- 219 Actual Exam Questions
- Compatible with all Devices
- Printable Format
- No Download Limits
- 90 Days Free Updates
Get All AWS Certified CloudOps Engineer - Associate Exam Questions with Validated Answers
| Vendor: | Amazon |
|---|---|
| Exam Code: | SOA-C03 |
| Exam Name: | AWS Certified CloudOps Engineer - Associate |
| Exam Questions: | 219 |
| Last Updated: | July 6, 2026 |
| Related Certifications: | Amazon Associate, AWS Certified SysOps Administrator Associate |
| Exam Tags: | Associate Level AWS CloudOps Engineers and Systems Engineers |
Looking for a hassle-free way to pass the Amazon AWS Certified CloudOps Engineer - Associate exam? DumpsProvider provides the most reliable Dumps Questions and Answers, designed by Amazon certified experts to help you succeed in record time. Available in both PDF and Online Practice Test formats, our study materials cover every major exam topic, making it possible for you to pass potentially within just one day!
DumpsProvider is a leading provider of high-quality exam dumps, trusted by professionals worldwide. Our Amazon SOA-C03 exam questions give you the knowledge and confidence needed to succeed on the first attempt.
Train with our Amazon SOA-C03 exam practice tests, which simulate the actual exam environment. This real-test experience helps you get familiar with the format and timing of the exam, ensuring you're 100% prepared for exam day.
Your success is our commitment! That's why DumpsProvider offers a 100% money-back guarantee. If you don’t pass the Amazon SOA-C03 exam, we’ll refund your payment within 24 hours no questions asked.
Don’t waste time with unreliable exam prep resources. Get started with DumpsProvider’s Amazon SOA-C03 exam dumps today and achieve your certification effortlessly!
A company is migrating a legacy application to AWS. The application runs on EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The target group routing algorithm is set to weighted random, and the application requires session affinity (sticky sessions).
After deployment, users report random application errors that were not present before migration, even though target health checks are passing.
Which solution will meet this requirement?
According to the AWS Cloud Operations and Elastic Load Balancing documentation, Application Load Balancer (ALB) supports multiple routing algorithms to distribute requests among targets:
Round robin (default)
Least outstanding requests (LOR)
Weighted random
When applications require session affinity, AWS recommends using ''least outstanding requests'' as the load balancing algorithm because it reduces latency, distributes load evenly, and ensures consistent target responsiveness during high traffic.
Using weighted random routing with sticky sessions can cause sessions to be routed inconsistently if one target's capacity fluctuates, leading to session mismatches and application errors --- especially when user sessions rely on instance-specific state.
Disabling cross-zone balancing (Option C) or adjusting deregistration delay (Option D) does not address routing inconsistency. Anomaly mitigation (Option B) protects against target performance degradation, not sticky-session misrouting.
Therefore, the correct solution is Option A --- changing the target group's routing algorithm to least outstanding requests ensures smoother, predictable session handling and resolves random application errors.
A company has deployed Amazon EC2 instances from custom AMIs in two AWS Regions. All instances are registered with AWS Systems Manager. The company discovers a critical zero-day OS exploit but does not know which instances are affected.
A CloudOps engineer must deploy operating system patches with the LEAST operational overhead.
Which solution will meet this requirement?
AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager provides a centralized and automated way to scan, identify, and remediate missing patches across managed instances. Patch baselines define which patches are approved, and scan operations identify affected instances without applying changes.
Using Patch Now allows immediate remediation across Regions with minimal setup. Other options introduce unnecessary complexity or require manual intervention.
Therefore, Patch Manager with scan and Patch Now is the least operationally intensive solution.
A company has a critical serverless application that uses multiple AWS Lambda functions. Each Lambda function generates 1 GB of log data daily in its own Amazon CloudWatch Logs log group. The company's security team asks for a count of application errors, grouped by type, across all of the log groups.
What should a CloudOps engineer do to meet this requirement?
CloudWatch Logs Insights is purpose-built for interactive querying and analysis across log data that is stored in CloudWatch Logs. It supports selecting multiple log groups at once (including many Lambda log groups), filtering events to match error patterns, extracting fields, and aggregating results. The requirement is to produce a count of application errors grouped by type across all log groups, which aligns directly with Logs Insights capabilities.
With Logs Insights, a CloudOps engineer can query all relevant Lambda log groups, parse or extract an ''error type'' field from structured JSON logs (or use pattern parsing for unstructured logs), and then aggregate using the stats command with count() grouped by the parsed error type field. This approach is fast to implement, requires no data pipeline, and scales well for large volumes because Logs Insights is optimized for CloudWatch Logs data. It also supports time-range selection so the security team can request daily or incident-window reporting.
Option B is incorrect because CloudWatch Logs ''search'' is a basic filtering feature and does not provide the same structured aggregation and grouping features as Logs Insights for large-scale, cross-log-group analytics. Option C (Athena) would require exporting logs to Amazon S3 (for example, via subscription filters, Kinesis Data Firehose, or scheduled exports) and maintaining a schema and partitions, which adds operational overhead not required here. Option D is not applicable because CloudWatch log data is not queried through Amazon RDS, and using an RDS database for log analytics would introduce significant ingestion and operational complexity.
Therefore, running a CloudWatch Logs Insights query using stats and count() to group errors by type across all Lambda log groups is the correct solution.
A company must ensure that all Amazon EC2 Windows instances that are launched in an AWS account have a third-party agent installed. The company uses AWS Systems Manager, and the Windows instances are tagged appropriately. The company must deploy periodic updates to the third-party agent when the updates become available.
Which combination of steps will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational effort? (Select TWO.)
The least-effort, most scalable approach to ensure consistent software installation and ongoing updates across tagged Windows instances is to use AWS Systems Manager's native software distribution and desired-state capabilities. Systems Manager Distributor lets you package third-party software as an ''SSM package,'' version it, and publish updates in a controlled way. This directly supports the requirement to install a third-party agent and deploy periodic updates when new versions are available.
State Manager Associations let you enforce configuration continuously or on a schedule across a fleet, targeting instances by tags (which the scenario explicitly says are in place). By creating an association that runs AWS-ConfigureAWSPackage, you instruct Systems Manager to install (and optionally update) a specific SSM package on all instances that match the Windows tag criteria. This provides ongoing compliance: newly launched instances that receive the tag will automatically get the agent installed, and existing instances will receive updates according to the association's frequency and the package version strategy.
Option C (custom Lambda that logs in) is high operational overhead and poor practice (credentials, connectivity, error handling, scaling, and security concerns). Option D (RunRemoteScript) can work but is more brittle than ConfigureAWSPackage because it shifts lifecycle management (versioning, state, idempotency) into scripts. Option B (OpsItem + Inventory) is not an enforcement mechanism for installation/updating; it's for operations tracking and visibility.
Therefore, Distributor (A) + State Manager association using AWS-ConfigureAWSPackage targeted by tags (E) is the cleanest and lowest-ops solution.
A CloudOps engineer is maintaining a web application that uses an Amazon CloudFront web distribution, an Application Load Balancer (ALB), Amazon RDS, and Amazon EC2 in a VPC. All services have logging enabled. The CloudOps engineer needs to investigate HTTP Layer 7 status codes from the web application.
Which log sources contain the status codes? (Select TWO.)
Layer 7 (application-layer) HTTP status codes such as 200, 404, and 500 are generated by web-facing services that process HTTP requests. In this architecture, both CloudFront and the Application Load Balancer (ALB) operate at Layer 7 and record HTTP response information in their access logs.
ALB access logs include detailed request and response data such as client IP address, request path, target response status code, and latency. These logs are essential for analyzing how backend EC2 instances respond to client requests.
CloudFront access logs record viewer requests and responses at the edge locations. These logs also include HTTP status codes returned to the client, making them critical for understanding end-user experience and edge-level behavior.
VPC Flow Logs capture network-level (Layer 3 and 4) traffic metadata such as source IP, destination IP, ports, and protocol. They do not contain HTTP status codes. AWS CloudTrail logs API calls to AWS services and does not capture application response codes. RDS logs contain database-related information, not HTTP responses.
Therefore, the correct sources for HTTP Layer 7 status codes are ALB access logs and CloudFront access logs.
Security & Privacy
Satisfied Customers
Committed Service
Money Back Guranteed