Adobe AD0-E123 Exam Dumps

The request log in AEM records details about requests processed by the AEM instance, including transaction response times. This log is useful for developers when they need to analyze the performance of page requests, including how long each page takes to load. The request log can typically be found in the logs directory of the AEM installation and may be named request.log.

stdout.log typically contains the standard output of the AEM process and is not specific to request transactions.

audit.log is used to log user actions for auditing purposes and does not include transaction response times.

In Sling Models, annotations are used to map request parameters, attributes, and properties to fields in Java classes. When an HTL script passes parameters to a Sling Model, the Sling Model can use annotations to access these parameters.

Option B uses the @RequestAttribute annotation which allows the Sling Model to retrieve an attribute that has been set on the Sling HTTP request object. This is a valid approach to read the 'testParam' if it has been set as a request attribute.

Option C uses the @Inject annotation with the name attribute specifying the name of the parameter to inject. This is another valid approach to read the 'testParam' from the request.

Option A is incorrect because @Named is not the correct annotation for retrieving request attributes or parameters.

Option D is incorrect because there is no @Prop annotation in Sling Models; it's likely confused with the @Property annotation which is not the correct one for this context either.

When modifications are made to a workflow model in AEM, they must be saved and synchronized with the running instance of AEM. If a user starts a workflow and does not see the recent changes or workflow steps, it could be because the workflow model was not synced in runtime. This means the running instance of AEM is not yet aware of the changes, and as a result, the workflow instance uses the old version of the workflow model.

Option B is incorrect because permissions would not cause the recent changes to be unavailable; they would more likely prevent the user from starting the workflow at all.

Option C is also incorrect because while errors in subsequent steps could potentially stop the workflow from proceeding, they would not prevent new steps from appearing in the workflow instance if they were properly saved and synced.

In Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), when dealing with live copies, a content author must be aware of various factors related to the synchronization of content between the source (blueprint) and the live copies. Option A is correct because when inheritance is re-enabled on a live copy page, synchronization with the blueprint page occurs, which may include automatic updates to the live copy page's content. Option D is also correct because local changes made to a component marked as a container are protected during rollouts, meaning that these local changes will not be overwritten by content from the blueprint. The container concept in AEM allows for more granular control over which parts of the page are updated during synchronization.

For Option B, the term 'paragraph system' seems incorrect. It should likely refer to 'paragraph systems' as in the ParSys (Paragraph System), a component that allows authors to add components to a page. There is no automatic restoration of the order of components from the blueprint upon re-enabling canceled inheritance; instead, components are managed according to the rules set in the rollout configurations.

Option C is incorrect because the cancel and suspend actions can be applied to individual child components within a container. When inheritance is canceled for a container, the inheritance status of child components within that container can be controlled individually.

When working with custom workflow steps in AEM, metadata associated with the workflow session can be programmatically accessed and manipulated. The MetaDataMap object serves as a container for this data. The correct way to access and modify this metadata in Java would be:

Option C, MetaDataMap wfd = WorkItem.getWorkflow().getWorkflowData().getMetaDataMap(); wfd.put('mykey', 'My Step Value'); This snippet correctly retrieves the MetaDataMap from the WorkflowData of the current Workflow session. It then uses the put method to store a new key-value pair, where 'mykey' is the key and 'My Step Value' is the value to be saved.

Options A and B do not properly chain the method calls to access the MetaDataMap associated with the current workflow session and are therefore incorrect.