consistent than humans doing the tasks manually. For example, an electronic requisition system can flag when a requisition isn't completed properly (e.g. part of the requisition is missing or a supplier name has been spelled incorrectly). When doing this manually the errors may not be spotted.

- Innovation -- the use of IT means new avenues can be explored in terms of new product markets and new supply chains. Without the use of IT, procurement may be limited to working with local suppliers or those they can find in the phone book. Using IT systems such as e-auctions and even just the internet to complete research, opens up more opportunities to make purchases. This could involve working with international supply chains and result in cost savings for the business.

- Improved business processes -- the use of IT means there is more transparency as everything is recorded and it is easier for managers to oversee. This results in less risk exposure for the business, particularly in fraud. The use of IT also standardises processes which makes it easy for everyone to know what to do.

- When IT is used, there is an increased responsiveness of the procurement function -- it allows for 24/7/365 ordering compared to making purchases in person in a shop which may only be open 9-5. Moreover , there are paperless communications when IT is used-- this has a positive environmental impact

- Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) - IT systems support Supplier Relationship Management by providing tools to assess and manage supplier performance. This can include logging KPIs and tracking supplier performance. SRM functionalities enhance communication, collaboration, and visibility into supplier relationships.

In summary, the integration of IT systems into the Procurement department transforms traditional practices, making processes more streamlined, data-driven, and strategically focused. The impact is not only on operational efficiency but also on the ability of the procurement function to contribute strategically to the organization's overall objectives.

Tutor Notes

- The word impact is quite vague. I've mainly talked about advantages but you could discuss the impact that the use of IT has had on the department, not just in how it functions, but in how it is perceived. IT has professionalised the procurement industry as a whole- it's no longer seen as 'purchasing' but as a vital function within a business that contributes to added value and strategic goals.

- You could also talk about the impact it's had on ways of working. The use of IT has allowed for innovative procurement and manufacturing techniques such as Just-In-Time.The use of IT also ends silo-working, instead allowing for more collaboration with other business departments and the supply chain as a whole.

- LO 3.4 P. 171

Essay Plan:

Definition of Stakeholder- someone who has a 'stake' or interest in the company. A person or organisation who influences and can be influenced by the company.

Categories of stakeholders:

1) Internal Stakeholders- these people work inside the company e.g. employees, managers etc

2) Connected- these people work with the company e.g. suppliers, mortgage lenders

3) External Stakeholders -- these people are outside of the company e.g. the government, professional bodies, the local community.

Example Essay:

A stakeholder is an individual, group, or entity that has a vested interest or concern in the activities, decisions, or outcomes of an organization or project. Stakeholders are those who can be affected by or can affect the organization, and they play a crucial role in influencing its success, sustainability, and reputation. Understanding and managing stakeholder relationships is a fundamental aspect of effective organizational governance and decision-making and there are several different types of stakeholders.

Firstly, internal stakeholders are those individuals or groups directly connected to the daily operations and management of the organization. Internal stakeholders are key to success and are arguably more vested in the company succeeding. They may depend on the company for their income / livelihood. Anyone who contributes to the company's internal functions can be considered an internal stakeholder for example:

This category includes

1) Employees: With a direct influence on the organization's success, employees are critical internal stakeholders. Their engagement, satisfaction, and productivity impact the overall performance.

2) Management and Executives: The leadership team has a significant influence on the organization's strategic direction and decision-making. Their decisions can shape the company's future.

Secondly, connected stakeholders are those individuals or groups whose interests are tied to the organization but may not be directly involved in its day-to-day operations. Connected stakeholders work alongside the organisation and often have a contractual relationship with the organisation. For example, banks, mortgage lenders, and suppliers. These stakeholders have an interest in the business succeeding, but not as much as internal stakeholders. It is important to keep these stakeholders satisfied as the organisation does depend on them to some extent. For example, it is important that the organisation has a good relationship with their bank / mortgage provider/ supplier as failing to pay what they owe may result in the stakeholders taking legal action against the organisation.

This category includes:

1) Shareholders/Investors: Holding financial stakes in the organization, shareholders seek a return on their investment and have a vested interest in the company's financial performance.

2) Suppliers and Partners: External entities providing goods, services, or collaboration. Their relationship with the organization impacts the quality and efficiency of its operations.

Lastly external stakeholders are entities outside the organization that can influence or be influenced by its actions. This category includes anyone who is affected by the company but who does not contribute to internal operations. They have less power to influence decisions than internal and connected stakeholders. External stakeholders include the government, professional bodies, pressure groups and the local community. They have quite diverse objectives and have varying ability to influence the organisation. For example, the government may be able to influence the organisation by passing legislation that regulates the industry but they do not have the power to get involved in the day-to-day affairs of the company. Pressure groups may have varying degrees of success in influencing the organisation depending on the subject matter. This category includes:

1) Customers: With a direct impact on the organization's revenue, customers are vital external stakeholders. Their satisfaction and loyalty are crucial for the company's success.

2) Government and Regulatory Bodies: External entities overseeing industry regulations. Compliance with these regulations is crucial for the organization's reputation and legal standing.

In conclusion, stakeholders are diverse entities with a vested interest in an organization's activities. The three categories---internal, connected and external ---encompass various groups that significantly influence and are influenced by the organization. Recognizing and addressing the needs and concerns of stakeholders are vital for sustainable and responsible business practices.

Tutor Notes

- The above essay is pretty short and to the point and would pass. If you want to beef out the essay you can include some of the following information for a higher score:

- Stakeholders can be harmed by, or benefit from the organisation (can affect and be affected by the organisation). For example a stakeholder can be harmed if the organisation becomes involved in illegal or immoral practices- e.g. the local community can suffer if the organisation begins to pollute the local rivers. The local community can also benefit from the organisation through increased employment levels.

- CSR argues organisations should respect the rights of stakeholder groups

- Stakeholders are important because they may have direct or indirect influence on decisions

- The public sector has a wider and more complex range of stakeholders as they're managed on behalf of society as a whole. They're more likely to take a rage of stakeholder views into account when making decisions. However, these stakeholders are less powerful -- i.e. they can't threaten market sanctions, to withdraw funding, or to quit the business etc.

- The essay doesn't specifically ask you to Map Stakeholders, but you could throw in a cheeky mention of Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix, perhaps in the conclusion. Don't spend time describing it though- you won't get more than 1 point for mentioning it. You'd be better off spending your time giving lots and lots of examples of different types of stakeholders.

- Study guide p. 58

How to approach this question:

- The Sourcing Cycle is the first half of the CIPS Procurement Cycle and includes these steps:

1) Define Business Need

2) Market Analysis + Make vs Buy

3) Develop Strategy and Plan

4) Pre-Procurement Market Testing

5) Develop Documents and Specification

6) Supplier Selection

7) Issue Tender

8) Bid Evaluation

9) Contract Award and Implementation

Your response should detail 5 of these. It is a good idea to pick the ones you know most about and where there is more to write about. You won't get any extra points for naming more than 5 so focus on getting as much detail down about 5, rather than explaining more of them.

Essay Plan

Introduction -- explain what the sourcing cycle is -- the stages of the procurement cycle before a contract is signed. It describes the steps an organisation will take to source/ procures goods or services.

Paragraph 1 -- Define the business need

* How is the need identified? E.g. by end user, stores department, ERP system.

* Procurement should challenge this -- is it really necessary? Suggest alternatives -- this could be a key source of added value

* Put together business case / requisition / project initiation document

* What type of purchase? Straight rebuy, modified rebuy, new purchase

* Decide on what type of specification would be best - Conformance vs performance specification

* This stage may include early supplier involvement

Paragraph 2 -- Market Analysis and Make vs Buy Decision

* Create an Analysis by segmenting the market by buyer, product, distribution channel, geography, customer market etc.

* Make vs Buy - use Carter's Matrix to decide whether the organisation should make vs buy.

* Also consider outsourcing at this stage

Paragraph 3 -- Documents and Specification

* Draft documents. These may include a RFQ or ITT, a specification and a proposed form of contract

* Specification may be conformance or performance based

* A contract sets out the roles, rights, responsibilities and obligations of the parties and shows intention to enter into 'legal relations'

* This stage defines the 'offer' which becomes binding once other party accepts

* Documentation may also include proposed KPIs and SLAs

Paragraph 4 -- Supplier Selection

* For a new purchase, supplier selection is very important - investigation should be proportionate to the value of the procurement. For rebuys or low-risk purchases you could use the same supplier or a list of pre-approved suppliers.

* You can locate potential suppliers by; catalogues, websites, trade registers, market exchanges and review sites, trade or industry press, fairs and conferences, networking and recommendations/ referrals.

* You can shortlist suppliers by sending out a pre-qualification questionnaire. This adds value by reducing wasted time / costs / risks to entering into a contract with the wrong supplier.

* Other criteria for supplier selection include using Carter's 10 Cs (competency, consistency, capability, control, cost, cash, clean, communication, culture, commitment), the supplier's financial standing (e.g. liquidity and gearing), references and considering their CSR policy.

Paragraph 5 -- Issue Tender

* Competitive bidding should only be done when there's sufficient time and resources available, there's sufficient suppliers in the marketplace, they're keen to win business (ie that there's appetite for competition) and there is a strong specification

* Best practice is to issue tenders electronically as it ensures equal treatment of suppliers and transparency

* Consider open vs closed procurement processes

* Use a cross-functional team -- particularly when marking responses

Conclusion -- you could mention here that different sourcing activities may require more or less effort at each of the stages e.g. procuring a new item may require more market analysis than a re-buy.

Tutor Notes:

- If you want to add in extra details, you could think about ways procurement can add value at each stage

- In the old syllabus, CIPS were a bit obsessed with Michael Porter. In the Market Analysis bit you could talk about using Porter's 5 forces (buyer and supplier power, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutions, supplier rivalry) and Porter's 3 generic strategies for competing (cost leadership, differentiation, niche segment). This has been removed from the study guide so it's not essential to know this for this module, but if you've seen it before it's a nice one to throw in.

- You could also mention that there are differences between the public and private sector procurement at the different stages. E.g. Public Sector requires open competitions for contracts of a certain value and must follow the rules set out in Public Contract Regulations -- the private sector doesn't have such strict regulations so there is much more flexibility in how tenders are completed. Also in the public sector, the evaluation criteria needs to be agreed beforehand and presented in the ITT- not the same for the private sector.

- Study guide p.71

- Definition of 'structured procurement process' -- when an organisation provides a sequence of actions / steps to take to get the outcome (the procurement of an item). This involves an organisation providing guidelines and instructions of how things should be done. Basically following a step-by-step process.

- Why this is important -- Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done, maintains consistency, prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour, improves efficiency, better managerial control, compliance (with laws and standards), assists with continuous improvement, may result in time/ cost savings, reduces risks such as fraudulent spending.

Example essay:

The first part of the question is worth 10 points, so you could include a few of the following points. It would also be good to include examples:

- Structured procurement involves creating rules on how procurement should be done

- This is in contrast to reactive / maverick spending

- May come about due to company policy, external regulations or through trying to achieve Competitive Advantage

- Examples include an organisation having set procedures for ordering items of different spend- e.g. Procurement Assistants can purchase items up to 500. Items between 500-1000 require a manager's approval and anything over 1000 requires a written Business Case in order to procure

- Structures Procurement Processes will usually also include the use of a designated e-procurement tool. E.g. an organisation may insist that all tenders use a certain online system and that invoices are sent via X system within 30 days.

The second part of the question is worth slightly more points, so spend more time on this. You could put each of the reasons why it is important in a separate paragraph. Also use examples where you can;

- Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done- having structured processes means having a step-by-step guide to how to procure. This means activities are well co-ordinated and there are no gaps, no duplications of effort and no conflicting efforts. It may involve assigning different people in the team different roles e.g. someone makes the requisition and someone else approves it. It also means that nothing is forgotten.

- Maintains consistency- having standardised processes means each procurement exercise follows the same process. This may include using a standard template for a requisition or ITT. Where there is consistency, this results in time being saved and less mistakes being made as everyone (including supply partners) is familiar with the processes.

- Prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour- in organisations that use structured procurement processes everyone does the same. This means there is no conflict (e.g. one person doing things one way and another person does it differently and arguing which way is best). It also means no one can do procurement 'wrong' -- there are written guides and procedures to follow. This is particularly helpful for new starters.

- Efficiency -- time and money can be saved where there are standard procedures as people don't have to plan each procurement activity individually. Structured Procurement Processes may also involve completing bulk orders and co-ordinating activity within the organisation which means less orders are placed over the year and efficiency savings can be made. For example, a factory may create an order of cleaning products once a quarter, compared to ordering products just as and when they are required. This will save time of the procurement department overall throughout the year and allows them to focus on other more value-adding tasks.

- Better managerial control -- Managers have more oversight when using structured procurement. There are clear rules as to when managers need to be involved and provide sign-off. This visibility makes it easier for managers to make decisions and allows for early intervention where someone needs assistance. It will reduce maverick spending and fraudulent spending. For example, it is much harder to provide kick-backs to suppliers when there are clear processes and audit trails and managers have visibility over all processes.

- Compliance (with laws and standards) -- particularly in the Public Sector there are rules and regulations regarding procurement practices. Using standardised processes allows organisations to demonstrate compliance with appropriate legislation. It also protects them from 'challenge'. This is when a bidder who is unsuccessful challenges the decision to award a contract to someone else. Using a structured procurement process allows the organisation to demonstrate that they procured the item correctly and the challenge is unfounded.

Tutor Notes

- This topic isn't as well explained in the new study guide as it used to be. It's all pretty obvious stuff but the language is slightly different. The guide now talks about 'compliance with processes' and the benefits this brings. Which is exactly the same as why do you follow a structured process. This is on p. 114.

- If you're feeling clever, you could mention the difference between Public and Private Sector- e.g. a private organisation may use standardised processes for efficiency and cost savings, whereas a public sector organisation may use it more for compliance purposes.