Amazon SOA-C03 Exam Dumps

According to the AWS Cloud Operations, Governance, and Compliance documentation, AWS Config provides managed rules that automatically evaluate resource configurations for compliance. The ''required-tags'' managed rule allows CloudOps teams to specify mandatory tags (e.g., Environment, Owner, CostCenter) and automatically detect non-compliant resources such as DynamoDB tables.

Furthermore, AWS Config supports automatic remediation through AWS Systems Manager Automation runbooks, enabling correction actions (for example, adding missing tags) without manual intervention. This automation minimizes operational overhead and ensures continuous compliance across multiple accounts.

Using a custom Lambda function (Options A or B) introduces unnecessary management complexity, while EventBridge rules alone (Option D) do not provide resource compliance tracking or historical visibility.

Therefore, Option C provides the most efficient, fully managed, and compliant CloudOps solution.

Auto Scaling groups with target tracking scaling policies automatically adjust capacity based on real-time demand. This solution is ideal for handling unpredictable and random traffic spikes.

Target tracking scaling maintains a metric, such as average CPU utilization or request count per target, at a defined target value. The Auto Scaling group automatically launches or terminates instances as traffic fluctuates.

Manual scaling, EventBridge-based scaling, or scheduled scaling do not respond dynamically to random traffic patterns.

Therefore, an Auto Scaling group with a target tracking scaling policy is the correct solution.

Cluster placement groups are specifically designed for workloads that require extremely low latency and high network throughput, such as HPC applications. Instances are placed physically close together within the same Availability Zone, enabling high-bandwidth, low-latency networking.

Partition placement groups are optimized for fault isolation, not network performance. Spread placement groups prioritize availability by distributing instances across distinct hardware, which increases latency.

Because the requirement is performance rather than fault isolation or high availability, a cluster placement group is the optimal choice.

Aurora Auto Scaling can automatically add or remove Aurora Replicas based on target metrics, including average connections across Aurora Replicas. AWS documentation lists ''Average connections of Aurora Replicas'' as a target metric when adding an auto scaling policy to an Aurora DB cluster. Because performance degrades above 200 connections and baseline usage is around 180, setting a target near 195 allows scaling to begin before the connection count crosses the problem threshold. Option A is vertical scaling and does not automatically respond to fluctuating demand. Option B is not how Aurora switches between provisioned and serverless modes during spikes. Option C is unnecessary and does not address read scaling with replicas. Therefore, an Aurora auto scaling policy using the database connections metric is correct.

According to the AWS Cloud Operations and Database Reliability documentation, Amazon RDS Multi-AZ deployments provide high availability and automatic failover by maintaining a synchronous standby replica in a different Availability Zone.

In the event of instance failure, planned maintenance, or Availability Zone outage, Amazon RDS automatically promotes the standby to primary with minimal downtime (typically less than 60 seconds). The failover is transparent to applications because the DB endpoint remains the same.

By contrast, read replicas (Option B) are asynchronous and do not provide automated failover. Auto Scaling (Option C) applies to EC2, not RDS. RDS Proxy (Option D) improves connection management but does not add redundancy.

Thus, Option A --- converting the RDS instance into a Multi-AZ deployment --- delivers the required high availability and business continuity with minimal operational effort.